Literature DB >> 32522551

A behavioral method to estimate charge integration efficiency in cochlear implant users.

Ning Zhou1, Lixue Dong1, John J Galvin2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In cochlear implants, pulse amplitude (PA) or pulse phase duration (PPD) can be used to increase loudness. Loudness grows more slowly with increasing PPD, resulting in a larger dynamic range (DR), possibly reflecting "leaky" charge integration associated with neural degeneration due to hearing loss. Here, we propose a method to estimate charge integration efficiency for CI users. NEW
METHOD: The DR was measured with increasing PA or PPD, relative to a common threshold anchor with a short PPD (25μs/ph); DRs were converted to the common unit of charge (nC). Charge integration efficiency was calculated as the dB difference in DR with increasing PPD or PA. Loudness growth functions were also compared as PA or PPD was increased relative to the common threshold.
RESULTS: Ten CI ears were tested; all participants were adult users of Cochlear© devices. DR was significantly larger when PPD was increased, requiring (on average) 70 % more charge than when PA was increased. A significant correlation (p = 0.007) was observed between duration of deafness and charge integration efficiency, largely driven by a participant with long auditory deprivation in both ears. Loudness growth was slower when PPD was increased, consistent with previous studies. Comparison to Existing Methods. The present method offers a quick behavioral test with which to measure charge integration efficiency, which may be a useful measure of neural health. DISCUSSION: Charge integration efficiency may be used to probe neural health independent of absolute detection thresholds, which mostly reflect the proximity of electrodes to neural populations.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Charge integration; Cochlear implant; Dynamic range; Loudness growth; Pulse phase duration

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32522551      PMCID: PMC7377816          DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  15 in total

1.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Effect of stimulus waveshape on single fibre response properties.

Authors:  R K Shepherd; E Javel
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: single neuron strength-duration functions in deafened animals.

Authors:  R K Shepherd; N A Hardie; J H Baxi
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Encoding loudness by electric stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  F G Zeng; J J Galvin; C Zhang
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1998-06-01       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  Effects of electrode configuration on psychophysical strength-duration functions for single biphasic electrical stimuli in cats.

Authors:  D W Smith; C C Finley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Sensitivity to pulse phase duration in cochlear implant listeners: effects of stimulation mode.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Aditya M Kulkarni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Auditory-nerve responses to varied inter-phase gap and phase duration of the electric pulse stimulus as predictors for neuronal degeneration.

Authors:  Dyan Ramekers; Huib Versnel; Stefan B Strahl; Emma M Smeets; Sjaak F L Klis; Wilko Grolman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-28

7.  Effect of interphase gap and pulse duration on electrically evoked potentials is correlated with auditory nerve survival.

Authors:  Pavel Prado-Guitierrez; Leonie M Fewster; John M Heasman; Colette M McKay; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Threshold and loudness functions for pulsatile stimulation of cochlear implants.

Authors:  R V Shannon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Sensorineural hearing loss during development: morphological and physiological response of the cochlea and auditory brainstem.

Authors:  N A Hardie; R K Shepherd
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  The Effect of Interphase Gap on Neural Response of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency and Children With Normal-Sized Cochlear Nerves.

Authors:  Shuman He; Lei Xu; Jeffrey Skidmore; Xiuhua Chao; Fuh-Cherng Jeng; Ruijie Wang; Jianfen Luo; Haibo Wang
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effect of pulse phase duration on forward masking and spread of excitation in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Zhen Zhu; Lixue Dong; John J Galvin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Sensitivity to Pulse Phase Duration as a Marker of Neural Health Across Cochlear Implant Recipients and Electrodes.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Zhen Zhu; Lixue Dong; John Galvin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-02-08

3.  Management of Severe Facial Nerve Cross Stimulation by Cochlear Implant Replacement to Change Pulse Shape and Grounding Configuration: A Case-series.

Authors:  Susan T Eitutis; Robert P Carlyon; Yu Chuen Tam; Marina Salorio-Corbetto; Zebunnisa Vanat; Karen Tebbutt; Rhian Bardsley; Harry R F Powell; Shibasis Chowdhury; James R Tysome; Manohar L Bance
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.311

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.