UNLABELLED: Femoral neck dimensions and vBMD from QCT were compared among 3,305 black, Asian, Hispanic, and white men >or=65 yr of age. All had similar stature-adjusted mean femoral neck volume, but black and Asian men had thicker cortices and higher trabecular vBMD, which may increase bone strength. INTRODUCTION: Hip fracture rates among elderly U.S. black and Asian men are lower than rates among white men. Structural characteristics or volumetric BMD (vBMD), which confer advantages for femoral neck bone strength, may vary by race/ethnicity. However, this topic has not been studied in detail. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, dimensions and vBMD in the femoral neck and shaft were obtained from QCT scans among 3,305 men >or=65 yr of age in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) study. Femoral neck measures were cross-sectional area; integral, cortical, and medullary volumes and integral, cortical, and trabecular vBMD. Shaft measures were cross-sectional, cortical, and medullary areas and cortical vBMD. Self-reported race/ethnicity was classified as black, Asian, Hispanic, or white. We used multivariable linear regression models with adjustment for age, height, and body mass index to compare means of the outcome measures in black, Asian, and Hispanic men to those in whites. RESULTS: All groups had similar femoral neck integral volume. Among black and Asian men, mean cortical volume as a percent of integral volume was 6% greater, integral vBMD was 6-10% greater, and trabecular vBMD was 33-36% greater than means among whites. Shaft cross-sectional area was similar among blacks, but smaller among Asians, compared with whites. However, mean shaft cortical area was greater among blacks but similar among Asians and whites, resulting in mean cortical thickness being 5% greater among black and Asian men. Blacks also had greater mean cortical vBMD in both the femoral neck and shaft. CONCLUSIONS: Black and Asian men >or=65 yr of age have features in the proximal femur that may confer advantages for bone strength. Specifically, greater cortical thickness and higher trabecular vBMD among black and Asian men could help explain the lower hip fracture rates in these populations. Discerning the mechanisms underlying these differences could provide advances for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.
UNLABELLED: Femoral neck dimensions and vBMD from QCT were compared among 3,305 black, Asian, Hispanic, and white men >or=65 yr of age. All had similar stature-adjusted mean femoral neck volume, but black and Asian men had thicker cortices and higher trabecular vBMD, which may increase bone strength. INTRODUCTION:Hip fracture rates among elderly U.S. black and Asian men are lower than rates among white men. Structural characteristics or volumetric BMD (vBMD), which confer advantages for femoral neck bone strength, may vary by race/ethnicity. However, this topic has not been studied in detail. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, dimensions and vBMD in the femoral neck and shaft were obtained from QCT scans among 3,305 men >or=65 yr of age in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) study. Femoral neck measures were cross-sectional area; integral, cortical, and medullary volumes and integral, cortical, and trabecular vBMD. Shaft measures were cross-sectional, cortical, and medullary areas and cortical vBMD. Self-reported race/ethnicity was classified as black, Asian, Hispanic, or white. We used multivariable linear regression models with adjustment for age, height, and body mass index to compare means of the outcome measures in black, Asian, and Hispanic men to those in whites. RESULTS: All groups had similar femoral neck integral volume. Among black and Asian men, mean cortical volume as a percent of integral volume was 6% greater, integral vBMD was 6-10% greater, and trabecular vBMD was 33-36% greater than means among whites. Shaft cross-sectional area was similar among blacks, but smaller among Asians, compared with whites. However, mean shaft cortical area was greater among blacks but similar among Asians and whites, resulting in mean cortical thickness being 5% greater among black and Asian men. Blacks also had greater mean cortical vBMD in both the femoral neck and shaft. CONCLUSIONS: Black and Asian men >or=65 yr of age have features in the proximal femur that may confer advantages for bone strength. Specifically, greater cortical thickness and higher trabecular vBMD among black and Asian men could help explain the lower hip fracture rates in these populations. Discerning the mechanisms underlying these differences could provide advances for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.
Authors: V Bousson; C Bergot; A Meunier; F Barbot; C Parlier-Cuau; A M Laval-Jeantet; J D Laredo Journal: Radiology Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Asha George; J Kathleen Tracy; Walter A Meyer; Raymond H Flores; P David Wilson; Marc C Hochberg Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: L J Melton III; M A Marquez; S J Achenbach; A Tefferi; M K O'Connor; W M O'Fallon; B L Riggs Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Yahtyng Sheu; Jane A Cauley; Clareann H Bunker; Victor W Wheeler; Alan L Patrick; Christopher L Gordon; Candace M Kammerer; Joseph M Zmuda Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Didier Chalhoub; Robert Boudreau; Susan Greenspan; Anne B Newman; Joseph Zmuda; Andrew W Frank-Wilson; Nayana Nagaraj; Andrew R Hoffman; Nancy E Lane; Marcia L Stefanick; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Tien Dam; Peggy M Cawthon; Eric S Orwoll; Jane A Cauley Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2018-06-12 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: M D Walker; S Shi; J J Russo; X S Liu; B Zhou; C Zhang; G Liu; D J McMahon; J P Bilezikian; X E Guo Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2014-07-29 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: X Sherry Liu; Marcella D Walker; Donald J McMahon; Julia Udesky; George Liu; John P Bilezikian; X Edward Guo Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: S J Warden; K M Hill; A J Ferira; E M Laing; B R Martin; D B Hausman; C M Weaver; M Peacock; R D Lewis Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2012-10-24 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Andre B Araujo; Gretchen R Chiu; Varant Kupelian; Susan A Hall; Rachel E Williams; Richard V Clark; John B McKinlay Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-08-21 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: H-S Nam; M-H Shin; J M Zmuda; P C Leung; E Barrett-Connor; E S Orwoll; J A Cauley Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2010-03-04 Impact factor: 4.507