Literature DB >> 8695964

Spinal bone mineral assessment in postmenopausal women: a comparison between dual X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography.

W Yu1, C C Glüer, S Grampp, M Jergas, T Fuerst, C Y Wu, Y Lu, B Fan, H K Genant.   

Abstract

We compared quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) with respect to their ability to discriminate subjects with and without prevalent vertebral fractures. In 240 post-menopausal women (mean age 63.7 +/- 6.9 years) lateral spine radiographs (T4-L4) were reviewed for the presence of vertebral fracture. Using a semiquantitative technique to grade the severity of vertebral deformities, we classified fractures as mild, moderate or severe (grade 1 to 3, respectively). Postero-anterior DXA (PA-DXA) and lateral DXA (L-DXA) measurements (L2-4) as well as QCT measurements of the lumbar spine (T12-L3 or L1-14) were obtained in all women. Seventy-two women were diagnosed with at least one fracture, and of these 40 were graded as mild. Comparing normal women with fractured women, we found the area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves to be greatest for QCT (0.81), followed by L-DXA (0.72) and PA-DXA (0.65). The differences among all three techniques were significant. Comparing the normal women with women having only mild fractures, the areas under the ROC curves were 0.79, 0.73 and 0.63 for QCT, L-DXA and PA-DXA, respectively. Significant differences existed between QCT and PA-DXA as well as between L-DXA and PA-DXA. Logistic regression analysis also revealed the highest age-adjusted odds ratios for QCT (3.67; 2.25-5.97) while L-DXA and PA-DXA showed substantially lower odds ratios (2.00; 1.39-2.87, and 1.54; 1.11-2.15, respectively). We conclude that low bone density as measured by QCT, PA-DXA or L-DXA is significantly associated with the prevalence of vertebral fractures. Of the methods studied, QCT of trabecular bone offered the best discriminatory capability. L-DXA proved to be superior to PA-DXA in its diagnostic sensitivity, particularly in women with mild fracture. Mild vertebral fractures are associated with decreased spinal bone density and may be regarded as osteoporotic deformities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8695964     DOI: 10.1007/bf01626604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  29 in total

1.  Lateral dual-photon absorptiometry: a new technique to measure the bone mineral density at the lumbar spine.

Authors:  D Uebelhart; F Duboeuf; P J Meunier; P D Delmas
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  A comparison of quantitative dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry and dual photon absorptiometry of the lumbar spine in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  L Strause; M Bracker; P Saltman; D Sartoris; E Kerr
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women.

Authors:  L J Melton; S H Kan; M A Frye; H W Wahner; W M O'Fallon; B L Riggs
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Mild versus definite osteoporosis: comparison of bone densitometry techniques using different statistical models.

Authors:  A F Heuck; J Block; C C Glueer; P Steiger; H K Genant
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 5.  Bone density measurements.

Authors:  E M Alhava
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 6.  Radiologic diagnosis of osteoporosis. Current methods and perspectives.

Authors:  S Grampp; M Jergas; C C Glüer; P Lang; P Brastow; H K Genant
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.303

7.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Methods of determining bone mass.

Authors:  S M Ott
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Bone mass, bone structure and vertebral fractures in osteoporotic patients.

Authors:  J Pøodenphant; V A Nielsen; B J Riis; A Gotfredsen; C Christiansen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Dual energy radiography versus quantitative computer tomography for the diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  R Pacifici; R Rupich; M Griffin; A Chines; N Susman; L V Avioli
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.958

View more
  35 in total

1.  Body mass index and bone loss among postmenopausal women: the 10-year follow-up of the OSTPRE cohort.

Authors:  Jarmo Saarelainen; Vesa Kiviniemi; Heikki Kröger; Marjo Tuppurainen; Leo Niskanen; Jukka Jurvelin; Risto Honkanen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  [Introduction to the topic: diagnosis of osteoporosis - a paradigm shift].

Authors:  T M Link; H Imhof
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Reconsideration of the relevance of mild wedge or short vertebral height deformities across a broad age distribution.

Authors:  W Yu; Q Lin; X Zhou; H Shao; P Sun
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Measurement of subregional vertebral bone mineral density in vitro using lateral projection dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: validation with peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  Andrew M Briggs; Egon Perilli; Ian H Parkinson; Susan Kantor; Tim V Wrigley; Nicola L Fazzalari; John D Wark
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Advances in the noninvasive assessment of bone density, quality, and structure.

Authors:  H K Genant; T F Lang; K Engelke; T Fuerst; C Glüer; S Majumdar; M Jergas
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Correlations of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, quantitative computed tomography, and single photon absorptiometry with spinal and non-spinal fractures.

Authors:  F W Lafferty; D Y Rowland
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Changes in trabecular bone density in incident pediatric Crohn's disease: a comparison of imaging methods.

Authors:  A Tsampalieros; M K Berkenstock; B S Zemel; L Griffin; J Shults; J M Burnham; R N Baldassano; M B Leonard
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Degenerative changes at the lumbar spine--implications for bone mineral density measurement in elderly women.

Authors:  M Tenne; F McGuigan; J Besjakov; P Gerdhem; K Åkesson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  Quantitative imaging methods in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Ling Oei; Fjorda Koromani; Fernando Rivadeneira; M Carola Zillikens; Edwin H G Oei
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-12

10.  Differences in hip quantitative computed tomography (QCT) measurements of bone mineral density and bone strength between glucocorticoid-treated and glucocorticoid-naive postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Kuo-Chiang Lian; Thomas F Lang; Joyce H Keyak; Gunnard W Modin; Qaisar Rehman; Loi Do; Nancy E Lane
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-09-28       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.