| Literature DB >> 30271660 |
Szkup Małgorzata1, Brodowski Jacek2, Owczarek Aleksander Jerzy3, Choręza Piotr3, Jurczak Anna4, Grochans Elżbieta1.
Abstract
Metabolic syndrome is an increasing health problem, whose pathogenesis may be associated with genetic factors. The main purpose of our study was to assess relationships between MetS and the presence of the FTO rs9939609, the MC4R rs17782313, and the PPAR-γ rs1801282 polymorphisms in 45-60-year-old women. The study included patients from the general population of the Westpomeranian Province (Poland). The mean age was 54.3 ± 4.2 years. The research procedure involved taking structured history, physical examination, anthropometric measurements, and collecting blood for biochemical and genetic analysis. The patients who met the diagnostic criteria for MetS constituted 38.35% of all participants (sample size: 425 patients). The comparison of blood biochemical parameters revealed numerous differences between the women with MetS and those from the control group. Genetic analysis demonstrated that the T allele of the FTO gene was a factor substantially decreasing the incidence of MetS in the study sample (ORT vs. A = 0.734; 95% CI: 0.555 - 0.970; p < 0.05). Other polymorphisms were not directly related to MetS incidence.Entities:
Keywords: Fat Mass and Obesity Associated (FTO) Protein; Melanocortin Melanocortin 4 Receptor; Metabolic Syndrome X; Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor gamma
Year: 2018 PMID: 30271660 PMCID: PMC6147583 DOI: 10.14336/AD.2017.1027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aging Dis ISSN: 2152-5250 Impact factor: 6.745
Characteristics of the biochemical and anthropometric parameters of the women with regard to the normal ranges.
| Reference range | Below the norm | The norm | Above the norm [n (%)] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.6 — 24.9 uIU/ml | 3 (0.71%) | 399 (93.88%) | 23 (5.41%) | |
| 115 — 190 mg/dl | 1 (0.23%) | 105 (24.71%) | 319 (75.06%) | |
| > 50 mg/dl | 110 (25.94%) | 314 (74.06%) | ||
| < 115 mg/dl | 135 (31.76%) | 290 (68.24%) | ||
| < 150 mg/dl | 332 (78.12%) | 93 (21.88%) | ||
| < 145 mg/dl | 177 (41.65%) | 248 (58.35%) | ||
| 60 — 99 mg/dl | 321 (75.53%) | 104 (24.47%) | ||
| 0.0 — 5.0 mg/l | 378 (88.94%) | 47 (11.06%) | ||
| ≤ 2.5 [ | 269 (63.29%) | 156 (36.71%) | ||
| ≤ 130 mmHg | 199 (46.82%) | 226 (53.18%) | ||
| ≤ 85 mmHg | 298 (70.12%) | 127 (29.88%) | ||
| ≤ 80 cm [ | 115 (27.06%) | 310 (72.94%) | ||
| 2 (0.47%) | 135 (31.91%) | 162 (38.30%) | 126 (29.79%) | |
| 79 (18.59%) | (346) 81.41% | |||
n — number of case
Comparative analysis of particular biochemical and anthropometric parameters, and blood pressure in the women with regard to MetS.
| MetS (+) (n = 162) | MetS (-) (n = 263) | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12.89 (9.26 — 17.20) | 8.70 (6.30 — 10.30) | < 0.001 | |
| 101.0 (90.0 — 117.0) | 84.0 (78.0 — 91.0) | < 0.001 | |
| 4.741 (2.240 — 4.447) | 1.790 (1.260 — 2.334) | < 0.001 | |
| 219.0 ± 52.3 | 218.1 ± 36.7 | 0.858 | |
| 133.4 ± 46.6 | 132.1 ± 34.4 | 0.761 | |
| 55.3 ± 16.7 | 67.8 ± 15.4 | < 0.001 | |
| 147.0 (103.0 — 194.0) | 84.0 (67.0 — 109.0) | < 0.001 | |
| 164.2 ± 51.4 | 150.3 ± 37.5 | < 0.01 | |
| 1.5 (1.1 - 2.8) | 2.4 (1.3 - 3.8) | < 0.001 | |
| 77.5 ± 13.0 | 71.0 ± 13.0 | < 0.001 | |
| 28.93 (25.80 — 33.20) | 25.80 (23.40 — 29.00) | < 0.001 | |
| 103.9 (98.6 — 109.0) | 100.4 (96.0 — 105.9) | < 0.001 | |
| 91.4 ± 10.7 | 85.5 ± 10.0 | < 0.001 | |
| 0.872 ± 0.073 | 0.841 ± 0.073 | < 0.001 | |
| s | 135.5 ± 14.6 | 122.2 ± 14.3 | < 0.001 |
| 81.8 ± 9.6 | 76.9 ± 10.3 | < 0.001 |
n — number of cases; mean ± standard deviation; median (lower quartile - upper quartile); p — significance level
Comparative analysis of particular elements of the women’s health functioning with regard to MetS.
| MetS (+) (n = 162) | MetS (-) (n = 263) | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18 (11.11%) | 52 (19.77%) | < 0.05 | |
| 32 (19.75%) | 52 (19.77%) | 0.870 | |
| 16 (9.88%) | 2 (0.76%) | < 0.001 | |
| 49 (30.25%) | 7 (2.66%) | < 0.001 | |
| 51 (31.48%) | 10 (3.80%) | < 0.001 |
n — number of cases; p — significance level
Analysis of the distribution of the FTO rs9939609, the MC4R rs17782313, and the PPAR-γ rs1801282 polymorphisms with regard to MetS.
| FTO genotype | FTO allele | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A/A | A/T | T/T | A allele | T allele | |
| 41 (25.31%) | 72 (44.44%) | 49 (30.25%) | 154 (42.3%) | 170 (35.0%) | |
| 42 (15.97%) | 126 (47.91%) | 95 (36.12%) | 210 (57.7%) | 316 (65.0%) | |
| ∑ | 83 (19.53%) | 198 (46.59%) | 144 (33.88%) | ||
| p = 0.056 | p < 0.05 | ||||
| 2 (1.23%) | 58 (35.80%) | 102 (60.69%) | 62 (38.5%) | 262 (38.0%) | |
| 8 (3.04%) | 83 (31.56%) | 172 (65.40%) | 99 (61.5%) | 427 (62.0%) | |
| ∑ | 10 (2.35%) | 141 (33.18%) | 274 (64.47%) | ||
| p = 0.363 | p = 0.909 | ||||
| 107 (66.05%) | 47 (29.01%) | 8 (4.94%) | 261 (37.7%) | 63 (40.9%) | |
| 186 (71.26%) | 59 (22.61%) | 16 (6.13%) | 431 (62.3%) | 91 (59.1%) | |
| ∑ | 293 (69.27%) | 106 (25.06%) | 24 (5.67%) | ||
| p = 0.320 | p = 0.461 | ||||
n — number of cases; ∑ — sum of cases; p — significance level
Odds ratios (OR) for the relationships between MetS and the FTO rs9939609, the MC4R rs17782313, and the PPAR-γ rs1801282 SNPs calculated assuming different models of inheritance
| Model | Genotype | MetS (+) | MetS (-) | OR (95% CI) | p-value | BIC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Association between | |||||||
| C/C | 107 (66.0%) | 186 (71.3%) | 1.00 | 0.32 | 578.9 | ||
| C/G | 47 (29.0%) | 59 (22.6%) | 1.38 (0.88 - 2.17) | ||||
| G/G | 8 (4.9%) | 16 (6.1%) | 0.87 (0.36 - 2.10) | ||||
| C/C | 107 (66.0%) | 186 (71.3%) | 1.00 | 0.26 | 573.8 | ||
| C/G-G/G | 55 (34.0%) | 75 (28.7%) | 1.27 (0.84 - 1.94) | ||||
| C/C-C/G | 154 (95.1%) | 245 (93.9%) | 1.00 | 0.60 | 574.8 | ||
| G/G | 8 (4.9%) | 16 (6.1%) | 0.80 (0.33 - 1.90) | ||||
| C/C-G/G | 115 (71.0%) | 202 (77.4%) | 1.00 | 0.14 | 572.9 | ||
| C/G | 47 (29.0%) | 59 (22.6%) | 1.40 (0.90 - 2.19) | ||||
| Association between | |||||||
| T/T-A/T | 49 (30.2%) | 95 (36.1%) | 1.00 | 0.06 | 577.4 | ||
| A/T | 72 (44.4%) | 126 (47.9%) | 1.11 (0.71-1.74) | ||||
| A/A | 41 (25.3%) | 42 (16%) | 1.89 (1.09-3.28) | ||||
| T/T | 49 (30.2%) | 95 (36.1%) | 1.00 | 0.21 | 575.5 | ||
| A/T-A/A | 113 (69.8%) | 168 (63.9%) | 1.30 (0.86-1.98) | ||||
| T/T-A/T | 121 (74.7%) | 221 (84%) | 1.00 | < 0.05 | 571.6 | ||
| A/A | 41 (25.3%) | 42 (16%) | 1.78 (1.10-2.89) | ||||
| T/T-A/A | 90 (55.6%) | 137 (52.1%) | 1.00 | 0.49 | 576.6 | ||
| A/T | 72 (44.4%) | 126 (47.9%) | 0.87 (0.59-1.29) | ||||
| Association between | |||||||
| T/T | 102 (63%) | 172 (65.4%) | 1.00 | 0.34 | 580.9 | ||
| C/T | 58 (35.8%) | 83 (31.6%) | 1.18 (0.78-1.79) | ||||
| C/C | 2 (1.2%) | 8 (3%) | 0.42 (0.09-2.02) | ||||
| T/T | 102 (63%) | 172 (65.4%) | 1.00 | 0.61 | 576.8 | ||
| C/T-C/C | 60 (37%) | 91 (34.6%) | 1.11 (0.74-1.67) | ||||
| T/T-C/T | 160 (98.8%) | 255 (97%) | 1.00 | 0.21 | 575.5 | ||
| C/C | 2 (1.2%) | 8 (3%) | 0.40 (0.08-1.90) | ||||
| T/T-C/C | 104 (64.2%) | 180 (68.4%) | 1.00 | 0.37 | 576.2 | ||
| C/T | 58 (35.8%) | 83 (31.6%) | 1.21 (0.80-1.83) | ||||