Literature DB >> 2610023

Mild versus definite osteoporosis: comparison of bone densitometry techniques using different statistical models.

A F Heuck1, J Block, C C Glueer, P Steiger, H K Genant.   

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the ability of three bone densitometry techniques to discriminate subjects with mild vertebral deformities from those with definite compression fractures. We determined bone mineral density (BMD) in 68 postmenopausal women by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA) of the spine, as well as single-photon absorptiometry (SPA) of the radius. Forty four individuals were classified as having mild deformities of the spine and 24 were considered to have definite vertebral compressions. Several statistical approaches were used to compare these subgroups and to estimate the relative risk of vertebral fracture. Included among these were percent decrements and zeta-scores, ROC curves, odds ratio estimations, and logistic regression analysis. Individuals with definite vertebral fractures had lower bone mineral density at all sites, but measurement of radial compact bone by SPA failed to reach significance. Using ROC analysis to distinguish mild deformities from true compressions, we found that measurement of spinal trabecular bone by QCT to be the most sensitive discriminator; although measurement of spinal integral bone by DPA also gave satisfactory discrimination, whereas assessment of radial compact bone did not adequately differentiate patients with mild deformities from those with definite compressions. Likewise, we found determination of spinal trabecular bone to be the most robust predictor of relative risk of definite fracture using either odds ratios or logistic regression analysis. Measurement of BMD in the peripheral cortical skeleton offered no predictive power for true vertebral fracture. We concluded that direct assessment of the spine, particularly of the trabecular portion, offered the strongest discrimination and relative risk prediction for definite osteoporotic fractures compared with milder forms of this condition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2610023     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650040614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  17 in total

1.  Spinal bone mineral assessment in postmenopausal women: a comparison between dual X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  W Yu; C C Glüer; S Grampp; M Jergas; T Fuerst; C Y Wu; Y Lu; B Fan; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Estimation of bone mineral density in children from diagnostic CT images: a comparison of methods with and without an internal calibration standard.

Authors:  Alexander H Habashy; Xiaowei Yan; J Keenan Brown; Xiaoping Xiong; Sue C Kaste
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Reconsideration of the relevance of mild wedge or short vertebral height deformities across a broad age distribution.

Authors:  W Yu; Q Lin; X Zhou; H Shao; P Sun
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Measurement of bone mineral density.

Authors:  C Hassager; C Christiansen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 5.  Bone densitometry: current assessment.

Authors:  H K Genant; K G Faulkner; C C Glüer; K Engelke
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis research.

Authors:  H K Genant; M Jergas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-03-12       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  New imaging modalities in bone.

Authors:  James F Griffith; Harry K Genant
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 8.  When bone mass fails to predict bone failure.

Authors:  S M Ott
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Relationship between NMR transverse relaxation, trabecular bone architecture, and strength.

Authors:  H Chung; F W Wehrli; J L Williams; S D Kugelmass
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Spine and femur BMD by DXA in patients with varying severity spinal osteoporosis.

Authors:  P J Ryan; G M Blake; R Herd; J Parker; I Fogelman
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.