Literature DB >> 9466747

Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by the Gen-Probe AMPLIFIED Chlamydia Trachomatis Assay (AMP CT) in urine specimens from men and women and endocervical specimens from women.

K A Crotchfelt1, B Pare, C Gaydos, T C Quinn.   

Abstract

Molecular biology-based amplification methods are significantly more sensitive than other methods for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. The performance characteristics of the new Gen-Probe AMPLIFIED Chlamydia Trachomatis Assay (AMP CT) with endocervical and urine specimens were compared to those of culture for patients attending two Baltimore City sexually transmitted disease clinics and a clinic for adolescents. AMP CT uses transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) and hybridization protection assay procedures to qualitatively detect C. trachomatis by targeting a 23S rRNA. Discrepant results between culture-negative and AMP CT-positive specimens were resolved by direct fluorescent-antibody staining of sedimented culture transport medium for elementary bodies and by TMA with 16S rRNA as a target. Following discrepant analysis, for 480 female urine specimens AMP CT had a sensitivity of 93.8% and a specificity of 100%. For 464 male urine specimens, the resolved sensitivity and specificity of AMP CT were 95.6 and 98.7%, respectively. For the 479 endocervical swab specimens the sensitivity of AMP CT was 100% and the specificity was 99.5%. Resolved culture sensitivities of AMP CT for female and male swab specimens were 52.3 and 58.9%, respectively. These results demonstrate that AMP CT is highly sensitive for the detection of C. trachomatis in endocervical specimens and in urine specimens from men and women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9466747      PMCID: PMC104548     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  20 in total

Review 1.  Clinical and laboratory considerations of culture vs antigen assays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis from genital specimens.

Authors:  J A Kellogg
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 2.  Laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of chlamydial infections.

Authors:  D Taylor-Robinson; B J Thomas
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1991-06

3.  Failure to detect Chlamydia trachomatis in cell culture by using a monoclonal antibody directed against the major outer membrane protein.

Authors:  J Boman; C Gaydos; P Juto; G Wadell; T C Quinn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  The effect of media and temperature on the storage of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  S L Aarnaes; E M Peterson; L M De La Maza
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Performance of a nonisotopic DNA probe for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital specimens.

Authors:  J A Kluytmans; H G Niesters; J W Mouton; W G Quint; J A Ijpelaar; J H Van Rijsoort-Vos; L Habbema; E Stolz; M F Michel; J H Wagenvoort
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis urethritis in men by polymerase chain reaction assay of first-catch urine.

Authors:  J E Bauwens; A M Clark; M J Loeffelholz; S A Herman; W E Stamm
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis endocervical infections by a commercial polymerase chain reaction assay.

Authors:  J E Bauwens; A M Clark; W E Stamm
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison of polymerase chain reaction, monoclonal antibody based enzyme immunoassay, and cell culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital specimens.

Authors:  C H Wu; M F Lee; S C Yin; D M Yang; S F Cheng
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.830

9.  Direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic men by using a rapid polymerase chain reaction assay.

Authors:  G Jaschek; C A Gaydos; L E Welsh; T C Quinn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 10.  Laboratory diagnosis of human chlamydial infections.

Authors:  R C Barnes
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 26.132

View more
  20 in total

1.  Ability of the digene hybrid capture II test to identify Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in cervical specimens.

Authors:  J Schachter; E W Hook; W M McCormack; T C Quinn; M Chernesky; S Chong; J I Girdner; P B Dixon; L DeMeo; E Williams; A Cullen; A Lorincz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of the NucliSens Basic Kit for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in genital tract specimens using nucleic acid sequence-based amplification of 16S rRNA.

Authors:  J B Mahony; X Song; S Chong; M Faught; T Salonga; J Kapala
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Mailed, home-obtained urine specimens: a reliable screening approach for detecting asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

Authors:  S A Morré; I G van Valkengoed; A de Jong; A J Boeke; J T van Eijk; C J Meijer; A J van den Brule
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Role of Fig2p in agglutination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Chong K Jue; Peter N Lipke
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2002-10

5.  Volume effect on sensitivity of nucleic acid amplification tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from females.

Authors:  Jeanne Moncada; Joan M Chow; Julius Schachter
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Comparison of an rRNA-based and DNA-based nucleic acid amplification test for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in trachoma.

Authors:  Jon L Yang; Julius Schachter; Jeanne Moncada; Dereje Habte; Mulat Zerihun; Jenafir I House; Zhaoxia Zhou; Kevin C Hong; Kathryn Maxey; Bruce D Gaynor; Thomas M Lietman
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Rapid hybridization probe assay and PCR for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urinary tract infections: a prospective study.

Authors:  Maysaa El-Sayed; Wafaa Badwy; Adel Bakr
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 2.188

8.  Comparison of the PACE 2 assay, two amplification assays, and Clearview EIA for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in female endocervical and urine specimens.

Authors:  T L Lauderdale; L Landers; I Thorneycroft; K Chapin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Prevalence of Chlamydia infection among women visiting a gynaecology outpatient department: evaluation of an in-house PCR assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  Achchhe L Patel; Divya Sachdev; Poonam Nagpal; Uma Chaudhry; Subash C Sonkar; Suman L Mendiratta; Daman Saluja
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 3.944

10.  Urine specimens from pregnant and nonpregnant women inhibitory to amplification of Chlamydia trachomatis nucleic acid by PCR, ligase chain reaction, and transcription-mediated amplification: identification of urinary substances associated with inhibition and removal of inhibitory activity.

Authors:  J Mahony; S Chong; D Jang; K Luinstra; M Faught; D Dalby; J Sellors; M Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.