Literature DB >> 2326479

Spinal bone mineral density measured with quantitative CT: effect of region of interest, vertebral level, and technique.

P Steiger1, J E Block, S Steiger, A F Heuck, A Friedlander, B Ettinger, S T Harris, C C Glüer, H K Genant.   

Abstract

This study documents the relationship between different vertebral bone compartments with quantitative computed tomography (CT). Four distinct patient groups were investigated: healthy pre- and early postmenopausal women as well as healthy and osteoporotic late postmenopausal women. Three different regions of interest (ROIs) were employed: the elliptical ROI located in the anterior trabecular portion of the vertebral body, the peeled ROI of irregular shape that circumscribes most of the trabecular bone, and the integral ROI including all bone except for the transverse processes. Both single- and dual-energy quantitative CT techniques were employed at T-12 through L-3. Correlation between measurements in the elliptical and peeled ROIs was high (r = .985). The authors concluded that either ROI is acceptable for clinical use. The decrements in bone mineral density (BMD) for the integral ROI were smaller than those for the elliptical ROI. Dual-energy measurements were consistently higher than single-energy measurements. BMD as a function of vertebral level decreased systematically from T-12 to L-3. However, the average density of T-12 through L-3 can be accurately predicted by the average density of L-1 and L-2 (r = .997). Precision did not deteriorate significantly when BMD was expressed as the average of L-1 and L-2 (1.5%) instead of T-12 through L-3 (1.4%). In this study the data suggest a modified quantitative CT protocol for clinical applications in which BMD of only L-1 and L-2 are measured at a fixed gantry tilt.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2326479     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.175.2.2326479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  28 in total

1.  MRI of bone marrow in the distal radius: in vivo precision of effective transverse relaxation times.

Authors:  S Grampp; S Majumdar; M Jergas; P Lang; A Gies; H K Genant
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Current methods and advances in bone densitometry.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; C C Gluer; S Majumdar; B A Blunt; H K Genant
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Phantomless calibration of CT scans for measurement of BMD and bone strength-Inter-operator reanalysis precision.

Authors:  David C Lee; Paul F Hoffmann; David L Kopperdahl; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Compact and trabecular components of the spine using quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  T Sandor; D Felsenberg; W A Kalender; A Clain; E Brown
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Normal bone density in Irish women: is American normative data suitable for use in Ireland?

Authors:  J Harbison; L Daly; B Murphy; C McCoy; J Masterson
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  Bone densitometry of excised vertebrae; anatomical relationships.

Authors:  R B Mazess; P Pedersen; J Vetter; H S Barden
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 7.  Bone imaging: traditional techniques and their interpretation.

Authors:  Holger F Boehm; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.096

8.  Degenerative changes at the lumbar spine--implications for bone mineral density measurement in elderly women.

Authors:  M Tenne; F McGuigan; J Besjakov; P Gerdhem; K Åkesson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques.

Authors:  C C Glüer; G Blake; Y Lu; B A Blunt; M Jergas; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Predicting vertebral fracture incidence from prevalent fractures and bone density among non-black, osteoporotic women.

Authors:  P D Ross; H K Genant; J W Davis; P D Miller; R D Wasnich
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.