Literature DB >> 8075187

Subjective and objective assessment of image quality--a comparison.

W F Good1, D Gur, J H Feist, F L Thaete, C R Fuhrman, C A Britton, B S Slasky.   

Abstract

Forced-choice just noticeable difference (JND) studies are extremely sensitive to image quality variations that are below the threshold at which the differences are apparent to or definable by the observer. Paired comparisons of 4K and 2K laser-printed posteroanterior chest images consistently demonstrated that although images are viewed as comparable by radiologists, when forced to choose the better ("sharper") image, they actually select the higher-resolution images in 83% of the paired observations. We conclude that small differences in image quality may be detectable even in image sets which are considered to be comparable by subjective assessments.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8075187     DOI: 10.1007/bf03168426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  3 in total

1.  Detection of pneumothorax: comparison of digital and conventional chest imaging.

Authors:  L L Fajardo; B J Hillman; G D Pond; R F Carmody; J E Johnson; W R Ferrell
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Chest radiography: comparison of high-resolution digital displays with conventional and digital film.

Authors:  G G Cox; L T Cook; J H McMillan; S J Rosenthal; S J Dwyer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Receiver operating characteristic analysis of chest image interpretation with conventional, laser-printed, and high-resolution workstation images.

Authors:  B S Slasky; D Gur; W F Good; M A Costa-Greco; K M Harris; L A Cooperstein; H E Rockette
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 11.105

  3 in total
  6 in total

1.  Quality degradation in lossy wavelet image compression.

Authors:  Tzong-Jer Chen; Keh-Shih Chuang; Jay Wu; Sharon C Chen; Ing-Ming Hwang; Meei-Ling Jan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2003-10-02       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  An ROC study of chest radiographs: 2K Versus 4K high-resolution soft-copy images.

Authors:  Su Young Kim; Yoon Joon Hwang; Yoon Hee Han; Jung Wook Seo; Ji Young Lee; Yong Hoon Kim; Soon Joo Cha; Gham Hur; Sung Soon Lee
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Two K versus 4 K storage phosphor chest radiography: detection performance and image quality.

Authors:  Claus Koelblinger; Mathias Prokop; Michael Weber; Johannes Sailer; Fabiola Cartes-Zumelzu; Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Subjective quality assessment of computed radiography hand images.

Authors:  C A Britton; O F Gabriele; T S Chang; J D Towers; D A Rubin; W F Good; D Gur
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Forced choice and ordinal discrete rating assessment of image quality: a comparison.

Authors:  D Gur; D A Rubin; B H Kart; A M Peterson; C R Fuhrman; H E Rockette; J L King
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  A test pattern for quality control of laser scanner and charge-coupled device film digitizers.

Authors:  E J Halpern
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.056

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.