Literature DB >> 14564662

Cortical responses to cochlear implant stimulation: channel interactions.

Julie Arenberg Bierer1, John C Middlebrooks.   

Abstract

This study examined the interactions between electrical stimuli presented through two channels of a cochlear implant. Experiments were conducted in anesthetized guinea pigs. Multiunit spike activity recorded from the auditory cortex reflected the cumulative effects of electric field interactions in the cochlea as well as any neural interactions along the ascending auditory pathway. The cochlea was stimulated electrically through a 6-electrode intracochlear array. The stimulus on each channel was a single 80- micro s/phase biphasic pulse. Channel interactions were quantified as changes in the thresholds for elevation of cortical spike rates. Experimental parameters were interchannel temporal offset (0 to +/-2000 micro s), interelectrode cochlear spacing (1.5 or 2.25 mm), electrode configuration (monopolar, bipolar, or tripolar), and relative polarity between channels (same or inverted). In most conditions, presentation of a subthreshold pulse on one channel reduced the threshold for a pulse on a second channel. Threshold shifts were greatest for simultaneous pulses, but appreciable threshold reductions could persist for temporal offsets up to 640 micro s. Channel interactions varied strongly with electrode configuration: threshold shifts increased in magnitude in the order tripolar, bipolar, monopolar. Channel interactions were greater for closer electrode spacing. The results have implications for design of speech processors for cochlear implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14564662      PMCID: PMC2538368          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-003-3057-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  37 in total

1.  Evaluation of a model of the cochlear neural membrane. I. Physiological measurement of membrane characteristics in response to intrameatal electrical stimulation.

Authors:  L A Cartee; C van den Honert; C C Finley; R L Miller
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.

Authors:  L M Friesen; R V Shannon; D Baskent; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Loudness summation for pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea: effects of rate, electrode separation, level, and mode of stimulation.

Authors:  C M McKay; M D Remine; H J McDermott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory cortical images of tones and noise bands.

Authors:  J G Arenberg; S Furukawa; J C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2000-09

5.  Coding of sound-source location by ensembles of cortical neurons.

Authors:  S Furukawa; L Xu; J C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 Channel Cochlear Implant System.

Authors:  M W Skinner; G M Clark; L A Whitford; P M Seligman; S J Staller; D B Shipp; J K Shallop; C Everingham; C M Menapace; P L Arndt
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1994-11

7.  Effects of electrical current configuration on potential fields in the electrically stimulated cochlea: field models and measurements.

Authors:  F A Spelman; B E Pfingst; B M Clopton; C N Jolly; K L Rodenhiser
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1995-09

8.  Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: coding of stimulus channel and current level.

Authors:  John C Middlebrooks; Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Relation between the growth of loudness and high-frequency excitation.

Authors:  R P Hellman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  23 in total

1.  Effects of stimulation mode, level and location on forward-masked excitation patterns in cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Robert V Shannon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-11-04

Review 2.  Phosphene induction by microstimulation of macaque V1.

Authors:  Edward J Tehovnik; Warren M Slocum
Journal:  Brain Res Rev       Date:  2006-12-14

3.  Loudness adaptation in acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Qing Tang; Sheng Liu; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-01-20

4.  Spatial and temporal effects of interleaved masking in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Bom Jun Kwon; Chris van den Honert
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-06-03

5.  Current focusing and steering: modeling, physiology, and psychophysics.

Authors:  Ben H Bonham; Leonid M Litvak
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-04-06       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Cochlear-implant high pulse rate and narrow electrode configuration impair transmission of temporal information to the auditory cortex.

Authors:  John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Current steering with partial tripolar stimulation mode in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ching-Chih Wu; Xin Luo
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-12-19

8.  Electrode spanning with partial tripolar stimulation mode in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ching-Chih Wu; Xin Luo
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-05-28

9.  Psychophysical and physiological measures of electrical-field interaction in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Lisa J Stille
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 10.  Trends in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.