Literature DB >> 9268857

The laser film digitizer: density, contrast, and resolution.

T N Teslow1.   

Abstract

This work evaluates differences in density linearity, contrast, and resolution of digital images acquired from a laser film scanner. A calibrated photographic step tablet tested linearity of diffuse optical density (OD). It was digitized within center openings of a dark and light film. The 14- x 17-inch films were scanned into 1024 x 1280 picture elements of 8 bits. A photographic tapered resolution guide evaluated the scanner's detail resolution. A single characteristic curve adequately represents the rate of change of OD per pixel value, but two piecewise linear functions are better. One ranges in light OD and a second in dark OD. Contrast shows a steeper slope in a light film rather than a dark film, yet a greater difference exists between two identical digitizers. The resolution test diminishes at 1.3 line pairs per mm (LP/mm), which compares to a Nyquist limit of 1.44 LP/mm. Such density, contrast, and resolution tests yield a benchmark to assure quality operations.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9268857      PMCID: PMC3452839          DOI: 10.1007/bf03168675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  8 in total

1.  Image calibration of laser digitizers, printers, and gray-scale displays.

Authors:  E L Siegel; A W Templeton; L T Cook; D A Eckard; L A Harrison; S J Dwyer
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 5.333

2.  Performance characteristics and image fidelity of gray-scale monitors.

Authors:  S J Dwyer; B K Stewart; J W Sayre; D R Aberle; M I Boechat; J C Honeyman; J M Boehme; H Roehrig; T L Ji; G J Blaine
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  Evaluation of imaging properties of a laser film digitizer.

Authors:  F F Yin; M L Giger; K Doi; H Yoshimura; X W Xu; R M Nishikawa
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  An improved phantom for quality control of laser scanner digitizers in picture archival and communications systems.

Authors:  E J Halpern; P D Esser
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Tests for evaluating laser film digitizers.

Authors:  R J Meeder; D A Jaffray; P Munro
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Test pattern for video displays and hard-copy cameras.

Authors:  J E Gray; K G Lisk; D H Haddick; J H Harshbarger; A Oosterhof; R Schwenker
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  A teleradiology case conference system.

Authors:  T N Teslow; R A Gilbert; W H Grant; S Y Woo; E B Butler; J H Liem
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 6.184

8.  A test pattern for quality control of laser scanner and charge-coupled device film digitizers.

Authors:  E J Halpern
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.056

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Utilization of DICOM GSDF to modify lookup tables for images acquired on film digitizers.

Authors:  David M Jones
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Evaluating noise in digitized radiographic images by means of histogram.

Authors:  Izabel Regina Fischer Rubira-Bullen; Maurício Cunha Escarpinati; Homero Schiabel; Marcelo Andrade da Costa Vieira; Cássia Maria Fischer Rubira; José Roberto Pereira Lauris
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.698

3.  Digitizing radiographic films: a simple way to evaluate indirect digital images.

Authors:  Izabel Regina Fischer Rubia-Bullen; Maurício Cunha Escarpinati; Homero Schiabel; Marcelo Andrade da Costa Vieira; Cássia Maria Fischer Rubira; José Roberto Pereira Lauris
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.698

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.