Literature DB >> 9112111

Time-frequency distributions of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.

G Tognola1, F Grandori, P Ravazzani.   

Abstract

Emissions evoked by broad-band stimuli, such as clicks, show a 'frequency dispersion' reminiscent of the place-frequency distribution along the cochlea. Analysis of the time-frequency properties of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) is therefore of considerable interest due to their close relation with cochlear mechanisms. In particular, since OAEs in response to click stimuli are expected to evoke a cumulative response from the whole cochlea, the analysis of click-evoked OAEs can yield a global view of cochlear function. Wavelet analysis is performed to obtain time-frequency distributions of click-evoked OAEs at various intensity levels from normal ears. By means of the inverse wavelet transform, the recorded responses are decomposed into elementary components representing the contribution within a narrow frequency band to the cumulative OAE. The relationship between the frequency of the elementary components, latency and level of stimulation is described.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9112111     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(97)00007-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  19 in total

1.  Medial olivocochlear-induced transient-evoked otoacoustic emission amplitude shifts in individual subjects.

Authors:  Shawn S Goodman; Ian B Mertes; James D Lewis; Diana K Weissbeck
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-08-28

2.  Obtaining reliable phase-gradient delays from otoacoustic emission data.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Christopher Bergevin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  On the spatial distribution of the reflection sources of different latency components of otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Renata Sisto; Arturo Moleti; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Latency of tone-burst-evoked auditory brain stem responses and otoacoustic emissions: level, frequency, and rise-time effects.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Michael Argenyi; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Acoustic stimulation of human medial olivocochlear efferents reduces stimulus-frequency and click-evoked otoacoustic emission delays: Implications for cochlear filter bandwidths.

Authors:  Nikolas A Francis; John J Guinan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  The effect of stimulus bandwidth on the nonlinear-derived tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emission.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Shawn S Goodman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-23

7.  Basal contributions to short-latency transient-evoked otoacoustic emission components.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Shawn S Goodman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-11

8.  Localization of the Reflection Sources of Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions.

Authors:  A Moleti; R Sisto
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-09

9.  Relation Between Cochlear Mechanics and Performance of Temporal Fine Structure-Based Tasks.

Authors:  Sho Otsuka; Shigeto Furukawa; Shimpei Yamagishi; Koich Hirota; Makio Kashino
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-09-08

10.  Comparison of time-frequency methods for analyzing stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Milan Biswal; Srikanta K Mishra
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.