Literature DB >> 9705411

Performance of transcription-mediated amplification and ligase chain reaction assays for detection of chlamydial infection in urogenital samples obtained by invasive and noninvasive methods.

A Stary1, E Schuh, M Kerschbaumer, B Götz, H Lee.   

Abstract

Based on the amplification of chlamydia-specific rRNA sequences and the ligase chain reaction (LCR), the performance characteristics of the Gen-Probe Chlamydia trachomatis transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) assay were evaluated with endocervical, urine, and vulval specimens from women and urethral and urine specimens from men and were compared with those for cultures on endocervical, vulval, and urethral swabs. Of the 308 women and 240 men tested, 25 (8.1%) and 44 (18.3%), respectively, were shown to be infected. By using the infected individual as the expanded "gold standard" for calculations, the TMA assay and LCR gave similar performances for the sensitivity of male urethral (93.2%) and urine (88.6 and 86.4%) samples, while culture detected only half of the 44 infected men. In women, the sensitivities of the TMA assay for endocervical and vulval samples were 88 and 92%, respectively, compared to values of 92% for the LCR on both sample types and of 52 and 8%, respectively, for culture. By using first-void urine for chlamydial diagnosis in women, LCR detected 24 (96%) and TMA assay detected 19 (76%) infected individuals, showing a significantly lower sensitivity for urine in women (P = 0.0253). The results indicate a high overall agreement for both amplifying techniques for all examined specimen types, except for female urine. Furthermore, they confirm the previous observation that vulval swabs are an effective alternative noninvasive sample type for the detection of C. trachomatis infection in women by nucleic acid-based amplification technologies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9705411      PMCID: PMC105181     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  19 in total

Review 1.  The discrepancy in discrepant analysis.

Authors:  A Hadgu
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-08-31       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Ligase chain reaction to detect Chlamydia trachomatis infection of the cervix.

Authors:  J Schachter; W E Stamm; T C Quinn; W W Andrews; J D Burczak; H H Lee
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis urethral infection in symptomatic and asymptomatic men by testing first-void urine in a ligase chain reaction assay.

Authors:  M A Chernesky; H Lee; J Schachter; J D Burczak; W E Stamm; W M McCormack; T C Quinn
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  Comparison of DNA amplification methods for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine from asymptomatic military recruits.

Authors:  A Stary; S Tomazic-Allen; B Choueiri; J Burczak; K Steyrer; H Lee
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.830

5.  Diagnostic value of an amplification method (Gen-Probe) compared with that of culture for diagnosis of tuberculosis.

Authors:  F Vlaspolder; P Singer; C Roggeveen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Amplification of Chlamydia trachomatis DNA by ligase chain reaction.

Authors:  B J Dille; C C Butzen; L G Birkenmeyer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in men and women by testing first-void urine by ligase chain reaction.

Authors:  M A Chernesky; D Jang; H Lee; J D Burczak; H Hu; J Sellors; S J Tomazic-Allen; J B Mahony
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genitourinary infection in women by ligase chain reaction assay of urine.

Authors:  H H Lee; M A Chernesky; J Schachter; J D Burczak; W W Andrews; S Muldoon; G Leckie; W E Stamm
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-01-28       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Diagnosis by AMPLICOR PCR of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in urine samples from women and men attending sexually transmitted disease clinics.

Authors:  T C Quinn; L Welsh; A Lentz; K Crotchfelt; J Zenilman; J Newhall; C Gaydos
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a high-risk population: comparison of polymerase chain reaction and cell culture for diagnosis and follow-up.

Authors:  W H Vogels; P C van Voorst Vader; F P Schröder
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  16 in total

1.  Evaluation of the NucliSens Basic Kit for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in genital tract specimens using nucleic acid sequence-based amplification of 16S rRNA.

Authors:  J B Mahony; X Song; S Chong; M Faught; T Salonga; J Kapala
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  The Use of Molecular Techniques for the Diagnosis and Epidemiologic Study of Sexually Transmitted Infections.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.725

3.  Pooling cervical swabs and testing by ligase chain reaction are accurate and cost-saving strategies for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  J Kapala; D Copes; A Sproston; J Patel; D Jang; A Petrich; J Mahony; K Biers; M Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Chlamydia trachomatis diagnostics.

Authors:  M A Chernesky
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.519

5.  Evaluation of an automated liquid-handling system (Tecan Genesis RSP 100) in the Abbott LCx assay for Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  K L Hanson; C P Cartwright
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Rapid hybridization probe assay and PCR for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urinary tract infections: a prospective study.

Authors:  Maysaa El-Sayed; Wafaa Badwy; Adel Bakr
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 2.188

7.  Comparison of the PACE 2 assay, two amplification assays, and Clearview EIA for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in female endocervical and urine specimens.

Authors:  T L Lauderdale; L Landers; I Thorneycroft; K Chapin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  From the NIH: proceedings of a workshop on the importance of self-obtained vaginal specimens for detection of sexually transmitted infections.

Authors:  Marcia M Hobbs; Barbara van der Pol; Patricia Totten; Charlotte A Gaydos; Anna Wald; Terri Warren; Rachel L Winer; Robert L Cook; Carolyn D Deal; M Elizabeth Rogers; Julius Schachter; King K Holmes; David H Martin
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.830

9.  Performance of the APTIMA Combo 2 assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in female urine and endocervical swab specimens.

Authors:  C A Gaydos; T C Quinn; D Willis; A Weissfeld; E W Hook; D H Martin; D V Ferrero; J Schachter
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Accuracy of results obtained by performing a second ligase chain reaction assay and PCR analysis on urine samples with positive or near-cutoff results in the LCx test for Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  S Castriciano; K Luinstra; D Jang; J Patel; J Mahony; J Kapala; M Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.