Literature DB >> 8573625

Quality assurance and quality control of an intensive care unit picture archiving and communication system.

D M Tucker1, M McEachern.   

Abstract

Most radiology departments have established quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) programs for conventional film-based image management systems. At many institutions, digital image management systems, or picture archiving and communication systems (PACS), are replacing part or all of the film management system. In these situations, it is important to control the quality of the digital images that are produced. The observed frequency of eight types of image-related errors occurring on an image viewing station located in a medical intensive care unit is reported. Images on the viewing station were checked for 12 consecutive weeks. Film images available in the radiology reading room and digital images on the viewing station were compared with a list of completed examinations produced by the radiological information system. Overall, 1,082 patient examinations were encountered. Seventy-six images (7.02% of all images) were observed with errors. In addition, four previously unencountered types of errors were observed in 11 images (1.01% of all images). The majority of the errors are attributed to interfaces either between information systems or between the PACS and the user. It is concluded that QA-QC procedures are necessary for PACS, and that good interfaces, both between information systems and between humans and computer systems, are essential for successful PACS implementations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8573625     DOI: 10.1007/bf03168715

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  13 in total

1.  Initial experience with automatic image transmission to an intensive care unit using Picture Archiving and Communications System technology.

Authors:  C E Ravin
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Adding a microcomputer bar-code network to a minicomputer-based radiology information system.

Authors:  G David; S Gregory
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Effect of a digital imaging network on physician behavior in an intensive care unit.

Authors:  D N De Simone; H L Kundel; R L Arenson; S B Seshadri; I S Brikman; S S Khalsa; M J Davey; N E Brisbon
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Image quality control for digital mammographic systems: initial experience and outlook.

Authors:  H Roehrig; T Yu; E Krupinski
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 5.  Quality control of storage phosphor digital radiography systems.

Authors:  M Freedman; D Steller; H Jafroudi; S K Mun
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Picture archiving communication systems in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  D M Tucker; G T Barnes; R E Koehler
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  A test pattern for quality control of laser scanner and charge-coupled device film digitizers.

Authors:  E J Halpern
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Interfacing aspects between the picture archiving communications systems, radiology information systems, and hospital information systems.

Authors:  C M Breant; R K Taira; H K Huang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 9.  Bedside chest radiography.

Authors:  J C Wandtke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Initial experience with a radiology imaging network to newborn and intensive care units.

Authors:  R M Witt; M D Cohen; C R Appledorn
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.056

View more
  2 in total

1.  Frequency and impact of high-resolution monitor failure in a filmless imaging department.

Authors:  E L Siegel; B I Reiner; M Cadogan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Digital repeat analysis; setup and operation.

Authors:  J Nol; G Isouard; J Mirecki
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.056

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.