| Literature DB >> 34208143 |
Rafael Molina-Luque1,2, Natalia Ulloa3,4,5, Manuel Romero-Saldaña1,2, Martin Zilic6, Andrea Gleisner7, Fabián Lanuza5,8,9, Guillermo Molina-Recio1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The increasing prevalence of obesity in children has raised the incidence of Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) in this age group. Given the short- and long-term health impact of MetS, it is essential to prevent its onset by detecting its main triggers. Besides, genetic factors play an essential role in influencing which individuals within a population are most likely to develop obesity in response to a particular environment. In this regard, a common variation in the FTO gene is reproducibly associated with BMI and obesity from childhood and the genetic load has been linked to several cardiovascular risk factors, highlighting the FTO single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs9939609. Therefore, this study aimed to establish the relationship between the FTO SNP rs9939609 and MetS.Entities:
Keywords: FTO gene; children; metabolic syndrome
Year: 2021 PMID: 34208143 PMCID: PMC8230726 DOI: 10.3390/nu13062014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Descriptive characteristics of the sample and according to the FTO genotype.
| Mean or | 95% Confidence Interval | |
|---|---|---|
| Sex | ||
| Male | 110 (50) | 43.205–56.795 |
| Female | 110 (50) | 43.205–56.795 |
| Age (years) | 9.09 (1.27) | 8.921–9.259 |
| Tanner | ||
| Prepubertal | 156 (70.6) | 64.106–76.509 |
| Pubertal | 65 (29.4) | 23.491–35.894 |
| Weight (kg) | 41.18 (10.82) | 39.742–39.742 |
| Height (cm) | 135.18 (9.03) | 133.98–136.38 |
| WC (cm) | 74.55 (11.56) | 73.014–76.086 |
| WHtR | 0.55 (0.07) | 0.541–0.559 |
| WHtR ≥ 0.55 | ||
| Yes | 127 (57.7) | 50.905–64.338 |
| No | 93 (42.3) | 35.662–49.095 |
| BMI | 1.52 (0.83) | 1.410–1.630 |
| Obesity | ||
| Yes | 73 (33.2) | 26.997–39.827 |
| No | 147 (66.8) | 60.173–73.003 |
| BF% | 30.01 (9.46) | 28.753–28.753 |
| FM (kg) | 13.34 (6.75) | 12.443–14.237 |
| FFM (kg) | 28.38 (5.07) | 27.706–29.054 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 101.55 (12) | 99.955–103. 145 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 66.07 (10.65) | 64.655–67.485 |
| HBP | ||
| Yes | 63 (28.5) | 22.654–34.947 |
| No | 158 (71.5) | 65.053–77.346 |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 88.28 (8.56) | 87.143–89.417 |
| Insulin (μU/mL) | 8.6 (6.85) | 7.690–9.510 |
| HOMA-IR | 1.86 (1.36) | 1.679–2.041 |
| TG (mg/dL) | 123.1 (73.87) | 113.285–132.915 |
| TC (mg/dL) | 181.84 (33.1) | 177.442–186.238 |
| HDL-C (mg/dL) | 50.51 (11.66) | 48.961–52.059 |
| LDL-C (mg/dL) | 108.26 (28.9) | 104.420–112.100 |
| MetS-Comp | ||
| 0 | 51 (23.2) | 17.774–29.327 |
| 1 | 53 (24.1) | 18.597–30.297 |
| 2 | 57 (25.9) | 20.253–32.227 |
| 3 | 40 (18.2) | 32.227–23.925 |
| 4 | 19 (8.6) | 5.280–13.158 |
| MetS | ||
| Yes | 59 (26.8) | 21.085–33.187 |
| No | 161 (73.2) | 66.813–78.915 |
Tanner: physical development according to Tanner stage; WC: Waist circumference; WHtR: Waist-to-Height Ratio; BMI: Body Mass Index (z-score); BF%: Body Fat Percentage; FFM: Fat Free Mass; SBP: Systolic Blood Pressure; DBP: Diastolic Blood Pressure; HBP: High Blood Pressure (according to Cook); HOMA-IR: Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance; TG: Triglycerides; TC: Total Cholesterol; HDL-C: High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol; LDL-C: Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol; MetS-Comp: Number of Metabolic Syndrome components showed (according to modified criteria from Cook); MetS: Presence of Metabolic Syndrome (according to modified criteria from Cook).
FTO genotype and metabolic syndrome Δ.
| TT | TA | AA |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean or | Mean or | Mean or | ||
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 50 (43.9) | 33 (55.9) | 27 (57.4) | 0.166 |
| Female | 64 (56.1) | 26 (44.1) | 20 (42.6) | |
| Age (years) | 9.24 (1.18) | 8.84 (1.33) | 9.05 (1.37) | 0.15 |
| Tanner | ||||
| Prepubertal | 79 (68.7) | 44 (74.6) | 33 (70.2) | 0.721 |
| Pubertal | 36 (31.3) | 15 (25.4) | 14 (29.8) | |
| Weight (kg) | 39.49 (10.15) * | 40.89 (10.13) | 45.64 (12.12) * | 0.004 |
| Height (cm) | 135.04 (8.32) | 134.15 (10.04) | 136.82 (9.32) | 0.31 |
| WC (cm) | 72.83 (11.11) | 74.64 (11.2) | 78.59 (12.29) | 0.015 |
| WHtR | 0.54 (0.07) * | 0.56 (0.07) | 0.57 (0.07) * | 0.013 |
| WHtR ≥ 0.55 | ||||
| Yes | 57 (50) | 37 (62.7) | 33 (70.2) | 0.041 |
| No | 57 (50) | 22 (37.3) | 14 (29.8) | |
| BMI | 1.33 (0.82) * | 1.62 (0.81) | 1.83 (0.75) * | 0.001 |
| Obesity | ||||
| Yes | 66 (57.9) | 42 (71.2) | 8 (17) | 0.006 |
| No | 48 (42.1) | 17 (28.8) | 39 (83) | |
| BF% | 28.3 (8.95) * | 30.7 (8.89) | 33.76 (10.36) * | 0.004 |
| FM (kg) | 12 (6.12) * | 13.42 (6.11) | 16.54 (7.95) * | 0.001 |
| FFM (kg) | 27.82 (4.79) | 28.36 (5.01) | 29.78 (5.63) | 0.093 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 99.74 (11.78) | 103.17 (11.5) | 103.94 (12.62) | 0.063 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 64.97 (10.16) | 67.46 (10.17) | 67 (12.23) | 0.278 |
| HBP | ||||
| Yes | 24 (20.9) | 23 (39) | 16 (34) | 0.028 |
| No | 91 (79.1) | 36 (61) | 31 (66) | |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 87.53 (7.66) | 90.8 (9.65) | 86.91 (8.68) | 0.108 |
| Insulin (μU/mL) | 7.25 (4.52) * | 8.51 (5.35) $ | 11.95 (11.01) * $ | <0.001 |
| HOMA-IR | 1.57 (0.99) | 1.94 (1.29) | 2.46 (1.92) | 0.004 Ç |
| TG (mg/dL) | 115.38 (56.01) | 113.61 (77.09) | 153.59 (97.8) | 0.051 Ç |
| TC (mg/dL) | 184 (32.83) | 181.5 (32.79) | 177 (34.46) | 0.476 |
| HDL-C (mg/dL) | 51.34 (11.79) * | 53.11 (9.98) $ | 45.27 (11.91) * $ | 0.001 |
| LDL-C (mg/dL) | 110.46 (30.11) | 107.94 (26.23) | 103.33 (28.89) | 0.362 |
| MetS-Comp | ||||
| 0 | 33 (28.9) | 10 (16.9) | 8 (17) | 0.062 |
| 1 | 29 (25.4) | 18 (30.5) | 6 (12.8) | |
| 2 | 29 (25.4) | 16 (27.1) | 12 (25.5) | |
| 3 | 16 (14) | 11 (18.6) | 13 (27.7) | |
| 4 | 7 (6.1) | 4 (6.8) | 8 (17) | |
| MetS | ||||
| Yes | 23 (20.2) | 15 (25.4) | 21 (44.7) | 0.006 |
| No | 91 (79.8) | 44 (74.6) | 26 (55.3) |
Qualitative variables have been represented by frequency and percentage (in brackets). Quantitative variables have been represented by the mean and standard deviation (in brackets) Tanner: physical development according to Tanner stage; WC: Waist circumference; WHtR: Waist-to-Height Ratio; BMI: Body Mass Index (z-score); BF%: Body Fat Percentage; FFM: Fat Free Mass; SBP: Systolic Blood Pressure; DBP: Diastolic Blood Pressure; HBP: High Blood Pressure (according to Cook); HOMA-IR: Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance; TG: Triglycerides; TC: Total Cholesterol; HDL-C: High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol; LDL-C: Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol; MetS-Comp: Number of Metabolic Syndrome components showed (according to modified criteria from Cook); MetS: Presence of Metabolic Syndrome (according to modified criteria from Cook) * $ Significant differences between groups (Bonferroni post hoc) Ç Result of the Kruskal-Wallis test, applied when significant differences between variances. In these cases, post hoc tests have not been computed.
Prevalence ratios of the components according to variability of the FTO gene Δ.
| Variable | TT | TA | AA |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HBP | 1 (Ref.) | 0.53 (0.38–0.75) | 1.6 (1.3–1.9) | <0.001 | NS |
| TG | 1 (Ref.) | 0.82 (0.57–1.19) | 1.26 (0.93–1.7) | NS | NS |
| WC | 1 (Ref.) | 1.25 (0.96–1.64) | 1.53 (1.2–1.95) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Glucose | 1 (Ref.) | 3.9 (1.54–9.86) | 1.22 (0.32–4.69) | 0.004 | NS |
| HDL-C | 1 (Ref.) | 0.35 (0.13–0.97) | 1.98 (1.18–3,34) | <0.001 | 0.048 |
Following Cook criteria to consider the presence of metabolic syndrome component: HBP (SBP or DBP > 90th percentile); TG >110 mg/dL; WC > 90th percentile; Glucose > 100 mg/dL and HDL-C < 40 mg/dL. HBP: High Blood Pressure; TG: Triglycerides, WC: Waist circumference; HDL-C: High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol; NS: Non-significative. p * Significance of the differences inter-levels. p ** Significance Level of linear trend test.
Prevalence ratios of the number of the Metabolic Syndrome components according to variability of the FTO gene Δ.
| Variable | TT | TA | AA |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 (Ref.) | 0.58 (0.31–1.1) | 0.59 (0.29–1.18) | NS | NS |
| 1 | 1 (Ref.) | 1.2 (0.73–1.97) | 0.5 (0.22–1.13) | NS | NS |
| 2 | 1 (Ref.) | 1.07 (0.63–1.8) | 1 (0.56–1.79) | NS | NS |
| 3 | 1 (Ref.) | 1.33 (0.66–2.68) | 1.97 (1.03–3.77) | NS | 0.045 |
| 4 | 1 (Ref.) | 1.1 (0.34–3.62) | 2.77 (1.06–7.21) | NS | 0.042 |
| 5ç | 1 (Ref.) | – | – | – | – |
| MetS | 1 (Ref.) | 1.26 (0.71–2.23) | 2.21 (1.36–3.59) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Following Cook criteria to consider the presence of metabolic syndrome component: BPH (SBP or DBP > 90th percentile); TG >110 mg/dL; WC > 90th percentile; Glucose > 100 mg/dL and HDL-C < 40 mg/dL. S: Non-significative. p * Significance of the differences inter-levels. p ** Significance Level of linear trend test. No-one in the sample showed all five components.
Lineal multiple regression for assessing the relation between FTO types and the cardiometabolic status Δ.
| β | Standardized β |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| TT | Reference | ||||
| TA | 3.498 | 0.144 | 2.488 | 0.378 | 0.014 |
| AA | 7.289 | 0.277 | 4.828 | <0.001 | |
|
| |||||
| TT | Reference | ||||
| TA | 3.711 | 0.142 | 2.212 | 0.207 | 0.028 |
| AA | 6.934 | 0.246 | 3.850 | <0.001 | |
|
| |||||
| TT | Reference | ||||
| TA | 0.023 | 0.146 | 2.069 | 0.050 | 0.04 |
| AA | 0.039 | 0.228 | 3.25 | 0.001 | |
|
| |||||
| TT | Reference | ||||
| TA | 1.584 | 0.168 | 2.488 | 0.124 | 0.014 |
| AA | 2.934 | 0.289 | 4.292 | <0.001 | |
|
| |||||
| TT | Reference | ||||
| TA | 2.290 | 0.149 | 2.244 | 0.181 | 0.026 |
| AA | 5.100 | 0.310 | 4.693 | <0.001 | |
|
| |||||
| TT | Reference | ||||
| TA | 3.377 | 0.157 | 2.287 | 0.126 | 0.023 |
| AA | 6.178 | 0.268 | 3.931 | <0.001 | |
|
| |||||
| TT | Reference | ||||
| TA | 2.027 | 0.131 | 1.950 | 0.133 | NS |
| AA | 5.367 | 0.322 | 4.809 | <0.001 | |
|
| |||||
| TT | Reference | ||||
| TA | 0.516 | 0.169 | 2.494 | 0.124 | 0.013 |
| AA | 1.010 | 0.308 | 4.580 | <0.001 | |
|
| |||||
| TT | Reference | ||||
| TA | 3.777 | 0.023 | 0.324 | 0.062 | NS |
| AA | 42.629 | 0.237 | 3.406 | 0.001 | |
|
| |||||
| TT | Reference | ||||
| TA | 0.703 | 0.027 | 0.388 | 0.093 | NS |
| AA | −6.912 | −0.243 | −3.556 | <0.001 | |
They have only been calculated for the variables that showed significant differences in means during the bivariate analysis. Models Adjusted by age, sex and physical development according to Tanner stage. WC: Waist circumference; WHtR: Waist-to-Height Ratio; BMI: Body Mass Index; BF%: Body Fat Percentage; HOMA-IR: Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance; TG: Triglycerides; HDL-C: High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol; NS: Non-significative.
Figure 1(a) Systolic Blood Pressure average according to Metabolic Syndrome and Genotype (b) Diastolic Blood Pressure average according to Metabolic Syndrome and Genotype (c) Waist Blood Pressure average according to Metabolic Syndrome and Genotype (d) Triglycerides average according to Metabolic Syndrome and Genotype (e) HDL-Cholesterol average according to Metabolic Syndrome and Genotype (f) Glucose average according to Metabolic Syndrome and Genotype (g) Insulin average according to Metabolic Syndrome and Genotype. The upper limit of each box corresponds to the third quartile value (75% of the data) and the lower limit to the first quartile (25%). The line into the box represents the median. Two vertical bars (whiskers) are included. The length of the vertical bars (whiskers) is determined by these values: Q1 − [1.5 × the interquartile range] for the lower one and Q3 + [1.5 × the interquartile range] for the upper one. Symbols represent outliers and extreme values (distances exceeding those defined for whiskers). (p): indicates the p-value of the difference in means (ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis) between the different genotypes and for each group according to whether or not metabolic syndrome is present. (p *): indicates the p-value of the association between the different genotypes and the presence or absence of metabolic syndrome.