Literature DB >> 1950872

Noninvasive measurements of bone mass, structure, and strength: current methods and experimental techniques.

K G Faulkner1, C C Glüer, S Majumdar, P Lang, K Engelke, H K Genant.   

Abstract

Current methods for assessing osteoporotic fracture risk involve measuring the content and/or density of bone at a number of skeletal sites and relating the measurement to that in either age-matched or young control subjects measured at the same site with the same technique. These densitometric methods have been used to predict several types of fractures; however, engineering principles verify that the bone structure and loading conditions also affect skeletal strength. Many densitometric measurements inherently contain information about skeletal structure and bone distribution, yet this information is not clinically used. In this paper, the currently available techniques for assessing bone content and density, namely, single-photon absorptiometry, dual-photon absorptiometry, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and quantitative CT, and their usefulness in assessing fracture risk and distinguishing between patients with and without osteoporosis are reviewed. Extensions of conventional densitometry that have been developed by several researchers to include information in addition to bone mass also are presented. Results from recent studies using new applications of ultrasound techniques and MR imaging are reviewed. Preliminary studies show the value of these new techniques in noninvasive measurement of bone structure in order to estimate bone strength and assess fracture risk more accurately. However, to become clinically useful, many of these methods require further investigation to increase their ease of use and decrease their cost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1950872     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.157.6.1950872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  16 in total

1.  Bone density at the os calcis: reference values, reproducibility, and effects of fracture history and physical activity.

Authors:  D J Chinn; J N Fordham; M S Kibirige; N J Crabtree; J Venables; J Bates; O Pitcher
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Volumetric bone mineral density using peripheral quantitative computed tomography in Japanese women.

Authors:  Y Hasegawa; K Kushida; K Yamazaki; T Inoue
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Heel ultrasound in women after long-term ERT compared with bone densities in the forearm, spine and hip.

Authors:  T Naessén; H Mallmin; S Ljunghall
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry is also an accurate and precise method to measure the dimensions of human long bones.

Authors:  H Sievänen; P Kannus; P Oja; I Vuori
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Interobserver variation in the detection of osteopenia by radiography and comparison with dual X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  M Jergas; M Uffmann; H Escher; C C Glüer; K C Young; S Grampp; O Köster; H K Genant
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Bone Regeneration of Hydroxyapatite with Granular Form or Porous Scaffold in Canine Alveolar Sockets.

Authors:  Seok Jin Jang; Se Eun Kim; Tae Sung Han; Jun Sik Son; Seong Soo Kang; Seok Hwa Choi
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  Compressive axial mechanical properties of rat bone as functions of bone volume fraction, apparent density and micro-ct based mineral density.

Authors:  Esther Cory; Ara Nazarian; Vahid Entezari; Vartan Vartanians; Ralph Müller; Brian D Snyder
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Influence of steroid medication on bone mineral density in children with nephrotic syndrome.

Authors:  B Lettgen; C Jeken; C Reiners
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.714

9.  Fracture of the distal forearm as a forecaster of subsequent hip fracture: a population-based cohort study with 24 years of follow-up.

Authors:  H Mallmin; S Ljunghall; I Persson; T Naessén; U B Krusemo; R Bergström
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  Correlation of bone mineral density and femoral neck hardness in bovine and human samples.

Authors:  J Houde; M Marchetti; J Duquette; A Hoffman; G Steinberg; G K Crane; D Baran
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.