Literature DB >> 2085547

Performance tests and quality control of cathode ray tube displays.

H Roehrig1, H Blume, T L Ji, M Browne.   

Abstract

Spatial resolution, noise, characteristic curve, and absolute luminance are the essential parameters that describe physical image quality of a display. This paper presents simple procedures for assessing the performance of a cathode ray tube (CRT) in terms of these parameters as well as easy set up techniques. The procedures can be used in the environment where the CRT is used. The procedures are based on a digital representation of the Society of Motion Pictures and Television Engineers pattern plus a few simple other digital patterns. Additionally, measurement techniques are discussed for estimating brightness uniformity, veiling glare, and distortion. Apart from the absolute luminance, all performance features can be assessed with an uncalibrated photodetector and the eyes of a human observer. The measurement techniques especially enable the user to perform comparisons of different display systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2085547     DOI: 10.1007/BF03167599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  4 in total

1.  Cathode-ray tube displays for medical imaging.

Authors:  P A Keller
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Comparison of 2048-line digital display formats and conventional radiographs: an ROC study.

Authors:  A Hayrapetian; D R Aberle; H K Huang; R Fiske; C Morioka; D Valentino; M I Boechat
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Effect of noise on the modulation transfer function of the visual channel.

Authors:  H Pollehn; H Roehrig
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1970-06

4.  Test pattern for video displays and hard-copy cameras.

Authors:  J E Gray; K G Lisk; D H Haddick; J H Harshbarger; A Oosterhof; R Schwenker
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 11.105

  4 in total
  14 in total

1.  Characterization of monochrome CRT display systems in the field.

Authors:  H Roehrig; C E Willis; M A Damento
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Iterative interim techniques for reduced costs and a better mammography workstation: an opinion.

Authors:  D V Beard
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Proposal of a quality-index or metric for soft copy display systems: contrast sensitivity study.

Authors:  Jihong Wang; Ken Compton; Qi Peng
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2003-09-11       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Frequency and impact of high-resolution monitor failure in a filmless imaging department.

Authors:  E L Siegel; B I Reiner; M Cadogan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Hardware and software requirements for a picture archiving and communication system's diagnostic workstations.

Authors:  D R Haynor; D V Smith; H W Park; Y Kim
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Characterization of microcalcification: can digital monitor zooming replace magnification mammography in full-field digital mammography?

Authors:  Min Jung Kim; Eun-Kyung Kim; Jin Young Kwak; Eun Ju Son; Ji Hyun Youk; Seon Hyeong Choi; Mooyoung Han; Ki Keun Oh
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-08-02       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Contrast sensitivity of digital imaging display systems: contrast threshold dependency on object type and implications for monitor quality assurance and quality control in PACS.

Authors:  Jihong Wang; Jun Xu; Veera Baladandayuthapani
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  An improved phantom for quality control of laser scanner digitizers in picture archival and communications systems.

Authors:  E J Halpern; P D Esser
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Image Quality of CRT displays and the effect of brightness of diagnosis of mammograms.

Authors:  H Roehrig; E Krupinski
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 10.  A brief review of human perception factors in digital displays for picture archiving and communications systems.

Authors:  J Wang; S Langer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.056

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.