Literature DB >> 8940450

Detection of PCR inhibitors in cervical specimens by using the AMPLICOR Chlamydia trachomatis assay.

R P Verkooyen1, A Luijendijk, W M Huisman, W H Goessens, J A Kluytmans, J H van Rijsoort-Vos, H A Verbrugh.   

Abstract

To determine that susceptibility of AMPLICOR Chlamydia trachomatis PCR to inhibitory factors possibly present in cervical specimens, we obtained cervical specimens from 200 gynecology patients attending our outpatient clinic. The prevalence of C. trachomatis infection was 4.1%, as determined by cell culture. All AMPLICOR specimens were tested in one procedure as described by the manufacturer, and after the specimen was spiked with C. trachomatis, several other pretreatment protocols were used. Complete inhibition of the PCR was observed in 38 (19%) cervical specimens. Heat treatment at 95 degrees C, freeze-thawing, or 10-fold dilution of the samples reduced the initial inhibition to 9, 16, or 9%, respectively. A combination of heat treatment and 10-fold dilution reduced the inhibition to 4% of the samples. A second specimen type (swabs inoculated in 0.2 M sucrose phosphate buffer [2SP]) was also evaluated. A 10-fold dilution of the spiked 2SP specimen resulted in an inhibition rate of 6%, which was comparable to that obtained by centrifugation of the 2SP specimen prior to processing. Furthermore, it was shown that the inhibition was not correlated with blood contamination. Processing the specimens on the day of collection or the day after resulted in a higher inhibition rate than did delayed processing (27.6 versus 15.5%, respectively). An inverse correlation was found between the concentration of C. trachomatis added to the sample and the rate of inhibition observed. The inhibition was partly correlated with the pH of the cervical mucosa. Decreased inhibition was found at pH values of > or = 7.5. The effects of blood, pH, and delay in processing were all evaluated by using the AMPLICOR specimen. We conclude that the susceptibility of AMPLICOR C. trachomatis PCR to inhibiting factors in cervical specimens can be significantly reduced if the pretreatment procedure includes heat treatment or the use of 2SP transport medium. Also, a 10-fold dilution of the clinical specimen followed by heat treatment will largely prevent the inhibition of this PCR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8940450      PMCID: PMC229461          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.34.12.3072-3074.1996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of polymerase chain reaction and chlamydiazyme for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in clinical specimens.

Authors:  T W Williams; S D Tyler; S Giercke; D R Pollard; P McNicol; K R Rozee
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infection by detection of amplified DNA with an enzyme immunoassay.

Authors:  L Bobo; F Coutlee; R H Yolken; T Quinn; R P Viscidi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Improved PCR detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by using an altered method of specimen transport and high-quality endocervical specimens.

Authors:  J A Kellogg; J W Seiple; J L Klinedinst; E S Stroll; S H Cavanaugh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Role of confirmatory PCRs in determining performance of Chlamydia Amplicor PCR with endocervical specimens from women with a low prevalence of infection.

Authors:  J B Mahony; K E Luinstra; J W Sellors; L Pickard; S Chong; D Jang; M A Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Use of the polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis from endocervical and urine specimens in an asymptomatic low-prevalence population of women.

Authors:  M Skulnick; R Chua; A E Simor; D E Low; H E Khosid; S Fraser; E Lyons; E A Legere; D A Kitching
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.803

6.  An evaluation of the polymerase chain reaction amplicor Chlamydia trachomatis in male urine and female urogenital specimens.

Authors:  A Bianchi; C Scieux; N Brunat; D Vexiau; M Kermanach; P Pezin; M Janier; P Morel; P H Lagrange
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.830

7.  Clinical evaluation of a new polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens.

Authors:  C A Bass; D L Jungkind; N S Silverman; J M Bondi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens by polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  M J Loeffelholz; C A Lewinski; S R Silver; A P Purohit; S A Herman; D A Buonagurio; E A Dragon
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis endocervical infections by a commercial polymerase chain reaction assay.

Authors:  J E Bauwens; A M Clark; W E Stamm
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.948

  9 in total
  35 in total

1.  Evaluation of the NucliSens Basic Kit for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in genital tract specimens using nucleic acid sequence-based amplification of 16S rRNA.

Authors:  J B Mahony; X Song; S Chong; M Faught; T Salonga; J Kapala
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of COBAS AMPLICOR (Roche): accuracy in detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by coamplification of endocervical specimens.

Authors:  C H Livengood; J W Wrenn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Removal of PCR inhibitors by silica membranes: evaluating the Amplicor Mycobacterium tuberculosis kit.

Authors:  B Böddinghaus; T A Wichelhaus; V Brade; T Bittner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Current and developing technologies for monitoring agents of bioterrorism and biowarfare.

Authors:  Daniel V Lim; Joyce M Simpson; Elizabeth A Kearns; Marianne F Kramer
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by enzyme immunoassay, culture, and three nucleic acid amplification tests.

Authors:  E Van Dyck; M Ieven; S Pattyn; L Van Damme; M Laga
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Nucleic acid amplification testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae: an ongoing challenge.

Authors:  David M Whiley; John W Tapsall; Theo P Sloots
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 7.  Diagnosis and assessment of trachoma.

Authors:  Anthony W Solomon; Rosanna W Peeling; Allen Foster; David C W Mabey
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Comparison of performances of two commercially available tests, a PCR assay and a ligase chain reaction test, in detection of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection.

Authors:  M Puolakkainen; E Hiltunen-Back; T Reunala; S Suhonen; P Lähteenmäki; M Lehtinen; J Paavonen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Performance of transcription-mediated amplification and ligase chain reaction assays for detection of chlamydial infection in urogenital samples obtained by invasive and noninvasive methods.

Authors:  A Stary; E Schuh; M Kerschbaumer; B Götz; H Lee
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Screening for sexually transmitted infection pathogens in semen samples.

Authors:  Rw Peeling; J Embree
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.471

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.