| Literature DB >> 35281403 |
Ehsan Nabovati1,2, Fatemeh Rangraz Jeddi1,2, Faeze Ghaffari2,3, Fakhrosadat Mirhoseini4.
Abstract
One of the most commonly used methods for training is simulation. It is important to examine the effects of simulation training of health information systems on the knowledge, attitude, and skill in trainees. This review provided a summary of relevant literature on how simulation training affects the learning of health information systems and determine the features and functional capabilities of existing simulators. Studies and websites using simulation training to teach health information systems were included. Studies were searched through Medline (via PubMed), Scopus, and ISI Web of Science and websites through Google search by the end of 2019. The characteristics of studies, features, and functional capabilities of simulators and effects on learning outcomes were extracted. The included studies and websites were categorized according to different characteristics including simulation types, learning outcome categories, and the effects of simulation training on learning outcomes. The learning outcomes were categorized into four groups: knowledge, attitude, skill, and satisfaction. The effects of interventions on outcomes were categorized into statistically significant positive, positive without statistical argument, no effect (not statistically significant), negative without statistical argument, or statistically significant negative. Ten studies and eight websites that used simulation training to teach health information systems (mainly electronic health record [EHR]) were included. EHR simulation was performed in 80% of the included studies and trainees in 70% of studies were physicians and nurses. All studies were conducted in three developed countries. In the included studies, four learning outcomes (i.e. skill, attitude, knowledge, and satisfaction) were assessed. Ninety percent of the included studies assessed skill-related outcomes, with more than half mentioning significant improvement. Thirty percent of the included studies assessed outcomes-related knowledge and attitude, all of which reported the positive effects of simulation training. The simulators offered a variety of functional capabilities, while all of which simulated the clinical data entry process. In teaching health information systems, especially EHRs, simulation training enhances skill, attitude, knowledge, and satisfaction of health-care providers and students. Copyright:Entities:
Keywords: Computer user training; electronic health record; health information systems; simulation training
Year: 2022 PMID: 35281403 PMCID: PMC8893063 DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_17_21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Educ Health Promot ISSN: 2277-9531
Figure 1Flow diagram of the literature search and study selection
Main characteristics of the included studies (ranked according to year of publication)
| Authors (year), Country | Purpose | Study type | Intervention | Participants, practice | Outcome(s) | Results | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coons | To evaluate the impact of a virtual EHR and patient simulation on learning efficiency and student perception of their learning | RCT | Virtual EHR (DocuCare®, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins) | All 115 students enrolled into the required pharmacotherapy of cardiovascular diseases course (2015-16 academic year) | Time required to provide the most optimal recommendation (s) for each patient scenario | Use of the virtual EHR decreased the amount of time needed to provide the optimal treatment recommendations by 25% compared to the control 95% of students agreed or strongly agreed that the use of the EHR contributed positively to their learning and enabled them to efficiently learn new and challenging concepts. The virtual EHR improved domains related to perceptions of clinical skills, attitudes of ownership, and communication compared to baseline (P<0.001) | The virtual EHR demonstrated value in learning efficiency while providing students with an engaging means of practicing essential pharmacist functions in a simulated setting |
| Smith and Scholtz (2018),[ | To evaluate the impact of a simulated EHR on student performance and to describe students’ perceptions of preparedness to use an EHR in clinical practice | Quasi-experimental (posttest-only design with nonequivalent groups) | A simulated EHR (NiaRx System) | 3rd year pharmacy students | Students’ performance | No significant difference between groups on student performance (P=0.522) | Implementation of a simulated EHR did not show a difference in student performance, but did show improvements in students’ perceptions of preparedness to use an EHR in clinical practice |
| Elliott | To capture students’ experiences of the EPR simulation | Quasi-experimental (one-group posttest-only) | EPR mobile application simulation that included | 296, 3rd year student nurses | Student engagement with the EPR simulation | Student engagement with the various components was good, especially with regard to developing skill in using specific components of the EPR such as using clinical notes, patient details, vital signs and progress report | The study showed that the students were very positive about the EPR app and they were able to use the app successfully in simulation. The findings suggest that there is a need to incorporate EPRs into nursing education programmers |
| Zoghbi | To evaluate the effects of videos about EMR tasks on resident efficiency and confidence in performing essential perioperative tasks | Quasi-experimental (one-group pretest-posttest) | Videos on 7 key perioperative EMR tasks | Eleven surgery interns (2016 academic year) | Working time with EMR | All the interns’ times in seconds were statistically significant after watching the videos and performing the simulated emergencies (P<0.05) | This study demonstrates that brief videos on key perioperative EMR tasks and simulations are promising tools to increase interns’ ability and confidence in completing these tasks. This just-in-time educational intervention could improve workflow efficiency and enhances clinical performance, both of which may ultimately enhance perioperative patient safety |
| George | To investigate the impact of using a simulated EHR during high-fidelity human simulation | Quasi-experimental (one-group pretest-posttest) | A simulated HER (Neehr perfect) | A sample of 44 junior-level, pre-licensure, nursing students | Navigation time to complete an EHR | Navigation time improved significantly (P<0.0001) | Integration of a simulated EHR into high-fidelity simulation improves student speed while maintaining accuracy in the utilization of health care technologies |
| Shachak | To evaluate a prototype computer-based simulation to teach residents how to integrate better EMR use in the patient-physician interaction | Quasi-experimental (one-group pretest-posttest) | A simulated EMR | 16 family medicine residents | Competencies related to the use of the EMR in the consultation | Improved significantly from 14.88±2.63 before to 15.63±2.80 after using the simulation prototypes | The study suggests that computer-based simulation may be an effective and acceptable tool for teaching family medicine residents how to better use the EMR in the consultation |
| Vuk | To examine whether simulation training enhanced self-efficacy of physicians and nurses to use EMRs, and whether the training changed their perceptions about the importance of EMRs in helping patients and improving safety | Quasi-experimental (one-group pretest-posttest) | A simulated HER (epic systems) | 293 physicians and 94 nurses who worked in outpatient clinics where a new EMR was implemented | Confidence level | Statistically significant increase in the overall confidence level for physicians and nurses (P<0.05) | Simulation training enhanced physicians’ and nurses’ level of self-confidence and preparedness to use EMRs. To train health care providers how to use EMRs, simulation training should be considered as an interactive and effective method of teaching prior to implementation of EMRs in medical institutions |
| Rubbelke, | To evaluate ease of use and student acceptance of Google drive to create an interactive simulated EHR | Quasi-experimental (one-group posttest) | A simulated EHR | Nursing students (sample size not mentioned) | The opinion of the professors about the simulator | Faculty members have agreed that the simulated EHR is easy to set up for repeated simulations throughout the day. By adding a simulated EHR, students are able to incorporate documentation into their nursing care during the simulation experience, therefore enhancing organizational, time management, and critical thinking skills | Students enjoy the ability to document during the simulation experience and appreciate not having the burden of additional expenses. Faculty members are content with the system and enjoy the ability to work with a familiar product. During discussions, they have stated that the system is easy to use and appreciate the ability to review documentation during debriefing |
| Milano, | To develop and implement a simulated-EHR and to evaluated its educational effectiveness | Quasi-experimental (one-group posttest) | A simulated EHR | 129 third-year medical students and 12 internal medicine interns | Educational effectiveness of simulated EHR | About half (51%) of the students and almost all (92%) of the interns rated the activity as “effective” or “very effective;” the remaining 49% of students were evenly split between ratings of “neutral” and “ineffective” | The simulated EHR has a wide range of potential applications in clinical environments. The simulated EHR is a way to reinforce, in a safe learning environment, important behaviors required for maintaining a well-organized chart that reflects current standards for chronic disease and routine prevention |
| Borycki | To determine the effects of hands-on exposure to an HER upon undergraduate health informatics student competency development | Quasi-experimental (one-group pretest-posttest) | EHR educational portal | Students enrolled in a mandatory 3rd-year course in the undergraduate health informatics program Participants prior to hands-on use of the EHR=17 | Health informatics competencies (information management, clinical/health sciences, the Canadian health care system, and the management sciences) | Statistically significantly higher ratings (P<0.05) on 10 out of the 18 (56%) health informatics competency measures | The study shows that hands-on exposure to an EHR as a new addition to a course can lead to statistically significant improvements in student competency development in 10 health professional competency areas. Students became more sensitive to the ability of the EHRs to reduce medical errors and redundancy of information while improving healthcare organizational efficiency |
MAR=Medication administration record, EMR=Electronic medical records, EHR=Electronic health record, RCT=Root canal treatment, EPR=Electronic patient record
Characteristics of websites that provide health information system simulator
| Software name | Website | Trainee | Access method | Functional features | Nonfunctional features | User comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sim EMR |
| Doctors and nurses | Verification method through purchasing license | Data entry | Interactive | According to users, software has increased the quality of training |
| Sim chart |
| Nurses | Verification method through purchasing license | Data entry | Training videos | The software has increased student skills in Documenting and working with EHR |
| EHR tutor |
| Doctors and nurses | Verification method through purchasing license | Create patient charts during or after clinical rotations | Works on tablets, iPhone, and android devices | Not mentioned |
| Med affinity |
| Doctors and nurses | Verification method through purchasing license | Process | Live scenario editing | Students were satisfied with the software |
| VistA |
| Doctors and nurses | Free access | Data entry | Not mentioned | |
| Open EMR |
| Doctors and nurses | Free access | Data entry | Not mentioned | |
| DocUcare |
| Nursing | Verification method through purchasing license | Data entry | Students were satisfied with the software | |
| NEEHR |
| Nursing | Verification method through purchasing license | Data entry | Use any where | Not mentioned |
| Total | Nursing=8 | Free access=2 | Data entry=8 | - | - |
MAR=Medication administration record, EMR=Electronic medical records, EHR=Electronic health record, HIM=Health information management, PC=Personal computer
The categories of simulation outcomes and effects
| Outcome category | Outcomes | Effect | Number of studies | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Positive effect | No effect | |||||
|
| ||||||
| Statistically significant | Not stated about significance | Not statistically Significant | ||||
| Skill | Working time with a system | 15,21 | 7 | |||
| Clinical skill | 19 | |||||
| Competencies related to using the EMR | 22 | |||||
| Preparedness to use an EHR | 23 | 13,20 | ||||
| Students’ performance | 12 | |||||
| Accuracy to complete an EHR | 25 | 15 | ||||
| Health informatics competencies | 26 | |||||
| Knowledge | Efficiency of learning | 19 | 20 | 3 | ||
| Knowledge of EHR | 13,20 | |||||
| Educational effectiveness | 25 | |||||
| Attitude | Confidence level | 21,23 | 5 | |||
| Importance of EMRs in helping patients | 23 | |||||
| Effectiveness of EMRs to improve patients’ safety | 23 | |||||
| Student’s opinion and professors about the simulator | 24 | |||||
| Attitudes related to using the EMR | 22 | |||||
| Satisfaction | Satisfaction | 19 | 1 | |||
| Number of studies | 6 | 5 | 2 | - | - | |
EMR=Electronic medical records, EHR=Electronic health record