Literature DB >> 9163445

Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in male and female urine specimens by using the amplified Chlamydia trachomatis test.

J W Mouton1, R Verkooyen, W I van der Meijden, T H van Rijsoort-Vos, W H Goessens, J A Kluytmans, S D Deelen, A Luijendijk, H A Verbrugh.   

Abstract

The amplified Chlamydia trachomatis test (AMP-CT; Gen-Probe), a new diagnostic test for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, was evaluated with urine specimens from 1,000 patients visiting the outpatient department for sexually transmitted diseases at the University Hospital Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, by comparing the results to those of cell culture. From February 1996 to July 1996, urine samples for the AMP-CT test and urethral swabs for cell culture were collected from 544 men, while cervical swabs from 456 women were also taken for cell culture. Positive test results were obtained for 130 (13%) of the patients. AMP-CT test and cell culture results were discordant for 70 (7%) specimens. Analysis of the samples with discordant results was performed by an in-house PCR. After resolution of the discordant results, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the AMP-CT test were 84.3, 98.8, 89.6, and 98%, respectively, for samples from females and 100, 99.2, 93.1, and 100%, respectively, for samples from males, while for cell culture these values were 72.5, 99.2, 92.5, and 98%, respectively, for samples from females and 57.4, 99.0, 86.1, and 95.4%, respectively, for samples from males. We conclude that the AMP-CT test is a fast and reliable test for the detection of C. trachomatis in urine specimens from females and, in particular, males.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9163445      PMCID: PMC229750          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.35.6.1369-1372.1997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  22 in total

1.  Diagnostic tests should be used for sexually transmitted chlamydia.

Authors:  W E Stamm
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1990-11

2.  Assay formats involving acridinium-ester-labeled DNA probes.

Authors:  L J Arnold; P W Hammond; W A Wiese; N C Nelson
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  Rapid and simple method for purification of nucleic acids.

Authors:  R Boom; C J Sol; M M Salimans; C L Jansen; P M Wertheim-van Dillen; J van der Noordaa
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Genital Chlamydia infections.

Authors:  J M Ehret; F N Judson
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 1.935

5.  Comparison of HeLa 229 and McCoy cell cultures for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in clinical specimens.

Authors:  E A Thewessen; I Freundt; J H van Rijsoort-Vos; E Stolz; M F Michel; J H Wagenvoort
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Effect of swab type and storage temperature on the isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis from clinical specimens.

Authors:  J B Mahony; M A Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infection by detection of amplified DNA with an enzyme immunoassay.

Authors:  L Bobo; F Coutlee; R H Yolken; T Quinn; R P Viscidi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Detection of PCR inhibitors in cervical specimens by using the AMPLICOR Chlamydia trachomatis assay.

Authors:  R P Verkooyen; A Luijendijk; W M Huisman; W H Goessens; J A Kluytmans; J H van Rijsoort-Vos; H A Verbrugh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Performance of a nonisotopic DNA probe for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital specimens.

Authors:  J A Kluytmans; H G Niesters; J W Mouton; W G Quint; J A Ijpelaar; J H Van Rijsoort-Vos; L Habbema; E Stolz; M F Michel; J H Wagenvoort
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 10.  Laboratory diagnosis of human chlamydial infections.

Authors:  R C Barnes
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 26.132

View more
  17 in total

1.  Mailed, home-obtained urine specimens: a reliable screening approach for detecting asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

Authors:  S A Morré; I G van Valkengoed; A de Jong; A J Boeke; J T van Eijk; C J Meijer; A J van den Brule
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of three commercially available amplification assays, AMP CT, LCx, and COBAS AMPLICOR, for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine.

Authors:  W H Goessens; J W Mouton; W I van der Meijden; S Deelen; T H van Rijsoort-Vos; N Lemmens-den Toom; H A Verbrugh; R P Verkooyen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by the Gen-Probe AMPLIFIED Chlamydia Trachomatis Assay (AMP CT) in urine specimens from men and women and endocervical specimens from women.

Authors:  K A Crotchfelt; B Pare; C Gaydos; T C Quinn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison of an rRNA-based and DNA-based nucleic acid amplification test for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in trachoma.

Authors:  Jon L Yang; Julius Schachter; Jeanne Moncada; Dereje Habte; Mulat Zerihun; Jenafir I House; Zhaoxia Zhou; Kevin C Hong; Kathryn Maxey; Bruce D Gaynor; Thomas M Lietman
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Impact of menstrual cycle on the diagnostic performance of LCR, TMA, and PCE for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in home obtained and mailed vaginal flush and urine samples.

Authors:  J K Møller; B Andersen; F Olesen; T Lignell; L Ostergaard
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.519

6.  Cost effectiveness analysis of a population based screening programme for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women by means of home obtained urine specimens.

Authors:  I G van Valkengoed; M J Postma; S A Morré; A J van den Brule; C J Meijer; L M Bouter; A J Boeke
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.519

7.  Comparison of three nucleic acid amplification tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens.

Authors:  Charlotte A Gaydos; Mellisa Theodore; Nicholas Dalesio; Billie Jo Wood; Thomas C Quinn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Performance of transcription-mediated amplification and ligase chain reaction assays for detection of chlamydial infection in urogenital samples obtained by invasive and noninvasive methods.

Authors:  A Stary; E Schuh; M Kerschbaumer; B Götz; H Lee
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Rapid assessment of sexually transmitted diseases in a sentinel population in Thailand: prevalence of chlamydial infection, gonorrhoea, and syphilis among pregnant women--1996.

Authors:  P H Kilmarx; C M Black; K Limpakarnjanarat; N Shaffer; S Yanpaisarn; P Chaisilwattana; W Siriwasin; N L Young; C E Farshy; T D Mastro; M E St Louis
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.519

10.  Urine specimens from pregnant and nonpregnant women inhibitory to amplification of Chlamydia trachomatis nucleic acid by PCR, ligase chain reaction, and transcription-mediated amplification: identification of urinary substances associated with inhibition and removal of inhibitory activity.

Authors:  J Mahony; S Chong; D Jang; K Luinstra; M Faught; D Dalby; J Sellors; M Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.