Literature DB >> 16818534

Adoption of electronic health records in primary care pediatric practices.

Alex R Kemper1, Rebecca L Uren, Sarah J Clark.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Electronic health records may improve care delivery. Although professional organizations and federal agencies encourage widespread adoption, no national data are available regarding the penetration of electronic health records into primary care pediatric practices.
METHODS: We used a national mail survey of 1000 randomly selected primary care pediatricians conducted from August to November 2005.
RESULTS: The response rate was 58%. Overall, 21.3% of respondents had an electronic health record in their practice. The likelihood of having an electronic health record increased with practice size. Those in a practice network were more likely to have an electronic health record than those in other settings. Smaller and independent practices were less likely to be considering implementing an electronic health record. Although most electronic health records include some pediatric-specific functionality such as the ability to record immunizations, many do not offer decision support; only approximately one third included immunization prompts or alerts for abnormal laboratory results. Cost was a barrier for nearly all of those without an electronic health record; half of the respondents questioned whether electronic health records lead to improvement in quality of care, and many could not identify an electronic health record that would meet their practice requirements.
CONCLUSIONS: Electronic health records are concentrated in larger and networked pediatric practices. Smaller and independent pediatric practices, the most common types of practice, are unlikely to adopt electronic health records until the cost of implementing and maintaining the systems decreases, developing standards for interoperability are adopted, and electronic health records are widely perceived to improve quality of care by practicing general pediatricians. The lack of decision support in current electronic health records may limit the ability of these tools to improve care delivery.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16818534     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2005-3000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  35 in total

1.  Racial differences in the usage of information technology: evidence from a national physician survey.

Authors:  Doohee Lee; Phil Rutsohn
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2012-04-01

2.  Geographic variation in ambulatory electronic health record adoption: implications for underserved communities.

Authors:  Jennifer King; Michael F Furukawa; Melinda B Buntin
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  The APA and the rise of pediatric generalist network research.

Authors:  Richard Wasserman; Janet R Serwint; Nathan Kuppermann; Rajendu Srivastava; Benard Dreyer
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.107

4.  Utilization of information technology in eastern North Carolina physician practices: determining the existence of a digital divide.

Authors:  David A Rosenthal; Elizabeth J Layman
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2008-02-13

5.  Physician specialty and variations in adoption of electronic health records.

Authors:  Z M Grinspan; S Banerjee; R Kaushal; L M Kern
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 6.  Electronic medical records (EMRs), epidemiology, and epistemology: reflections on EMRs and future pediatric clinical research.

Authors:  Richard C Wasserman
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.107

7.  Barriers to physicians' adoption of healthcare information technology: an empirical study on multiple hospitals.

Authors:  Chihung Lin; I-Chun Lin; Jinsheng Roan
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 4.460

8.  Electronic health records in small physician practices: availability, use, and perceived benefits.

Authors:  Sowmya R Rao; Catherine M Desroches; Karen Donelan; Eric G Campbell; Paola D Miralles; Ashish K Jha
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Are three methods better than one? A comparative assessment of usability evaluation methods in an EHR.

Authors:  Muhammad F Walji; Elsbeth Kalenderian; Mark Piotrowski; Duong Tran; Krishna K Kookal; Oluwabunmi Tokede; Joel M White; Ram Vaderhobli; Rachel Ramoni; Paul C Stark; Nicole S Kimmes; Maxim Lagerweij; Vimla L Patel
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 4.046

10.  Utilizing an electronic health record system to improve vaccination coverage in children.

Authors:  L Au; A Oster; G H Yeh; J Magno; H M Paek
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 2.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.