Literature DB >> 8845596

Accuracy and the influence of marrow fat on quantitative CT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of the femoral neck in vitro.

J W Kuiper1, C van Kuijk, J L Grashuis, A G Ederveen, H E Schütte.   

Abstract

Bone mineral measurements with quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were compared with chemical analysis (ChA) to determine (1) the accuracy and (2) the influence of bone marrow fat. Total bone mass of 19 human femoral necks in vitro was determined with QCT and DXA before and after defatting. ChA consisted of defatting and decalcification of the femoral neck samples for determination of bone mineral mass (BmM) and amount of fat. The mean BmM was 4.49 g. Mean fat percentage was 37.2% (23.3%-48.5%). QCT, DXA and ChA before and after defatting were all highly correlated (r > 0.96, p < 0.0001). Before defatting the QCT values were on average 0.35 g less than BmM and the DXA values were on average 0.65 g less than BmM. After defatting, all bone mass values increased; QCT values were on average 0.30 g more than BmM and DXA values were 0.29 g less than BmM. It is concluded that bone mineral measurements of the femoral neck with QCT and DXA are highly correlated with the chemically determined bone mineral mass and that both techniques are influenced by the femoral fat content.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8845596     DOI: 10.1007/bf01626534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  22 in total

1.  Estimation of the magnitude of the error in bone mineral measurement due to fat: the effect of machine calibration.

Authors:  D W Pye
Journal:  Clin Phys Physiol Meas       Date:  1991-02

2.  Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry: the effects of beam hardening on bone density measurements.

Authors:  G M Blake; D B McKeeney; S C Chhaya; P J Ryan; I Fogelman
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Bone loss after locked intramedullary nailing. Computed tomography of the femur and tibia in 10 cases.

Authors:  M Bråten; A Nordby; T Terjesen; I Rossvoll
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1992-06

4.  Calibration of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for bone density.

Authors:  R B Mazess; J A Trempe; J P Bisek; J A Hanson; D Hans
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Bone mass distribution in the lower leg. A quantitative computed tomographic study of 36 individuals.

Authors:  A Alho; A Høiseth
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1991-10

6.  Influence of fat on bone measurements with dual-energy absorptiometry.

Authors:  T N Hangartner; C C Johnston
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1990-04

Review 7.  Quantitative CT for determination of bone mineral density: a review.

Authors:  C E Cann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Quantitative bone mineral analysis using dual energy computed tomography.

Authors:  H K Genant; D Boyd
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1977 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.016

9.  Quantitative histological studies on age changes in bone.

Authors:  M S Dunnill; J A Anderson; R Whitehead
Journal:  J Pathol Bacteriol       Date:  1967-10

10.  Cross-calibration of liquid and solid QCT calibration standards: corrections to the UCSF normative data.

Authors:  K G Faulkner; C C Glüer; S Grampp; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  17 in total

1.  Prevalence of osteoporosis using bone mineral measurements at the calcaneus by dual X-ray and laser (DXL).

Authors:  R Kullenberg; J A Falch
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Perspective: the bone-fat connection.

Authors:  Miriam A Bredella
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  [Absorptiometry].

Authors:  S Prevrhal
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 4.  Anabolic and antiresorptive therapy for osteoporosis: combination and sequential approaches.

Authors:  Felicia Cosman
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 5.  Combination therapy for osteoporosis: a reappraisal.

Authors:  Felicia Cosman
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2014-04-02

6.  Evaluation of cross-sectional and longitudinal changes in volumetric bone mineral density in postmenopausal women using single- versus dual-energy quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  Jad G Sfeir; Matthew T Drake; Elizabeth J Atkinson; Sara J Achenbach; Jon J Camp; Amanda J Tweed; Louise K McCready; Lifeng Yu; Mark C Adkins; Shreyasee Amin; Sundeep Khosla
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Thiazolidinediones and bone.

Authors:  Alberto Falchetti; Laura Masi; Maria Luisa Brandia
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2007-05

Review 8.  Unresolved issues in osteoporosis in men.

Authors:  E Seeman
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.514

9.  Use of dual-energy computed tomography to measure skeletal-wide marrow composition and cancellous bone mineral density.

Authors:  Luke Arentsen; Karen E Hansen; Masashi Yagi; Yutaka Takahashi; Ryan Shanley; Angela McArthur; Patrick Bolan; Taiki Magome; Douglas Yee; Jerry Froelich; Susanta K Hui
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 10.  New perspectives in echographic diagnosis of osteoporosis on hip and spine.

Authors:  Sergio Casciaro; Francesco Conversano; Paola Pisani; Maurizio Muratore
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2015-10-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.