Literature DB >> 16103644

Psychophysical metrics and speech recognition in cochlear implant users.

Bryan E Pfingst1, Li Xu.   

Abstract

Intersubject variability in perception is a prominent characteristic of people with cochlear implants. This study characterized intersubject differences using simple metrics based on psychophysical measures: maximum comfortable loudness levels (C levels) and dynamic ranges (DRs). In a group of 17 subjects, we assessed across-site variation (ASV) and across-site mean (ASM) values of C levels and DRs for bipolar (BP) and monopolar (MP) stimulation, and examined the relation of these metrics to speech recognition across subjects. Significant negative correlations with speech recognition were found for ASVs of C levels for BP stimulation; i.e., subjects with high ASVs of BP C levels had poor speech recognition. Positive correlations with speech recognition were found for ASMs of C levels and ASMs of DRs for both BP and MP stimulation; i.e., subjects with high mean C levels and large mean DRs had better speech recognition. Thus, these psychophysical metrics are effective for diagnosis of individual differences in performance of subjects with cochlear implants. Furthermore, they point to some potentially useful treatment procedures. Copyright (c) 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16103644      PMCID: PMC1472183          DOI: 10.1159/000087350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiol Neurootol        ISSN: 1420-3030            Impact factor:   1.854


  30 in total

1.  Cognitive factors and cochlear implants: some thoughts on perception, learning, and memory in speech perception.

Authors:  D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Place-pitch sensitivity and its relation to consonant recognition by cochlear implant listeners using the MPEAK and SPEAK speech processing strategies.

Authors:  G S Donaldson; D A Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Consonant recordings for speech testing.

Authors:  R V Shannon; A Jensvold; M Padilla; M E Robert; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.

Authors:  L M Friesen; R V Shannon; D Baskent; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of stimulus level on speech perception with cochlear prostheses.

Authors:  Kevin H Franck; Li Xu; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2002-07-16

6.  Holes in hearing.

Authors:  Robert V Shannon; John J Galvin; Deniz Baskent
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2002-06

7.  Electrode configuration influences action potential initiation site and ensemble stochastic response properties.

Authors:  Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas; Kirill V Nourski; Ning Hu; Barbara K Robinson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Electrode discrimination and speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects.

Authors:  T A Zwolan; L M Collins; G H Wakefield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Intracochlear factors contributing to psychophysical percepts following cochlear implantation.

Authors:  A Kawano; H L Seldon; G M Clark; R T Ramsden; C H Raine
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.494

10.  High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  C A Hogan; C W Turner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  10 in total

1.  Across-site patterns of modulation detection in listeners with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Rose A Burkholder-Juhasz; Li Xu; Catherine S Thompson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Psychophysical assessment of stimulation sites in auditory prosthesis electrode arrays.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Rose A Burkholder-Juhasz; Teresa A Zwolan; Li Xu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Psychophysically based site selection coupled with dichotic stimulation improves speech recognition in noise with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of electrode configuration on cochlear implant modulation detection thresholds.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Longitudinal effect of deactivating stimulation sites based on low-rate thresholds on speech recognition in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ning Zhou
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  CCi-MOBILE: A Portable Real Time Speech Processing Platform for Cochlear Implant and Hearing Research.

Authors:  Ria Ghosh; Hussnain Ali; John H L Hansen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Relationship between multipulse integration and speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effects of site-specific level adjustments on speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  The Estimated Electrode-Neuron Interface in Cochlear Implant Listeners Is Different for Early-Implanted Children and Late-Implanted Adults.

Authors:  Mishaela DiNino; Gabrielle O'Brien; Steven M Bierer; Kelly N Jahn; Julie G Arenberg
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-03-25

10.  The Relationship Between Impedance, Programming and Word Recognition in a Large Clinical Dataset of Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Benjamin Caswell-Midwinter; Elizabeth M Doney; Meisam K Arjmandi; Kelly N Jahn; Barbara S Herrmann; Julie G Arenberg
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.