Literature DB >> 1623038

Evaluation of teleradiology for interpretation of intravenous urograms.

E J Halpern1, J H Newhouse, E S Amis, H W Lubetsky, R M Jaffe, P D Esser, P O Alderson.   

Abstract

The diagnostic yield of a commercial teleradiology/picture archiving and communication system (ATT-Philips Comm View T/PACS) was evaluated for 100 urograms. A single image from each examination was digitized (2048 x 1684 x 12-bit pixels) and transmitted from a satellite hospital over a T-1 line using the T/PACS system. The video display of each digitized image was reviewed independently by four radiologists. The same four radiologists reviewed the original film images at a different time without knowledge of their T/PACS interpretation. There was no statistically significant difference in the sensitivity for clinical findings between T/PACS (86%) and film (89%). The false positive rate, however, was significantly higher with T/PACS than with film (44 versus 32 false positive findings per 100 films). We conclude that T/PACS of the type studied here demonstrates sufficient sensitivity for the detection of clinically important urographic findings in the emergency setting. A final reading of the original films is still necessary, however, to assure appropriate specificity.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1623038     DOI: 10.1007/bf03167834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  10 in total

1.  A quality-control phantom for digitization of radiographs.

Authors:  E J Halpern; P D Esser; E L Nickoloff; P O Alderson
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Receiver operating characteristic analysis of chest image interpretation with conventional, laser-printed, and high-resolution workstation images.

Authors:  B S Slasky; D Gur; W F Good; M A Costa-Greco; K M Harris; L A Cooperstein; H E Rockette
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Digital skeletal radiography: spatial resolution requirements for detection of subperiosteal resorption.

Authors:  M D Murphey
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  The digital imaging workstation.

Authors:  R L Arenson; D P Chakraborty; S B Seshadri; H L Kundel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Comparison of 2048-line digital display formats and conventional radiographs: an ROC study.

Authors:  A Hayrapetian; D R Aberle; H K Huang; R Fiske; C Morioka; D Valentino; M I Boechat
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Evaluation of a quadtree-based compression algorithm with digitized urograms.

Authors:  E J Halpern; J H Newhouse; E S Amis; H M Levy; H W Lubetsky
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Digital gastrointestinal imaging: the effect of pixel size on detection of subtle mucosal abnormalities.

Authors:  D J Kastan; L V Ackerman; P J Feczko
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Excretory urography using computed radiography.

Authors:  L L Fajardo; B J Hillman; T B Hunter; H R Claypool; B R Westerman; B Mockbee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Digital mammography. ROC studies of the effects of pixel size and unsharp-mask filtering on the detection of subtle microcalcifications.

Authors:  H P Chan; C J Vyborny; H MacMahon; C E Metz; K Doi; E A Sickles
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 6.016

10.  Excretory urography in the emergency department: utility of teleradiology.

Authors:  D J DiSantis; M S Cramer; J C Scatarige
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 11.105

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  A test pattern for quality control of laser scanner and charge-coupled device film digitizers.

Authors:  E J Halpern
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.056

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.