Literature DB >> 7734527

A test pattern for quality control of laser scanner and charge-coupled device film digitizers.

E J Halpern1.   

Abstract

Although clinical images provide the ultimate test of diagnostic performance for a film digitizer, such images are not generally suitable for daily quality control (QC) purposes. However, a well-designed test pattern will provide a rapid, comprehensive, objective and reproducible assessment of image quality. This pattern should evaluate various parameters of image quality, including high contrast resolution, low contrast discrimination, linearity of gray scale, geometric distortion, and noise. Furthermore, the pattern should detect light leak and film slippage, two problems commonly associated with film digitizers. The test pattern described in this manuscript was designed to provide quantitative measures of performance for a film digitizer. As part of a regular QC routine for a laser scanner or charge-coupled device digitizer, this pattern provides a simple method to identify and quantify changes in digital image quality.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7734527     DOI: 10.1007/bf03168050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  10 in total

1.  Performance tests and quality control of cathode ray tube displays.

Authors:  H Roehrig; H Blume; T L Ji; M Browne
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Detection of pneumothorax: comparison of digital and conventional chest imaging.

Authors:  L L Fajardo; B J Hillman; G D Pond; R F Carmody; J E Johnson; W R Ferrell
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Image calibration of laser digitizers, printers, and gray-scale displays.

Authors:  E L Siegel; A W Templeton; L T Cook; D A Eckard; L A Harrison; S J Dwyer
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  Evaluation of teleradiology for interpretation of intravenous urograms.

Authors:  E J Halpern; J H Newhouse; E S Amis; H W Lubetsky; R M Jaffe; P D Esser; P O Alderson
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Receiver operating characteristic analysis of chest image interpretation with conventional, laser-printed, and high-resolution workstation images.

Authors:  B S Slasky; D Gur; W F Good; M A Costa-Greco; K M Harris; L A Cooperstein; H E Rockette
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  An improved phantom for quality control of laser scanner digitizers in picture archival and communications systems.

Authors:  E J Halpern; P D Esser
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Test pattern for video displays and hard-copy cameras.

Authors:  J E Gray; K G Lisk; D H Haddick; J H Harshbarger; A Oosterhof; R Schwenker
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Receiver operating characteristic analysis of fracture and pneumonia detection: comparison of laser-digitized workstation images and conventional analog radiographs.

Authors:  S J Ackerman; J N Gitlin; R W Gayler; C D Flagle; R N Bryan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Film density calibration for computed radiography systems: is the standard three-point procedure accurate?

Authors:  W Huda; Z Jing; B A Hoyle
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Subjective and objective assessment of image quality--a comparison.

Authors:  W F Good; D Gur; J H Feist; F L Thaete; C R Fuhrman; C A Britton; B S Slasky
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.056

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  The laser film digitizer: density, contrast, and resolution.

Authors:  T N Teslow
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Quality assurance and quality control of an intensive care unit picture archiving and communication system.

Authors:  D M Tucker; M McEachern
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.056

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.