Julia Adler-Milstein1, A Jay Holmgren1, Peter Kralovec2, Chantal Worzala3, Talisha Searcy4, Vaishali Patel4. 1. Schools of Information and Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 2. Health Forum, Chicago, IL, USA. 3. American Hospital Association, Washington, DC, USA. 4. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, Washington, DC, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: While most hospitals have adopted electronic health records (EHRs), we know little about whether hospitals use EHRs in advanced ways that are critical to improving outcomes, and whether hospitals with fewer resources - small, rural, safety-net - are keeping up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using 2008-2015 American Hospital Association Information Technology Supplement survey data, we measured "basic" and "comprehensive" EHR adoption among hospitals to provide the latest national numbers. We then used new supplement questions to assess advanced use of EHRs and EHR data for performance measurement and patient engagement functions. To assess a digital "advanced use" divide, we ran logistic regression models to identify hospital characteristics associated with high adoption in each advanced use domain. RESULTS: We found that 80.5% of hospitals adopted at least a basic EHR system, a 5.3 percentage point increase from 2014. Only 37.5% of hospitals adopted at least 8 (of 10) EHR data for performance measurement functions, and 41.7% of hospitals adopted at least 8 (of 10) patient engagement functions. Critical access hospitals were less likely to have adopted at least 8 performance measurement functions (odds ratio [OR] = 0.58; P < .001) and at least 8 patient engagement functions (OR = 0.68; P = 0.02). DISCUSSION: While the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act resulted in widespread hospital EHR adoption, use of advanced EHR functions lags and a digital divide appears to be emerging, with critical-access hospitals in particular lagging behind. This is concerning, because EHR-enabled performance measurement and patient engagement are key contributors to improving hospital performance. CONCLUSION: Hospital EHR adoption is widespread and many hospitals are using EHRs to support performance measurement and patient engagement. However, this is not happening across all hospitals.
OBJECTIVE: While most hospitals have adopted electronic health records (EHRs), we know little about whether hospitals use EHRs in advanced ways that are critical to improving outcomes, and whether hospitals with fewer resources - small, rural, safety-net - are keeping up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using 2008-2015 American Hospital Association Information Technology Supplement survey data, we measured "basic" and "comprehensive" EHR adoption among hospitals to provide the latest national numbers. We then used new supplement questions to assess advanced use of EHRs and EHR data for performance measurement and patient engagement functions. To assess a digital "advanced use" divide, we ran logistic regression models to identify hospital characteristics associated with high adoption in each advanced use domain. RESULTS: We found that 80.5% of hospitals adopted at least a basic EHR system, a 5.3 percentage point increase from 2014. Only 37.5% of hospitals adopted at least 8 (of 10) EHR data for performance measurement functions, and 41.7% of hospitals adopted at least 8 (of 10) patient engagement functions. Critical access hospitals were less likely to have adopted at least 8 performance measurement functions (odds ratio [OR] = 0.58; P < .001) and at least 8 patient engagement functions (OR = 0.68; P = 0.02). DISCUSSION: While the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act resulted in widespread hospital EHR adoption, use of advanced EHR functions lags and a digital divide appears to be emerging, with critical-access hospitals in particular lagging behind. This is concerning, because EHR-enabled performance measurement and patient engagement are key contributors to improving hospital performance. CONCLUSION: Hospital EHR adoption is widespread and many hospitals are using EHRs to support performance measurement and patient engagement. However, this is not happening across all hospitals.
Authors: Ashish K Jha; Matthew F Burke; Catherine DesRoches; Maulik S Joshi; Peter D Kralovec; Eric G Campbell; Melinda B Buntin Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Catherine M DesRoches; Chantal Worzala; Maulik S Joshi; Peter D Kralovec; Ashish K Jha Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2012-04-24 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Joshua R Vest; Hye-Young Jung; Kevin Wiley; Harold Kooreman; Lorren Pettit; Mark A Unruh Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2018-12-20 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Ann Kutney-Lee; Douglas M Sloane; Kathryn H Bowles; Lawton R Burns; Linda H Aiken Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2019-02-20 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Zoe Co; A Jay Holmgren; David C Classen; Lisa Newmark; Diane L Seger; Melissa Danforth; David W Bates Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Danielle E Kurant; Jason M Baron; Genti Strazimiri; Kent B Lewandrowski; Joseph W Rudolf; Anand S Dighe Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2018-07-11 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Celine Latulipe; Syeda Fatema Mazumder; Rachel K W Wilson; Jennifer W Talton; Alain G Bertoni; Sara A Quandt; Thomas A Arcury; David P Miller Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Aleena Banerji; Kenneth H Lai; Yu Li; Rebecca R Saff; Carlos A Camargo; Kimberly G Blumenthal; Li Zhou Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract Date: 2019-12-16