| Literature DB >> 36004972 |
Qingqing Zhou1, Zhigang Xu1, Zhimin Liu1.
Abstract
Molecular imprinting-aptamer techniques exhibit the advantages of molecular imprinting and aptamer technology. Hybrids of molecularly imprinted polymer-aptamer (MIP-aptamer) prepared by this technique have higher stability, binding affinity and superior selectivity than conventional molecularly imprinted polymers or aptamers. In recent years, molecular imprinting-aptamer technologies have attracted considerable interest for the selective recognition of target molecules in complex sample matrices and have been used in molecular recognition such as antibiotics, proteins, viruses and pesticides. This review introduced the development of molecular imprinting-aptamer-combining technologies and summarized the mechanism of MIP-aptamer formation. Meanwhile, we discussed the challenges in preparing MIP-aptamer. Finally, we summarized the application of MIP-aptamer to the molecular recognition in disease diagnosis, environmental analysis, food safety and other fields.Entities:
Keywords: aptamer; molecular recognition; molecularly imprinted polymer
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36004972 PMCID: PMC9406215 DOI: 10.3390/bios12080576
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biosensors (Basel) ISSN: 2079-6374
Comparison of MIP, aptamer and MIP-aptamer.
| Properties | MIP | Aptamer | MIP–Aptamer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity | Low | Medium | Ultrahigh |
| Selectivity | Medium | High | Ultrahigh |
| Affinity | Low | High | High |
| Stability | High | Medium | High |
Applications of MIP–aptamer during 2013–2022.
| Analyte | Sample | Method | Linearity Range | LOD | Year | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proteins, Thrombin and PDGF- | urine, tears | Visual detection | - | - | 2013 | [ |
| Cytochrome C | urine, serum | Fluorescence | 0.20–2.00 μM | 0.054 μM | 2018 | [ |
| Glycoprotein alkaline phosphatase | human serum | Plasmonic immunosandwich assay | - | - | 2019 | [ |
| Thrombin | bovine blood | Electrochemical | 2.5 × 10−9–1.3 × 10−6 mg/mL | 1.6 × 10−10 mg/mL | 2019 | [ |
| Ochratoxin A | beer | High-performance liquid chromatography-fluorescence | 0.05–1.00 ng/mL | 0.07 ng/mL | 2020 | [ |
| Cardiac Troponin I | human serum | Voltammetric | 0.50–3.3 × 105 pM | 1.04 pM | 2020 | [ |
| Alpha-fetoprotein | human serum | Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry | 20–1000 ng/mL | 0.5 ng/mL | 2020 | [ |
| Amyloid- | human serum | Electrochemical | 5 pg/mL to 10 ng/ mL | 1.22 pg/mL | 2020 | [ |
| Thrombin | serum | Colorimetric | 1.08 × 10−10–2.7 × 10−5 mol/L | 2.7 × 10−11 mol/L | 2021 | [ |
| Trypsin | blood human serum and urine | In situ electropolymerization | 1–90 pg/mL | 0.75 pg/mL | 2022 | [ |
| Prostate specific antigen | human serum | Electrochemical | 100 pg/mL–100 ng/mL | 1 pg/mL | 2016 | [ |
| Dopamine | serum | Electrochemical | 5.0 × 10−8–1.0 × 10−5 mol/L | 4.7 × 10−8 mol/L | 2021 | [ |
| Factor IX protein | human plasma serum | Electrochemical | 0.8 fM to 0.8 nM | 40 fM | 2022 | [ |
| Exosomes | serum | Fluorescence | 1.19 × 10−6–4.76 ×10−5 mol/L | 2.27 × 10−6 mol/L | 2022 | [ |
| Lincomycin | meat | Electrochemical | 5.0 × 10−12–1.0 × 10−9 mol/L | 1.6 × 10−13 mol/L | 2017 | [ |
| Enrofloxacin | fish | Fluorescence | - | 0.04 ng/mL | 2017 | [ |
| Kanamycin | water, milk and urine | Fluorescence | 8.6 × 10−8–1.7 × 10−5 mol/L | 2.2 × 10−8 mol/L | 2018 | [ |
| Tetracycline | milk | Electrochemical | 5× 10−4–1000 nM | 1.4 × 10−4 nM | 2019 | [ |
| Chloramphenicol | milk | Electrochemical | 1.0 pM to 1.0 nM | 0.3 pM | 2019 | [ |
| Kanamycin | milk, tap, artesian groundwater | Electrochemical | 10.00–500.00 nM | 1.87 nM | 2020 | [ |
| Moxifloxacin | Electrochemical | 0.001–1 µM | 0.51 nM | 2021 | [ | |
| Hepatitis C virus | human serum | Electrochemical | 5.0 fg/mL–1.0 pg/mL | 1.67 fg/mL | 2018 | [ |
| Hepatitis B virus | human serum | resonance light scattering | 0.04–0.1 nmol/L | 0.011 nmol/L | 2021 | [ |
| Hepatitis B virus | human blood | Fluorescence | 10–3500 pmol/L | 1.8 pmol/L | 2021 | [ |
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa | blood | Electrochemical | 101 to107 CFU/mL | 1 CFU/mL | 2021 | [ |
| Trinitrotoluene | soil, river water | Electrochemical | 0.01 fM to 1.5 μM | 3.5 × 10−9 nmol/L | 2017 | [ |
| Carbofuran | fruit, vegetable | Electrochemical | 0.2–50 nM | 67 pM | 2018 | [ |
| Chlorpyrifos | apples, lettuce | Electrochemical | 1 × 10−6–400 × 10−6 nM | 0.35 fM | 2018 | [ |
| Urea | soil, water | Impedance spectroscopy | 0.005–500 nM | 900 fM | 2019 | [ |
| Melamine | milk | Electrochemical | 10−12–10−4 mol/L | 6.7 × 10−13 mol/L | 2021 | [ |
| Aflatoxin B1 | milk | Electrochemical | 50.0 pg/L to 3.5 ng/L | 12.0 pg/L | 2022 | [ |
| Histamine | human blood plasma, canned tuna fish | Differential pulse voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy | 0.46–35 nmol/L | 0.15 nmol/L and 0.11 nmol/L | 2020 | [ |
Figure 1General description of the synthesis process of MIP–aptamer.
Figure 2Schematic illustration of the principle and procedure for preparing aptamer–MIP hybrids. Reproduced with permission from [26]. Copyright American Chemical Society, 2019.
Figure 3Schematic illustration of the preparation and recognition process for fluorescent aptamer functionalized molecularly imprinted polymers. Reproduced with permission from [42]. Copyright Elsevier, 2018.
Figure 4Construction and detection principle of MIP–aptamer. Reproduced with permission from [46]. Copyright Springer, 2021.
Figure 5Fabrication of the fluorescence MIP–aptamer sensor for Cd2+ detection. Reproduced with permission from [67]. Copyright Springer, 2019.
Figure 6Fabrication of MIP–aptamer microfluidic chip for the detection of carbofuran. Reproduced with permission from [49]. Copyright Springer, 2018.