| Literature DB >> 35011722 |
Mengping Liu1, Lin Wang1, Young Lo1, Simon Chi-Chin Shiu1, Andrew B Kinghorn1, Julian A Tanner1,2.
Abstract
A wide variety of nanomaterials have emerged in recent years with advantageous properties for a plethora of therapeutic and diagnostic applications. Such applications include drug delivery, imaging, anti-cancer therapy and radiotherapy. There is a critical need for further components which can facilitate therapeutic targeting, augment their physicochemical properties, or broaden their theranostic applications. Aptamers are single-stranded nucleic acids which have been selected or evolved to bind specifically to molecules, surfaces, or cells. Aptamers can also act as direct biologic therapeutics, or in imaging and diagnostics. There is a rich field of discovery at the interdisciplinary interface between nanomaterials and aptamer science that has significant potential across biomedicine. Herein, we review recent progress in aptamer-enabled materials and discuss pending challenges for their future biomedical application.Entities:
Keywords: aptamers; bioimaging; drug delivery; nanomaterials; therapy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35011722 PMCID: PMC8750369 DOI: 10.3390/cells11010159
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 6.600
Figure 1Illustration of the aptamer selection process. Typically, four steps are involved in the SELEX cycle. Step 1, the single-stranded DNA or RNA library is incubated with target molecules. Step 2, the bound sequences are separated from unbound strands and recovered for further process. Step 3, the target-binding sequences are amplified by PCR. RNA molecules need additional transcription procedures for amplification purposes. Step 4, single-stranded DNA/RNA sequences are re-generated from PCR products as a new library for the next round of selection. Through several iterative cycles, aptamers can be identified by sequencing and characterization assays.
Figure 2Applications of aptamer-functionalized drug delivery nanocarriers. Aptamer-incorporated drug nanocarriers can be designed for (a) targeted drug delivery, (b) controllable drug release, and (c) imaging-guided therapy. In (b), drugs captured by conformation-switchable aptamers or other stimulus-responsive agents can be programmatically released in response to the environmental stimuli. In (c), imaging signals can be designed to release with payloads or upon binding to target cells, enabling guiding and tracking of therapeutics in vivo.
Figure 3Schematic representation of DNA nanostructure assembly. (a) DNA nanotrain with aptamers assembled via complementary sequence. Modified with permission from reference [64]. Copyright 2013 PNAS. (b) Assembly of DNA tetrahedron through simple extension of strands. Modified with permission from reference [65]. Copyright 2019 RSC publishing. (c) Aptamer guided and gated the delivery of therapeutic drugs. Adapted from reference [66]. Copyright 2017 ACS publications.
Figure 4Schematic illustration of aptamer-functionalized micelles. They have been used to, (a) specifically deliver DOX to WR22Rν1 tumor-bearing mice for anti-prostate cancer therapy and (b) mediate pH/NIR-responsive breast cancer-specific imaging and therapy. (a) is modified with permission from reference [98]. Copyright 2013 Elsevier. (b) is adapted from reference [102]. Copyright 2014 Wiley Online Library.
Figure 5Schematic representation of the gel-sol transition of aptamer-decorated hydrogels. For target capture, aptamers in hydrogels would be de-hybridized from complementary strands to capture targets. For target release, aptamer-captured targets are released via a competitive hybridization from complementary oligonucleotides of aptamers or aptamer holders.
Figure 6Schematic illustration of aptamer-functionalized polymeric nanoparticles and branched polymers. (a) Polymeric nanoparticles. (b) Branched polymeric nanostructures.
Figure 7Schematic representation of aptamer-decorated gold nanostructures. They have been used to track A549-specifc tumors via gold-enhanced SERS imaging and kill tumor cells through NIR-triggered chemo-hyperthermia. It’s modified with permission from ref. [149]. Copyright 2019 RSC publishing.
Figure 8Schematic illustration of aptamer-functionalized magnetic nanomaterials. They have been used to (a) monitor the specific MRI-guided anti-prostate cancer therapy via DOX and (b) perform synergistic anti-cancer therapy mediated by DOX and hyperthermia in the guidance of MR imaging. (a) is adapted from reference [155]. Copyright 2011 Wiley Online Library. (b) is modified with permission of reference [157]. Copyright 2019 Elsevier.
Figure 9Schematic diagram of aptamer-empowered QDs nanomaterials. (a) ATP-triggered DOX release and FRET-guided targeted anti-cancer therapy. It’s modified with permission of reference [164]. Copyright 2015 ACS publishing. (b) UV-mediated FRET imaging and ROS-driven targeted photodynamic therapy of cervical cancer. It’s modified with permission of reference [165]. Copyright 2016 RSC publishing.
Figure 10Illustration of aptamer-decorated silica nanomaterials. They have been used to, (a) control the release of Ru(bipy)32+ by de-hybridizing from complementary oligos in a ATP-responsive manner, and (b) guide BMPP-Pt to specifically image and suppress Huh7 cancer cells. (a) is modified with permission of reference [178]. Copyright 2012 ACS publishing. (b) is adapted from reference [186]. Copyright 2018 RSC publishing.
Figure 11Schematic illustration of aptamer-functionalized carbon and liposome nanomaterials. (a,b) are aptamer-decorated versatile carbon and liposome nanomaterials, respectively.
Advantages and disadvantages of aptamer-based therapeutics developed with different strategies.
| Aptamer-Based Therapeutics | Functionalized Nanomaterials | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aptamer-enabled biological material system | Protein drugs [ | 1. Inherent drug efficacy | 1. Immune response |
| Nucleic acid drugs [ | 1. Low synthetic cost | 1. Susceptibility to nuclease degradation | |
| DNA nanostructures [ | 1. Programmed drug capture and release | 1. Susceptibility to nuclease degradation | |
| Aptamer-enabled non-biological material system | Micelles [ | 1. Ease of assembly | 1. Limited payload capacity |
| Hydrogels [ | 1. Highly hydrophilic and biocompatible | 1. Low tensile strength | |
| Polymeric nanoparticles [ | 1. Controllable and sustained drug release | 1. Difficulty to scale-up the Manufacturing | |
| Branched polymeric Nanostructures [ | 1. Increased solubility of lipophilic drugs | 1. High production cost | |
| Gold nanoparticles [ | 1. Ease of synthesis | 1. Difficulty for degradation and plasma clearance | |
| Magnetic nanoparticles [ | 1. High payload capacity | 1. Highly magnet-dependent | |
| Quantum dots [ | 1. Fluorescence-guided drug delivery | 1. Rapid renal filtration | |
| Silica nanoparticles [ | 1. High payload capacity | 1. Only allow intravenous injection for administration | |
| Carbon materials [ | 1. High payload capacity | 1. High hydrophobicity | |
| Liposomes [ | 1. Low cytotoxicity | 1. Accelerated blood or reticuloendothelial system clearance |