Literature DB >> 19642147

The utility of simulation in medical education: what is the evidence?

Yasuharu Okuda1, Ethan O Bryson, Samuel DeMaria, Lisa Jacobson, Joshua Quinones, Bing Shen, Adam I Levine.   

Abstract

Medical schools and residencies are currently facing a shift in their teaching paradigm. The increasing amount of medical information and research makes it difficult for medical education to stay current in its curriculum. As patients become increasingly concerned that students and residents are "practicing" on them, clinical medicine is becoming focused more on patient safety and quality than on bedside teaching and education. Educators have faced these challenges by restructuring curricula, developing small-group sessions, and increasing self-directed learning and independent research. Nevertheless, a disconnect still exists between the classroom and the clinical environment. Many students feel that they are inadequately trained in history taking, physical examination, diagnosis, and management. Medical simulation has been proposed as a technique to bridge this educational gap. This article reviews the evidence for the utility of simulation in medical education. We conducted a MEDLINE search of original articles and review articles related to simulation in education with key words such as simulation, mannequin simulator, partial task simulator, graduate medical education, undergraduate medical education, and continuing medical education. Articles, related to undergraduate medical education, graduate medical education, and continuing medical education were used in the review. One hundred thirteen articles were included in this review. Simulation-based training was demonstrated to lead to clinical improvement in 2 areas of simulation research. Residents trained on laparoscopic surgery simulators showed improvement in procedural performance in the operating room. The other study showed that residents trained on simulators were more likely to adhere to the advanced cardiac life support protocol than those who received standard training for cardiac arrest patients. In other areas of medical training, simulation has been demonstrated to lead to improvements in medical knowledge, comfort in procedures, and improvements in performance during retesting in simulated scenarios. Simulation has also been shown to be a reliable tool for assessing learners and for teaching topics such as teamwork and communication. Only a few studies have shown direct improvements in clinical outcomes from the use of simulation for training. Multiple studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of simulation in the teaching of basic science and clinical knowledge, procedural skills, teamwork, and communication as well as assessment at the undergraduate and graduate medical education levels. As simulation becomes increasingly prevalent in medical school and resident education, more studies are needed to see if simulation training improves patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19642147     DOI: 10.1002/msj.20127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mt Sinai J Med        ISSN: 0027-2507


  193 in total

1.  Patient simulation in pharmacy education.

Authors:  Amy L Seybert
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Physical assessment experience in a problem-based learning course.

Authors:  Justin J Sherman; Daniel M Riche; Kayla R Stover
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 3.  Simulation and introductory pharmacy practice experiences.

Authors:  Katherine Lin; Dimitra V Travlos; Jeffrey W Wadelin; Peter H Vlasses
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 4.  [Organ protective intensive care treatment and simulation-based training].

Authors:  J W Rey; T Ott; D Bösebeck; S Welschehold; P R Galle; C Werner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Low-Cost Simulation: How-To Guide.

Authors:  Herodotos Ellinas; Kathryn Denson; Deborah Simpson
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2015-06

Review 6.  Educational Tools: Thinking Outside the Box.

Authors:  Majka Woods; Mark E Rosenberg
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 8.237

7.  Simulation in internal medicine training.

Authors:  Ashraf Gohar; Eyad Al-hihi
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr

8.  A virtual patient software program to improve pharmacy student learning in a comprehensive disease management course.

Authors:  Mark A Douglass; Jillian P Casale; J Andrew Skirvin; Margarita V DiVall
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 2.047

9.  An active one-lobe pulmonary simulator with compliance control for medical training in neonatal mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Ilaria Baldoli; Selene Tognarelli; Francesca Cecchi; Rosa Teresa Scaramuzzo; Massimiliano Ciantelli; Marzia Gentile; Armando Cuttano; Cecilia Laschi; Arianna Menciassi; Antonio Boldrini; Paolo Dario
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 2.502

10.  Constructing a Novel Simple LEEP Training Model.

Authors:  Christen L Walters; Jenny M Whitworth; Sharon L Tyra; Julie B Walsh-Covarrubias; J Michael Straughn
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2013-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.