Literature DB >> 8422515

Cross-calibration of liquid and solid QCT calibration standards: corrections to the UCSF normative data.

K G Faulkner1, C C Glüer, S Grampp, H K Genant.   

Abstract

Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) has been shown to be a precise and sensitive method for evaluating spinal bone mineral density (BMD) and skeletal response to aging and therapy. Precise and accurate determination of BMD using QCT requires a calibration standard to compensate for and reduce the effects of beam-hardening artifacts and scanner drift. The first standards were based on dipotassium hydrogen phosphate (K2HPO4) solutions. Recently, several manufacturers have developed stable solid calibration standards based on calcium hydroxyapatite (CHA) in water-equivalent plastic. Due to differences in attenuating properties of the liquid and solid standards, the calibrated BMD values obtained with each system do not agree. In order to compare and interpret the results obtained on both systems, cross-calibration measurements were performed in phantoms and patients using the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) liquid standard and the Image Analysis (IA) solid standard on the UCSF GE 9800 CT scanner. From the phantom measurements, a highly linear relationship was found between the liquid- and solid-calibrated BMD values. No influence on the cross-calibration due to simulated variations in body size or vertebral fat content was seen, though a significant difference in the cross-calibration was observed between scans acquired at 80 and 140 kVp. From the patient measurements, a linear relationship between the liquid (UCSF) and solid (IA) calibrated values was derived for GE 9800 CT scanners at 80 kVp (IA = [1.15 x UCSF] - 7.32).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Musculoskeletal; NASA Discipline Number 26-10; NASA Program Space Physiology and Countermeasures; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8422515     DOI: 10.1007/bf01623175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  12 in total

1.  Models of spinal trabecular bone loss as determined by quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  J E Block; R Smith; C C Glueer; P Steiger; B Ettinger; H K Genant
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  The relationship of peripheral to axial bone density.

Authors:  P Schneider; W Börner; R B Mazess; H Barden
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1988-07

3.  Quantitative CT applications: comparison of current scanners.

Authors:  C E Cann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Quantitative bone mineral analysis using dual energy computed tomography.

Authors:  H K Genant; D Boyd
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1977 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  Mild versus definite osteoporosis: comparison of bone densitometry techniques using different statistical models.

Authors:  A F Heuck; J Block; C C Glueer; P Steiger; H K Genant
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Quantitative computed tomography of vertebral spongiosa: a sensitive method for detecting early bone loss after oophorectomy.

Authors:  H K Genant; C E Cann; B Ettinger; G S Gordan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 7.  Noninvasive measurements of bone mass, structure, and strength: current methods and experimental techniques.

Authors:  K G Faulkner; C C Glüer; S Majumdar; P Lang; K Engelke; H K Genant
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Localization of regional forearm bone loss from high resolution computed tomographic images.

Authors:  P Rüegsegger; E Durand; M A Dambacher
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Spinal bone mineral density measured with quantitative CT: effect of region of interest, vertebral level, and technique.

Authors:  P Steiger; J E Block; S Steiger; A F Heuck; A Friedlander; B Ettinger; S T Harris; C C Glüer; H K Genant
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Quantitative computed tomography for prediction of vertebral fracture risk.

Authors:  C E Cann; H K Genant; F O Kolb; B Ettinger
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Current methods and advances in bone densitometry.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; C C Gluer; S Majumdar; B A Blunt; H K Genant
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Application of polychromatic µCT for mineral density determination.

Authors:  W Zou; N Hunter; M V Swain
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  Spinal bone mineral assessment in postmenopausal women: a comparison between dual X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  W Yu; C C Glüer; S Grampp; M Jergas; T Fuerst; C Y Wu; Y Lu; B Fan; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Accuracy and the influence of marrow fat on quantitative CT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of the femoral neck in vitro.

Authors:  J W Kuiper; C van Kuijk; J L Grashuis; A G Ederveen; H E Schütte
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  The use of routine non density calibrated clinical computed tomography data as a potentially useful screening tool for identifying patients with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Christopher John Burke; Manjiri M Didolkar; Huiman X Barnhart; Emily N Vinson
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2016-10-05

Review 6.  Quality assurance of imaging techniques used in the clinical management of osteoporosis.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; J Damilakis; G Solomou; A Bazzocchi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  Changes in calibration standards for quantitative computed tomography: recommendations for clinical practice.

Authors:  C C Glüer; K Engelke; M Jergas; S Hagiwara; S Grampp; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  European semi-anthropomorphic spine phantom for the calibration of bone densitometers: assessment of precision, stability and accuracy. The European Quantitation of Osteoporosis Study Group.

Authors:  J Pearson; J Dequeker; M Henley; J Bright; J Reeve; W Kalender; A M Laval-Jeantet; P Rüegsegger; D Felsenberg; J Adams
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Left-right differences in the proximal femur's strength of post-menopausal women: a multicentric finite element study.

Authors:  F Taddei; C Falcinelli; L Balistreri; P Henys; F Baruffaldi; S Sigurdsson; V Gudnason; T B Harris; R Dietzel; G Armbrecht; S Boutroy; E Schileo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Race and ethnic variation in proximal femur structure and BMD among older men.

Authors:  Lynn M Marshall; Joseph M Zmuda; Benjamin Ks Chan; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Jane A Cauley; Kristine E Ensrud; Thomas F Lang; Eric S Orwoll
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.