Literature DB >> 2644773

Detection of pneumothorax: comparison of digital and conventional chest imaging.

L L Fajardo1, B J Hillman, G D Pond, R F Carmody, J E Johnson, W R Ferrell.   

Abstract

To investigate radiologists' performance at interpreting digital radiographic images, we compared the detectability of pneumothoraces on computed radiographic chest images with 0.2-mm pixel size (2.5 Ip/mm) with their detectability on matched conventional screen-film images (5 Ip/mm). Eight radiologists reviewed 50 computed and 50 screen-film chest radiographs from 25 patients with pneumothoraces and 25 patients with other (or no) abnormalities. Four of the readers who best detected pneumothoraces on screen-film examinations performed worse when interpreting computed radiographic studies; the other four readers detected pneumothoraces similarly with both techniques. No relationship was found between the size of a pneumothorax and its likelihood of detection by either technique. These results raise concerns about implementing computed radiography for comprehensive chest imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2644773     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.152.3.475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  11 in total

Review 1.  Literature review: picture archiving and communication system.

Authors:  U P Schmiedl; A H Rowberg
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 2.  Chest imaging within the radiology department by means of photostimulable phosphor computed radiography: a review.

Authors:  H Blume; R G Jost
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Should 3K zoom function be used for detection of pneumothorax in cesium iodide/amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiographs presented on 1K-matrix soft copies?

Authors:  Karin A Herrmann; H M Bonél; A Stäbler; M Voelk; M Strotzer; C J Zech; M F Reiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  An ROC study of chest radiographs: 2K Versus 4K high-resolution soft-copy images.

Authors:  Su Young Kim; Yoon Joon Hwang; Yoon Hee Han; Jung Wook Seo; Ji Young Lee; Yong Hoon Kim; Soon Joo Cha; Gham Hur; Sung Soon Lee
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Unsharp masking of low-dosed digital luminescence radiographs: results of a receiver operating characteristics analysis.

Authors:  R D Müller; M Voss; H Hirche; B Buddenbrock; V John; E Bosch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Computed radiography in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units: a comparison of 2.5 K x 2 K soft-copy images vs digital hard-copy film.

Authors:  P W Brill; P Winchester; P Cahill; M Lesser; S M Durfee; C S Giess; P A Auld; B Greenwald
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1996

7.  Clinical assessment of phosphor-plate computed radiography: equipment, strategy, and methods.

Authors:  B J Hillman; L L Fajardo
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  A test pattern for quality control of laser scanner and charge-coupled device film digitizers.

Authors:  E J Halpern
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Subjective and objective assessment of image quality--a comparison.

Authors:  W F Good; D Gur; J H Feist; F L Thaete; C R Fuhrman; C A Britton; B S Slasky
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Report on a new type of trauma full-body digital X-ray machine.

Authors:  S Beningfield; H Potgieter; A Nicol; S van As; G Bowie; E Hering; E Lätti
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2003-04-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.