Literature DB >> 3786773

Quantitative CT applications: comparison of current scanners.

C E Cann.   

Abstract

Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) has been used with variable success to measure the density of lung nodules, bone, and kidney stones and to determine volumes of tumor. Commercially available CT scanners vary in their ability to quantify high-atomic-number (high-Z) and low-Z components accurately and reproducibly. Sixteen models of CT scanners from eight manufacturers were compared as to their capability for QCT. Field uniformity was determined in phantoms simulating the human torso. For high-Z (250 HU) materials, the difference in CT numbers from the center to a radial distance of 13 cm ranged from 1 to 50 HU (mean, 15 HU); for water, the range was 0-15 HU. Accuracy of computed radiographic localizer systems ranged from +/- 0.5 to +/- 2.0 mm without gantry angulation and up to +/- 4 mm with an angled gantry. A variety of artifacts also reduced QCT accuracy and reproducibility. Thus, not all CT scanners are equally suited to QCT, and results on one machine may not be comparable to those of another unless correction factors are used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3786773     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.162.1.3786773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  16 in total

Review 1.  Current methods and advances in bone densitometry.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; C C Gluer; S Majumdar; B A Blunt; H K Genant
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Measurements of broadband ultrasonic attenuation in the calcaneus in premenopausal and postmenopausal women.

Authors:  R J Herd; T Ramalingham; P J Ryan; I Fogelman; G M Blake
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  The Effect of Quantitative Computed Tomography Acquisition Protocols on Bone Mineral Density Estimation.

Authors:  Hugo Giambini; Dan Dragomir-Daescu; Paul M Huddleston; Jon J Camp; Kai-Nan An; Ahmad Nassr
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 4.  Advances in noninvasive bone measurement.

Authors:  R B Mazess; H Barden; J Vetter; M Ettinger
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 5.  Quantitative computed tomography: update 1987.

Authors:  H K Genant; P Steiger; J E Block; C C Glueer; B Ettinger; S T Harris
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Precise measurement of vertebral bone density using computed tomography without the use of an external reference phantom.

Authors:  S D Boden; D J Goodenough; C D Stockham; E Jacobs; T Dina; R M Allman
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Age and gender-dependent bone density changes of the human skull disclosed by high-resolution flat-panel computed tomography.

Authors:  Christina Schulte-Geers; Martin Obert; René L Schilling; Sebastian Harth; Horst Traupe; Elke R Gizewski; Marcel A Verhoff
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 8.  Bone mass measurement, fracture risk, and screening for osteoporosis.

Authors:  D I Rosenthal; A N Tosteson
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 9.  Bone density measurements.

Authors:  E M Alhava
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  Differential effect of marrow adiposity and visceral and subcutaneous fat on cardiovascular risk in young, healthy adults.

Authors:  N Di Iorgi; S D Mittelman; V Gilsanz
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 5.095

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.