| Literature DB >> 35883760 |
Ivana Krajina1,2, Ana Stupin3,4, Marija Šola1,2, Martina Mihalj1,3,4.
Abstract
Although oxidative stress is recognized as an important effector mechanism of the immune system, uncontrolled formation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species promotes excessive tissue damage and leads to disease development. In view of this, increased dietary salt intake has been found to damage redox systems in the vessel wall, resulting in endothelial dysfunction associated with NO uncoupling, inflammation, vascular wall remodeling and, eventually, atherosclerosis. Several studies have reported increased systemic oxidative stress accompanied by reduced antioxidant capacity following a high salt diet. In addition, vigorous ionic effects on the immune mechanisms, such as (trans)differentiation of T lymphocytes are emerging, which together with the evidence of NaCl accumulation in certain tissues warrants a re-examination of the data derived from in vitro research, in which the ionic influence was excluded. Psoriasis vulgaris (PV), as a primarily Th17-driven inflammatory skin disease with proven inflammation-induced accumulation of sodium chloride in the skin, merits our interest in the role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of PV, as well as in the possible beneficial effects that could be achieved through modulation of dietary salt intake and antioxidant supplementation.Entities:
Keywords: T helper 17 cells; biological drugs; endothelium; oxidative stress; psoriasis; sodium chloride; vascular
Year: 2022 PMID: 35883760 PMCID: PMC9311978 DOI: 10.3390/antiox11071269
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
Figure 1Immunopathogenesis of chronic plaque psoriasis.
Figure 2Regulation of skin NaCl storage. Serum NaCl (red dots) concentration is maintained within a narrow range (135–145 mm/L) with varying dietary intake and in different pathological conditions; however, recent data suggests that the skin NaCl content changes significantly in response to dietary load and inflammation. Increased GAG polymerization (a) enables Na+ storage, while neo(lympho)angiogenesis allows NaCl clearance in the skin induced by VEGF-C stimuli (b). Skin is an important lymphoid compartment characterized by immune surveillance cells. Increased Na+ content affects Tem reactivation (c) in the skin, as well as naïve Th lymphocytes differentiation in the regional lymph nodes (d).
Figure 3Dichotomous pathogen-specific Th17 responses under hypersaline tissue microenvironment depend on differential priming requirements for IL-1β.
Figure 4Pathogenesis of endothelial dysfunction in psoriasis patients is related to inflammation and oxidative stress. In response to the hypersaline microenvironment, keratinocytes and lymphocytes (a) secret pro-inflammatory cytokines (i.e., interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, TNFα) and chemokines, leading to endothelial activation characterized by the cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) upregulation (b). In response to the chemokines and interactions with CAMs, peripheral leukocytes transmigrate trough the vessel wall to the sites of inflammation (c). Neutrophils are predominant cell type in leukocyte infiltrate of the psoriatic skin, responsible for generation of reactive oxygen (ROS) and nitrogen (RNS) species (d). An additional mechanism of oxidative stress during increased dietary salt intake involves RAS suppression and eNOS uncoupling (e). LL37, cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide LL37; HBD, human beta defensin; S100, calcium-binding protein S100; IL, interleukin; ROS, reactive oxygen species; RNS, reactive nitrogen species; MMP-9, matrix metalloproteinase 9; self-DNA, self-deoxyribonucleic acid; self-RNA, self-ribonucleic acid; IFN-γ, interferon γ; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor α; pDC, plasmacytoid dendritic cell; Th17, T helper 17 cells; Th1, T helper 1 cells; sLex, Sialyl Lewis X; CXCL1, C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 1; CCL3, C-C motif chemokine ligand 3; COX, cyclooxygenase; mr-200c, microRNA-200c; endocan, endothelial cell specific molecule-1; ICAM-1, intercellular adhesion molecule 1; VCAM-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1; AChR, acetylcholine receptor; eNOS, endothelial nitric oxide synthase; NO, nitric oxide; BH4, tetrahydrobiopterin; ONOO, peroxynitrite; H2O2, hydrogen peroxide; O2−, superoxide; OH, hydroxide; HClO, hypochlorous acid.
Endothelial dysfunction in psoriasis and evidence of oxidative stress and inflammation.
| First | Country | Study Design | Study Groups | Psoriasis Severity/PASI Inclusion Criteria | PASI Mean ± SD/[SEM] or Median (IQR) | Disease Duration (Years, Mean ± SD or [SEM]) | Systemic | Assessment Method/ | Vessel, Measurement Site | Measurements | Effect on Measured Inflammation and Oxidative Stress Parameters | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psoriasis | Controls | |||||||||||
| Denmark | Case-control Study | 30 | 30 | Mild to moderate psoriasis/PASI < 10 | 7.3 ± 3.8 | 21.3 ± 17.0 | None | PAT (reactive hyperemia index, RHI; augmentation index, %)/Brachial artery (occlusion) | both index fingers | ↔ RHI; ↔ AI% | ↑ hsCRP ( | |
| Sweden | Case-control Study | 20 | 20 | Severe psoriasis/PASI > 12 | 14.3 ± 4.8 | 0.4 ± 0.3 | None | FMD, NMD (absolute value vessel dilatation (B2-B1); vessel dilatation as the % of baseline value, %)/Forearm cuff (occlusion) | BA, above the elbow | ↔ B2-B1 | ↑ hsCRP ( | |
| United Kingdom | Prospective Cohort Study | 60 | 117 | Moderate to severe psoriasis/PASI > 10 | 9.15 ± [0.91] | 31 ± [1.6] | Standard systemic therapy: MTX ( | FMD, NMD (vessel dilatation as the % of baseline value, %)/Forearm cuff (occlusion) | BA, above the elbow | ↔ %FMD | ↑ hsCRP ( | |
| Italy | Case-control Study | 39 | 38 | Moderate to severe psoriasis/PASI > 10 | 12.4 ± 4.7 | 14.8 ± 12.7 | None (at least 2 months before inclusion) | cfPWV; no occlusion site | cfPWV—sensor on CA and FA; | ↑ cfPWV ( | ↔ CRP | |
| Turkey | Case-control Study | 43 | 43 | All PASI included | 6.5 ± 4.4 | 13.26 ± 10.55 | None ( | cIMT (mm), no occlusion site | cIMT—left and right CCA | ↑ cIMT ( | / | |
| Turkey | Case-control Study | 28 | 28 | Mild to moderate/PASI 0.1–49.9 | 13 ± 8 | 4 ± 3 | None | FMD, NMD (vessel dilatation as the % of baseline value, %)/3–4 cm proximal to the section of the brachial artery (occlusion) | BA, above the elbow | ↓ FMD% ( | / | |
| Germany | Randomized Controlled Trial | 151 | 44 | Moderate to severe/PASI > 10 | A. 19.3 ± 7.9 | A. 20.6 ± 12.7 | A. secukinumab 300 mg from baseline to week 52 ( | FMD (vessel dilatation as the % of baseline value, %)/5 cm distal to the measurement site (occlusion) | FMD—BA, 5–10 cm proximal to the antecubital fossa | Psoriasis patients compared to healthy controls: ↓ FMD% (at baseline), ( | A compared with C + D at week 12: | |
| Italy | Case-control Study | 32 | 31 | Not specified/all PASI included | 17.9 ± 10.9 | 12.6 ± 10.2 | None (at least 3 months prior) | FMD, NMD (vessel dilatation as the % of baseline value, %)/forearm (occlusion) | Right BA, 2 to 15 cm proximal to the antecubital fossa | ↓ FMD% ( | ↔ CRP | |
| Turkey | Case-control Study | 60 | 30 | Moderate to severe/PASI ≥ 5 | Pso-ED | Pso-ED 7.8 (1–30) | none | FMD, NMD (vessel dilatation as the % of baseline value, %)/not specified (occlusion) | BA | ↓ FMD ( | ↑ YKL-40 ( | |
| Poland | Case-control Study | 80 | 39 | Mild to moderate | 18.6 ± 10.5 | 15.3 ± 11.2 | none | cfPWV (m/s), no occlusion site, | cfPWV—sensors (CCA and CFA) | ↑ cIMT(mm) ( | ↑ AOPPs ( | |
| Austria | Randomized Controlled Trial | 65 | Moderate to severe/PASI ≥ 10 | Adalimumab group: 16.3 ± 5.8 | Adalimumab group: 11.9 ± 11.3 | Intervention with: | FMD, NMD (vessel dilatation as the % of baseline value, %)/not specified (occlusion) | FMD—BA, above the antecubital fossa | Adalimumab group: ↑ FMD% after intervention ( | Adalimumab a.i.:↓hsCRP ( | ||
| Turkey | Case-control Study | 56 | 53 | Mild to moderate/PASI 0.1–49.9 | 3 (range 0.6–27) | 5.5 (range 0.5–50) | None (at least 3 months prior) | FMD (vessel dilatation as the % of baseline value, %)/forearm, bottom of the cuff on the wrist (occlusion) | FMD—BA, 2–5 cm proximal to the antecubital fossa | ↓ FMD % ( | ↑ sCD40L ( | |
| Turkey | Case-control Study | 75 (24 + PsA) | 50 | All PASI included | 4.4 (1.8–34) | No data provided | No data obtained | FMD (vessel dilatation as the % of baseline value, %)/proximal forearm (occlusion) | BA | Pso vs. controls: | ↑ ESR ( | |
| Poland | Case-control Study | 62 (6 + PsA) | 42 | All PASI included | 14.92 ± 6.99 | Assessed, data not provided | Data obtained on past use of systemic therapy (systemic treatment was used in | cIMT (mm), no occlusion site | cIMT—Both CCA, 2 cm from their bifurcation | ↑ cIMT ( | ↑ CRP ( | |
| Poland | Cross-sectional Study | 74 | none | Mild to moderate/PASI ≤ 50 | 18.7 ± 10.6 | 17.1 ± 11.2 | Biologics ( | cIMT (mm), no occlusion site | Both CCA, distal segments | Association between cIMT and PASI (r = 0.33; | / | |
| Germany | Cross-sectional Study | 72 | 1955 | No data | No data | No data | No data provided | cIMT (mm), no occlusion site | Both CCA (10 consecutive measurement points, in 1 mm steps, from the bulb of both sides) | ↑ cIMT ( | ↑ hsCRP ( | |
| Brazil | Case-control Study | 11 | 33 | Severe/PASI > 10 | No data | No data | MTX ( | PWV (m/s), AIx, arm (occlusion) | PWV—not specified | ↑ PWV ( | ↑ CRP ( | |
| Italy | Case-control Study | 20 | 20 | Not specified | 2.64 ± 2.6 | 1.84 ± 1.18 | Cyclosporine ( | cIMT(mm), no occlusion site | Both CCA, at least 5 mm below its end | ↑ cIMT (right, | / | |
| Egypt | Case-control Study | 45 | 45 | Not specified/all PASI included | 10.18 ± 4.6 | cIMT < 1 mm: | none | cIMT(mm), no occlusion site | Both CCA, distal portion of the CCA (10–20 mm proximal to the carotid bulb) | ↑ cIMT ( | ↑ psoriasin ( | |
| China | Case-control Study | 35 | 20 | BSA > 10% | 15.5 ± 12.7 | 14.0 ± 7.2 | MTX ( | haPWV (m/s), no occlusion site, | haPWV—precordium and both posterior PA | CD34 + EPC was independently predictive of increased haPWV | ↓ CD34 + EPC ( | |
| Egypt | Case-control Study | 80 | 50 | Not specified/all PASI included | 29.1 ± 16 | 12.6 ± 9.5 | No data provided (patients treated with cyclosporine or retinoid were excluded) | cIMT(mm), no occlusion site | right CCA, 1 cm distal to the carotid bifurcation in the posterior wall | ↑ cIMT ( | ↑ CRP ( | |
| Spain | Prospective Cohort Study | 53 | Self-controlled, 8 m | PASI ≥ 5 | 9.46 ± 3.62 | 17.33 ± 10.78 | Systemic therapy ( | cIMT (mm), no occlusion site | cIMT—left CCA, 1 cm from the carotid bifurcation (6 measurements) | All patients: | / | |
| Hungary | Prospective Cohort Study | 31 (17 + PsA) | Self-controlled, 6 m | Severe psoriasis/PASI > 10 | 18 (14–24) | 24 (16–28) | anti-IL-17 therapy- intervention: | cIMT (mm) | cIMT—CCA; | 6 months after baseline, a.i. | / | |
| Hungary | Prospective Cohort Study | 16 | Self-controlled, 6 m | Severe psoriasis/PASI > 15 | Baseline: 25.64 (21.2–32.4); | 16.8 (4–40) | No biologic therapy at baseline; intervention with TNF-α inhibitors: etanercept ( | cIMT (mm), bIMT (mm), no occlusion site | cIMT—carotid bifurcation | Group 1— no apparent atherosclerosis ( | / | |
| Greece | Case-control Study | 59 | 59 CAD patients; 40 healthy controls | All PASI included | 11.5 ± 8 | 5.1 ± 1.25 | Ciclosporine ( | cfPWV (m/s), augmentation index (CAI, %), no occlusion site, | cfPWV—sensors (CCA and CFA | Compared to healthy controls: | Compared to healthy controls: | |
| Iran | Case-control Study | 60 | 60 | All PASI included | 23.45 (14.92–33.18) | 10 (4–16.5) | None (exclusion criteria was systemic therapy within the last 6 months) | cIMT (mm), no occlusion site | Right CCA, 1 cm proximal to the bifurcation (at least 3 measurements) | ↑ cIMT ( | ↑ leptin, ↑ resistin ( | |
| Italy | Case-control Study | 40 | 40 | Moderate to severe/PASI > 10 | 16.1 ± ? | Not assessed | Exclusion criteria were: cyclosporine, oral retinoids, systemic steroids; no other data on therapy available | cIMT (mm), no occlusion site | cIMT—CCA, 1 cm proximal to the bifurcation | ↑ IMT ( | / | |
| Slovenia | Prospective Cohort Study | 15 | Self-controlled | Moderate to severe/PASI > 10 | PASI | 20.9 (range 3–52) | Intervention with anti-IL-23/IL-17: ustekinumab ( | cfPWV (m/s), no occlusion site, | CfPWV—CA, FA | ↔ cfPWV | / | |
| Egypt | Case-control Study | 60 | 20 | Mild, moderate, severe/all PASI included | 18.49 ± 11.29 | 11.25 ± 6.95 | None (at least 6 weeks prior to cIMT) | cIMT (mm; internal diameter—ID; arterial wall mass index—AWMI), no occlusion site | Both sides at three points: | ↑ cIMT ( | / | |
| China | Case-control Study | 52 | 50 | BSA > 10 | 14.7 ± 12.1 | 15.4 ± 7.1 | Methotrexate ( | baPWV (m/s), no occlusion, | baPWV—ATP and BA; | Psoriasis vs. controls: | ↑ hsCRP ( | |
| South Korea | Case-control Study | 54 | 60 | Mild and moderate to severe/all PASI included | 10.7 + 7.0 | 10.4 + 9.7 | Data on previous systemic treatment obtained: | BSI (β) | BSI—region 2 cm from the carotid bifurcation toward the center of the body | ↑ BSI ( | / | |
| Germany | Case-control Study | 30 | 26 | Not specified | 10.2 ± 2.0 | 18.3 ± 2.7 | Past/present treatment with biological drug ( | cfPWV (m/s), augmentation index, AI; no occlusion site | Sensors on CA and FA | ↔ PWV (m/s) | ↑CRP | |
| Spain | Prospective Cohort Study | 29 | Self-controlled | Moderate to severe psoriasis | 18.9 ± 7.8 | 18.2 ± 12.1 | Anti-TNF-α (intervention): | FMD (vessel dilatation as the % of baseline value, %), forearm (occlusion); | FMD—BA, 2–12 cm proximal to the antecubital fossa | A.i. vs. baseline: | hsCRP? | |
| Turkey | Case-control Study | 32 | 35 | All PASI included | Assessed, but values not presented in paper | Assessed, but values not presented in paper | No data provided | PWV (m/s), augmentation index (AIx), BA (occlusion) | Distance between jugular notch and symphysis pubis | ↑ PWV (m/s), ( | ↑ hsCRP ( | |
| United Kingdom | Cross-sectional Study | 2091 | 165 149 | Presence of psoriasis diagnosis/all included | Not assessed | Not assessed | Corticosteroids ( | photoplethysmography (arterial stiffness index, SI, m/s), no occlusion | Index finger of the dominant hand | ↑ SI ( | / | |
| South Korea | Case-control Study | 103 | 103 | All PASI included | 8.7 + 5.5 | 3 (0.5–10) | No data provided | CAVI, right brachial, right ankle (occlusion) | PWV—between aortic valve and ankle | ↑ CAVI ( | ↑ CRP ( | |
| Denmark | Cross-sectional Study | 254 | 4431 | Self-reported psoriasis/all included | Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | photoplethysmography (arterial stiffness index, SI), no occlusion | Index finger of the non-dominant hand | ↑ SI ( | ↑ hsCRP | |
| Denmark | Randomized Controlled Trial | 30 Pso, low energy diet | 30 Pso, normal diet | All PASI included | 4.8 (3.8–8.2) intervention group; | Not assessed | Not assessed | PAT (reactive hyperemia index, RHI)/Brachial artery (occlusion on the upper arm) | Both index fingers | ↔ RHI | ↔ hsCRP | |
| Japan | Cohort Study | 15 (7 + PsA) | Self-controlled | Not specified | 5.7 (3.2–12.8) | Mean 18.7 | Intervention with anti TNF-α: infliximab | RH-PAT (RHI), arm opposite to the dominant arm (occlusion) | Fingers of each hand | 6 weeks: | ↓ CRP, ↓ ESR ( | |
| Turkey | Case-control Study | 50 | 50 | Not specified | 13.7 ± 8.9 | 13.5 ± 10.7 | No data (data obtained about previous medication) | PWV(m/s), AIx | ↑ PWV ( | ↑ NLR ( | ||
| Turkey | Case-control Study | 57 | 60 | Not specified/all PASI included | 7.8 ± 7.4 | 11.3 ± 8.5 | None (no systemic immunosuppressive therapy at least 6 months prior) | cfPWV(m/s), | cfPWV—CA, FA | ↑ cfPWV ( | / | |
| Egypt | Case-control Study | 50 | 10 | All PASI included | 20.99 ± 16.67 | 6.50 ± 2.95 | None (at least 6 months prior) | cIMT(mm), no occlusion site | CCA, 1 cm proximal to the carotid bulb; | ↑ cIMT ( | ↑ leptin ( | |
| Italy | Case-control Study | ↓ CV R 34; ↑ CVR 23 | ↓ CVR 39; ↑ CVR15 | Severe/PASI not specified | No data provided | No data provided | No data provided | PWV (m/s) | Not specified | Low CV risk, Pso vs. controls: | / | |
| India | Case-control Study | 80 | 80 | Not specified/all PASI included | 15.60 ± 10.79 | 3.42 ± 2.56 | No data provided | cIMT(mm), no occlusion site | Both CA | ↑ mean cIMT ( | ↑ leptin ( | |
| Turkey | Case-control Study | 29 | 25 | Not specified/all PASI included | 4.6 ± 3.8 | 13 ± 10 | None (at least 1 month prior) | FMD, NMD (vessel dilatation as the % of baseline value, %), upper arm proximal to the imaged artery segment (occlusion); | BA, 2–4 cm above the antecubital fossa | ↔ FMD | ↑ CRP ( | |
| Spain | Case-control Study | 72 | 61 | Severe/PASI > 10 | mean 19.25 | mean 17.64 | None (at least 2 months prior) | cIMT(mm), no occlusion site | Distal portion of the both CCA, 1 to 2 cm proximal to the carotid bulb | ↑ right cIMT ( | ↑ fibrinogen, ↑ CRP, ↑ ESR, ↑ D-dimer, ↑ homocysteine | |
| USA | Case-control Study | 9 (1+ PsA) | 9 | ≥5% BSA | 16 ± 2 BSA | No data provided | None | LDF (NO-dependent vasodilatation—ΔCVClocal heating and CVCpost-l-NAME | Cutaneous microcirculation, forearm skin | ↓ NO-dependent vasodilation ( | / | |
Legend. PAT—digital peripheral artery tomography; FMD—flow-mediated dilatation; NMD—nitroglycerin-mediated dilatation; cfPWV—carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity; crPWV—carotid-radial pulse wave velocity; cIMT—carotid intima-media thickness; bIMT—brachial intima-media thickness; CFR—coronary flow reserve, by doppler echocardiography; baPWV—brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity; haPWV—heart to ankle pulse wave velocity; PWA—pulse wave analysis; CAVI—Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index; cAIx—central augmentation index; RH-PAT—reactive hyperemia-peripheral arterial tonometry; LDF—Laser Doppler flowmetry; CCA—common carotid artery; FA—femoral artery, BA—brachial artery; CFA—common femoral artery; RA—radial artery; ICA—internal carotid artery; LAD—left anterior descending; CFA—common femoral artery; ATP—posterior tibial artery; FAE—fumaric acid esters; a.i.—after intervention; PsA—psoriatic arthritis; CT—computed tomography; MTX—methotrexate; BSI—beta stiffness index; AI/AIx—augmentation index; ESR—erythrocyte sedimentation rate; ED—endothelial dysfunction; CVR—cardiovascular risk; NLR—neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; PBR—perfused boundary region, a marker of glycocalyx barrier function; PA—popliteal artery; CVC—cutaneous vascular conductance; m- months; β—standard regression coefficient; ↔, no significant difference between groups; ↑, increased; ↓, decreased; *—special remark.