Literature DB >> 8416576

Receiver operating characteristic analysis of fracture and pneumonia detection: comparison of laser-digitized workstation images and conventional analog radiographs.

S J Ackerman1, J N Gitlin, R W Gayler, C D Flagle, R N Bryan.   

Abstract

Forty pneumonia and 40 fracture cases were matched by patient age and gender with normal cases. Pediatric cases constituted 25% of this sample. All 160 examinations were laser-digitized at a spot size of 210 microns, a contrast resolution of 12 bits, and a spatial resolution of 2.35 line pairs per millimeter. The digitized images were transmitted 5 miles over a dedicated telephone line at a T1 rate from Francis Scott Key Hospital to Johns Hopkins Hospital (both in Baltimore, Md). At Johns Hopkins Hospital, eight radiologists interpreted the original analog radiograph and corresponding soft-copy display (1,280 x 1,024 pixels). Findings, confidence ratings, and image quality were reported for each reading. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to compare observer performance under the analog and digital reading conditions. The overall sensitivity of the analog method was 89% versus 78% for the digital method (P < .001), while the specificity values were 96% and 92%, respectively (P > .20). ROC analysis similarly indicated a statistically significant difference in favor of analog radiographs (P = .028).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8416576     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.186.1.8416576

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  10 in total

1.  A comparative study of conventional mammography film interpretations with soft copy readings of the same examinations.

Authors:  Joseph N Gitlin; Anand K Narayan; Chad A Mitchell; Ali M Akmal; David J Eisner; Lindsy M Peterson; Daisy Nie; Tyler R McClintock
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Comparison of a PACS workstation with laser hard copies for detecting scaphoid fractures in the emergency department.

Authors:  W Khaliq; C J Blakeley; S Maheshwaran; K Hashemi; P Redman
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Clinical trials to validate telemedicine.

Authors:  E G Tangalos
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  MR teleradiology network serving remote imaging centers.

Authors:  M C Davis
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Radiology services for remote communities: cost minimisation study of telemedicine.

Authors:  P A Halvorsen; I S Kristiansen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-05-25

6.  Digital radiology in skeletal trauma: assessment of casualty officers' performance.

Authors:  J H Gillard; C Hubbard; R Das; H Sherriff
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  A test pattern for quality control of laser scanner and charge-coupled device film digitizers.

Authors:  E J Halpern
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  SCAR R&D Symposium 2003: comparing the efficacy of 5-MP CRT versus 3-MP LCD in the evaluation of interstitial lung disease.

Authors:  Steve Langer; Brian Bartholmai; Ken Fetterly; Scott Harmsen; William Ryan; Brad Erickson; Kathy Andriole; John Carrino
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-06-29       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 9.  Telemedicine protocols and standards: development and implementation.

Authors:  B A Houtchens; A Allen; T P Clemmer; D A Lindberg; S Pedersen
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.460

10.  Diagnostic usefulness of chest computed radiography--film versus cathode-ray tube images.

Authors:  T Ishigaki; S Sakuma; T Endo; M Ikeda
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.056

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.