Literature DB >> 15498630

Physician and nurse satisfaction with an Electronic Medical Record system.

Antonios Likourezos1, Donald B Chalfin, Daniel G Murphy, Barbara Sommer, Kelly Darcy, Steven J Davidson.   

Abstract

Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) are intended to support clinical activity, improve efficiency, and reduce error. Reluctance to use EMRs may exist among clinicians. The purpose of this study was to assess physician and nurse satisfaction with an Emergency Department (ED) EMR. We surveyed Emergency Medicine (EM) physicians and nurses at a large urban teaching hospital after implementation of an Emergency Department EMR. The questionnaire assessed: 1) computer background and experience; 2) perceptions regarding EMR use; and 3) concerns about impact upon quality of patient care. The clinicians find the EMR easy to use and are generally satisfied with the impact on their work. However, they report that the EMR has no positive impact on patient care. They report confusion in following the sequence of screens, and are concerned with the amount of time it takes to use the EMR and the confidentiality of patient information. Similar results were found between physicians and nurses. Nurses, but not physicians, report that they are able to finish work much faster than before implementation (p < 0.05). We were unable to correlate computer background and experience with satisfaction with an EMR. This survey suggests that EM physicians and nurses favor the use of an EMR and suggests opportunities for EMR enhancement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15498630     DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2004.03.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0736-4679            Impact factor:   1.484


  32 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of factors influencing the adoption of information and communication technologies by healthcare professionals.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre Gagnon; Marie Desmartis; Michel Labrecque; Josip Car; Claudia Pagliari; Pierre Pluye; Pierre Frémont; Johanne Gagnon; Nadine Tremblay; France Légaré
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Adoption and Barriers to Adoption of Electronic Health Records by Nurses in Three Governmental Hospitals in Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Azza El Mahalli
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2015-11-01

3.  An electronic medical record in primary care: impact on satisfaction, work efficiency and clinic processes.

Authors:  David Joos; Qingxia Chen; James Jirjis; Kevin B Johnson
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

4.  Correlates of electronic health record adoption in office practices: a statewide survey.

Authors:  Steven R Simon; Rainu Kaushal; Paul D Cleary; Chelsea A Jenter; Lynn A Volk; Eric G Poon; E John Orav; Helen G Lo; Deborah H Williams; David W Bates
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 5.  Methods to evaluate health information systems in healthcare settings: a literature review.

Authors:  Bahlol Rahimi; Vivian Vimarlund
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.460

6.  An enhanced security solution for electronic medical records based on AES hybrid technique with SOAP/XML and SHA-1.

Authors:  M L Mat Kiah; Mohamed S Nabi; B B Zaidan; A A Zaidan
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  Registered nurses' use of electronic health records: findings from a national survey.

Authors:  Catherine DesRoches; Karen Donelan; Peter Buerhaus; Li Zhonghe
Journal:  Medscape J Med       Date:  2008-07-15

8.  Nurses' views on electronic medical records (EMR) in Turkey: an analysis according to use, quality and user satisfaction.

Authors:  Mehmet Top; Omer Gider
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 4.460

9.  Evaluation of an electronic medical record system at an opioid agonist treatment program.

Authors:  Lawrence S Brown; Steven Kritz; Melissa Lin; Roberto Zavala
Journal:  J Addict Med       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.702

10.  Employing the FITT framework to explore HIV case managers' perceptions of two electronic clinical data (ECD) summary systems.

Authors:  Rebecca Schnall; Ann B Smith; Manik Sikka; Peter Gordon; Eli Camhi; Timothy Kanter; Suzanne Bakken
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 4.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.