Literature DB >> 3263892

The relationship of peripheral to axial bone density.

P Schneider1, W Börner, R B Mazess, H Barden.   

Abstract

Bone measurements were made in young normal women (n = 125) using single-photon absorptiometry (SPA with 125I) of the radius shaft and ultradistal radius, dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA with 153Gd) of the lumbar spine and the proximal femur, and 125I-based quantitative computed tomography (QCT) of the distal radius. Measurements of the appendicular and axial sites also were made in 21 women with spinal osteoporosis. The standard error of estimate in predicting axial densities from peripheral measurements was about 0.11 g/cm2 (10-13%) with all methods. The osteoporotic-normal difference was 21% for SPA of the radius shaft and 125I-QCT of the distal radius, 30% for the lumbar spine and 34% for the femoral neck. Prediction of spine and femur density, and diagnostic sensitivity, with 125I-QCT were equivalent to that obtained with conventional SPA, but the precision of 125I-QCT (0.8%) was 2-3 times better than both SPA and DPA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3263892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Miner        ISSN: 0169-6009


  9 in total

Review 1.  Current methods and advances in bone densitometry.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; C C Gluer; S Majumdar; B A Blunt; H K Genant
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Volumetric bone mineral density using peripheral quantitative computed tomography in Japanese women.

Authors:  Y Hasegawa; K Kushida; K Yamazaki; T Inoue
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Comparison of trabecular bone density at vertebral and radial sites using quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  Y Fujii; T Chikawa; T Nakamura; B Goto; T Fujita
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Dual photon absorptiometry of the proximal tibia.

Authors:  M M Checovich; B J Kiratli; E L Smith
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques.

Authors:  C C Glüer; G Blake; Y Lu; B A Blunt; M Jergas; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Bone densitometry: current assessment.

Authors:  H K Genant; K G Faulkner; C C Glüer; K Engelke
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Influence of steroid medication on bone mineral density in children with nephrotic syndrome.

Authors:  B Lettgen; C Jeken; C Reiners
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.714

8.  Forearm BMD as measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) in a German reference population.

Authors:  S Butz; C Wüster; C Scheidt-Nave; M Götz; R Ziegler
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Cross-calibration of liquid and solid QCT calibration standards: corrections to the UCSF normative data.

Authors:  K G Faulkner; C C Glüer; S Grampp; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.507

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.