Literature DB >> 11427697

Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

L Robles1, M A Ruggero.   

Abstract

In mammals, environmental sounds stimulate the auditory receptor, the cochlea, via vibrations of the stapes, the innermost of the middle ear ossicles. These vibrations produce displacement waves that travel on the elongated and spirally wound basilar membrane (BM). As they travel, waves grow in amplitude, reaching a maximum and then dying out. The location of maximum BM motion is a function of stimulus frequency, with high-frequency waves being localized to the "base" of the cochlea (near the stapes) and low-frequency waves approaching the "apex" of the cochlea. Thus each cochlear site has a characteristic frequency (CF), to which it responds maximally. BM vibrations produce motion of hair cell stereocilia, which gates stereociliar transduction channels leading to the generation of hair cell receptor potentials and the excitation of afferent auditory nerve fibers. At the base of the cochlea, BM motion exhibits a CF-specific and level-dependent compressive nonlinearity such that responses to low-level, near-CF stimuli are sensitive and sharply frequency-tuned and responses to intense stimuli are insensitive and poorly tuned. The high sensitivity and sharp-frequency tuning, as well as compression and other nonlinearities (two-tone suppression and intermodulation distortion), are highly labile, indicating the presence in normal cochleae of a positive feedback from the organ of Corti, the "cochlear amplifier." This mechanism involves forces generated by the outer hair cells and controlled, directly or indirectly, by their transduction currents. At the apex of the cochlea, nonlinearities appear to be less prominent than at the base, perhaps implying that the cochlear amplifier plays a lesser role in determining apical mechanical responses to sound. Whether at the base or the apex, the properties of BM vibration adequately account for most frequency-specific properties of the responses to sound of auditory nerve fibers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11427697      PMCID: PMC3590856          DOI: 10.1152/physrev.2001.81.3.1305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Rev        ISSN: 0031-9333            Impact factor:   37.312


  325 in total

1.  Somatic stiffness of cochlear outer hair cells is voltage-dependent.

Authors:  D Z He; P Dallos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Three-dimensional motion of the organ of Corti.

Authors:  W Hemmert; H P Zenner; A W Gummer
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Current status of theories of hearing.

Authors:  G VON BEKESY
Journal:  Science       Date:  1956-05-04       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Shapes of rate-versus-level functions of primary auditory nerve fibres: test of the basilar membrane mechanical hypothesis.

Authors:  M Müller; D Robertson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  A cytoskeletal spring in cochlear outer hair cells.

Authors:  M C Holley; J F Ashmore
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-10-13       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Basilar membrane motion.

Authors:  G Zweig
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1976

7.  Basilar membrane tuning in the cat cochlea.

Authors:  S M Khanna; D G Leonard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-01-15       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Basilar membrane tuning curves in the guinea pig.

Authors:  B M Johnstone; G K Yates
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Responses of auditory-nerve fibers to characteristic-frequency tones and low-frequency suppressors.

Authors:  M B Sachs; A E Hubbard
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  The cochlear place-frequency map of the adult and developing Mongolian gerbil.

Authors:  M Müller
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  435 in total

1.  Separate mechanical processes underlie fast and slow effects of medial olivocochlear efferent activity.

Authors:  N P Cooper; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-02-28       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Longitudinal pattern of basilar membrane vibration in the sensitive cochlea.

Authors:  Tianying Ren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Individual differences in behavioral estimates of cochlear nonlinearities.

Authors:  Gayla L Poling; Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-09-22

4.  Measuring hearing organ vibration patterns with confocal microscopy and optical flow.

Authors:  Anders Fridberger; Jerker Widengren; Jacques Boutet de Monvel
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Organ of Corti kinematics.

Authors:  Peter Dallos
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-09

6.  Synchronization of a nonlinear oscillator: processing the cf component of the echo-response signal in the cochlea of the mustached bat.

Authors:  Ian J Russell; Markus Drexl; Elisabeth Foeller; Marianne Vater; Manfred Kössl
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-22       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Towards a joint reflection-distortion otoacoustic emission profile: Results in normal and impaired ears.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Radha Kalluri
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Motion generation by Drosophila mechanosensory neurons.

Authors:  M C Göpfert; D Robert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-03-17       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Tinnitus and patterns of hearing loss.

Authors:  Christine M Tan; Wendy Lecluyse; Don McFerran; Ray Meddis
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-01-18

10.  Relationship Between Behavioral and Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Delay-Based Tuning Estimates.

Authors:  Uzma Shaheen Wilson; Jenna Browning-Kamins; Sriram Boothalingam; Arturo Moleti; Renata Sisto; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.