Literature DB >> 10615307

Impact of menstrual cycle on the diagnostic performance of LCR, TMA, and PCE for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in home obtained and mailed vaginal flush and urine samples.

J K Møller1, B Andersen, F Olesen, T Lignell, L Ostergaard.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of the menstrual cycle on the diagnostic performance of various assays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in home obtained and mailed vaginal flush and urine specimens.
METHODS: A ligase chain reaction assay (LCR; Abbott Laboratories), a transcription mediated amplification assay (TMA; Gen-Probe), and an enzyme amplified immunoassay (PCE; Dako Diagnostics) were evaluated for their validity in detecting C trachomatis in vaginal flush, first void urine, and midstream urine specimens obtained by female high school students at home and mailed directly to the diagnostic laboratory.
RESULTS: C trachomatis was detected in 45 of 889 females (5.1%). The vaginal flush material was positive by TMA and LCR in 84% and 82% of the chlamydia positive females, respectively. First void urine was positive by TMA in 73% and by LCR in 49% of the cases. Midstream urine was positive by TMA and LCR in 69% and 42% of the females, respectively. On a pool of first void and midstream urine, PCE detected 49% of the chlamydia positive females. The overall prevalence of C trachomatis increased with increasing time after the last menstrual bleeding. In urine samples, but not vaginal flush specimens, obtained 3 weeks after the last menstrual bleeding, the sensitivities of TMA, LCR, and PCE decreased markedly suggesting that inhibitors to the assays are excreted in the urine but not in vaginal secretions at this time.
CONCLUSION: Vaginal flush samples are superior to urines for detection of chlamydia infections in females. In screening of young asymptomatic females, samples should be obtained in the latter part of the menstrual cycle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10615307      PMCID: PMC1758220          DOI: 10.1136/sti.75.4.228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Infect        ISSN: 1368-4973            Impact factor:   3.519


  11 in total

1.  Efficacy of home sampling for screening of Chlamydia trachomatis: randomised study.

Authors:  L Ostergaard; B Andersen; F Olesen; J K Moller
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-07-04

2.  Chlamydia trachomatis detection and the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  P J Horner; T Crowley; J Leece; A Hughes; G D Smith; E O Caul
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-01-31       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  False-negative results of a ligase chain reaction assay to detect Chlamydia trachomatis due to inhibitors in urine.

Authors:  E S Berg; G Anestad; H Moi; G Størvold; K Skaug
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Home sampling versus conventional contact tracing for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis infection in male partners of infected women: randomised study.

Authors:  B Andersen; L Ostergaard; J K Møller; F Olesen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-01-31

Review 5.  The discrepancy in discrepant analysis.

Authors:  A Hadgu
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-08-31       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Sensitivity of ligase chain reaction assay of urine from pregnant women for Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  I P Jensen; P Thorsen; B R Møller
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-02-01       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in male and female urine specimens by using the amplified Chlamydia trachomatis test.

Authors:  J W Mouton; R Verkooyen; W I van der Meijden; T H van Rijsoort-Vos; W H Goessens; J A Kluytmans; S D Deelen; A Luijendijk; H A Verbrugh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Diagnosis of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women based on mailed samples obtained at home: multipractice comparative study.

Authors:  L Ostergaard; J K Møller; B Andersen; F Olesen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-11-09

9.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in men and women by testing first-void urine by ligase chain reaction.

Authors:  M A Chernesky; D Jang; H Lee; J D Burczak; H Hu; J Sellors; S J Tomazic-Allen; J B Mahony
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Pooling of urine specimens for PCR testing: a cost saving strategy for Chlamydia trachomatis control programmes.

Authors:  R W Peeling; B Toye; P Jessamine; I Gemmill
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.519

View more
  6 in total

1.  High-resolution genotyping of Chlamydia trachomatis from recurrent urogenital infections.

Authors:  L N Pedersen; H O Kjaer; J K Møller; T F Orntoft; L Ostergaard
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Effectiveness of a mass media campaign to recruit young adults for testing of Chlamydia trachomatis by use of home obtained and mailed samples.

Authors:  B Andersen; L Østergaard; J K Møller; F Olesen
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.519

3.  Mycoplasma genitalium: prevalence and behavioural risk factors in the general population.

Authors:  Berit Andersen; Ineta Sokolowski; Lars Østergaard; Jens Kjølseth Møller; Frede Olesen; Jørgen Skov Jensen
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 3.519

4.  Repeat chlamydia screening by mail, San Francisco.

Authors:  P J Bloomfield; K C Steiner; C K Kent; J D Klausner
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.519

5.  Mycoplasma genitalium among young, urban pregnant women.

Authors:  Vanessa L Short; Jørgen S Jensen; Deborah B Nelson; Pamela J Murray; Roberta B Ness; Catherine L Haggerty
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-03-31

6.  Chlamydia detection during the menstrual cycle: a cross-sectional study of women attending a sexual health service.

Authors:  Dana S Forcey; Jane S Hocking; Sepehr N Tabrizi; Catriona S Bradshaw; Marcus Y Chen; Glenda Fehler; Jessica L Nash; Christopher K Fairley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.