Anatoly Zhitkovich1. 1. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Brown University, 70 Ship Street, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, United States.
Abstract
Vitamin C (ascorbic acid) is a water-soluble antioxidant and a cofactor for a large number of enzymes. It is present in all tissues and especially abundant in corneal epithelium, stem cells, and neurons. Although similar to thiols in its ability to react with many reactive oxygen species (ROS), ascorbate is much better (>100× faster) than glutathione at scavenging of primary ROS (superoxide radical and singlet oxygen). Ascorbate appears to be especially important for elimination of O2•- in the nucleus which contains little or no SOD activity. Cofactor functions of ascorbate involve the maintenance of activity of Fe(II)/2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases via reduction of Fe(III). The most prominent activity of ascorbate-dependent dioxygenases in the cytoplasm is hydroxylation of prolines in proteins involved in the formation of extracellular matrix and regulation of metabolism and hypoxia responses. In the nucleus, ascorbate is important for oxidative demethylation of 5-methylcytosine in DNA (by TET proteins) and removal of methyl groups from histone lysines (by JmjC demethylases). Differentiation and other cellular reprograming processes involving DNA demethylation are especially sensitive to ascorbate insufficiency. High doses of vitamin C alone or in combinations with drugs produced cancer-suppressive effects which involved redox, immune, and epigenetic mechanisms. Solutions to vitamin C deficiency in cultured cells are discussed to improve the physiological relevance of in vitro models. An abundance of vitamin C in rodents limits their ability to fully recapitulate human sensitivity to adverse health effects of malnutrition and xenobiotics, including neurotoxicity, lung injury, and intergenerational and other epigenetic effects.
Vitamin C (ascorbic acid) is a water-soluble antioxidant and a cofactor for a large number of enzymes. It is present in all tissues and especially abundant in corneal epithelium, stem cells, and neurons. Although similar to thiols in its ability to react with many reactive oxygen species (ROS), ascorbate is much better (>100× faster) than glutathione at scavenging of primary ROS (superoxide radical and singlet oxygen). Ascorbate appears to be especially important for elimination of O2•- in the nucleus which contains little or no SOD activity. Cofactor functions of ascorbate involve the maintenance of activity of Fe(II)/2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases via reduction of Fe(III). The most prominent activity of ascorbate-dependent dioxygenases in the cytoplasm is hydroxylation of prolines in proteins involved in the formation of extracellular matrix and regulation of metabolism and hypoxia responses. In the nucleus, ascorbate is important for oxidative demethylation of 5-methylcytosine in DNA (by TET proteins) and removal of methyl groups from histone lysines (by JmjC demethylases). Differentiation and other cellular reprograming processes involving DNA demethylation are especially sensitive to ascorbateinsufficiency. High doses of vitamin C alone or in combinations with drugs produced cancer-suppressive effects which involved redox, immune, and epigenetic mechanisms. Solutions to vitamin C deficiency in cultured cells are discussed to improve the physiological relevance of in vitro models. An abundance of vitamin C in rodents limits their ability to fully recapitulate human sensitivity to adverse health effects of malnutrition and xenobiotics, including neurotoxicity, lung injury, and intergenerational and other epigenetic effects.
Vitamin C is an essential micronutrient
to humans and other primates caused by loss-of-function mutations
in l-gulono-1.4-lactone oxidase (encoded by GULO gene) which catalyzes the final step in ascorbic acid biosynthesis
from glucose. The majority of eukaryotes synthesize ascorbic acid
and yeast, producing a related compound erythro-ascorbic acid. Vitamin
C is found in the diet and in vivo in its reduced
(ascorbic acid) or oxidized (dehydroascorbic acid) forms (Figure A). Due to its low
pKa = 4.2 at the C3 hydroxyl, ascorbic
acid is present almost completely (>99%) as ascorbate anion at
physiological
pH. Severe vitamin C deficiency in humans leads to scurvy, which is
a fatal disease that can be cured only by a restored intake of vitamin
C.[1] Several overt clinical manifestations
of scurvy (reopening of old wounds, bleeding, loss of teeth, gums,
and skin abnormalities) are clearly linked to the long-established
role of ascorbate in the production of mature collagen. Other symptoms
and high-fatality rates were more difficult to explain by defects
in collagen formation, pointing to a broader set of essential activities
of ascorbate. Although the occurrence of scurvy is rare in the modern
world, the incidence of a significant vitamin C deficiency is still
common even in the wealthy countries.[2−4] A recent popularity of
animal product-based (ketogenic and similar) diets can potentially
increase the incidence or extent of vitamin C insufficiency. Vitamin
C deficiency is at least partially responsible for intergenerational
epigenetic effects produced by a nutritional deprivation during pregnancy.[5] The main physiological functions of ascorbate
include its activities as an antioxidant and a critical cofactor for
a growing number of enzymes that are directly or indirectly involved
in multiple cellular activities. Resurgence of research interest in
vitamin C is further fueled by recent discoveries of its importance
in the main biochemical processes regulating epigenetics and its emerging
promise in cancer treatment. These new findings indicate that the
role of ascorbate in modulation of cellular responses to toxicants,
drugs, and other stressors extends beyond its antioxidant activities.
Figure 1
Chemical
forms and cellular metabolism of vitamin C. (A) Structures
of the main forms of vitamin C. At physiological pH, reduced vitamin
C predominantly exists as ascorbate anion due to its low pKa = 4.2. (B) Cellular uptake of reduced (ascorbate,
Asc) and oxidized (dehydroascorbic acid, DHA) forms of vitamin C.
Extracellular concentrations of dehydroascorbic acid and, consequently,
the importance of its uptake are higher for cells that release large
amounts of oxidants during the inflammatory responses (neutrophils,
for example). Extracellular reduction of Fe(III) by ascorbate is another
source of oxidized vitamin C which enters cells through GLUT glucose
transporters. Fe(II) is taken up by cells via the divalent metal transporter
DMT1.
Chemical
forms and cellular metabolism of vitamin C. (A) Structures
of the main forms of vitamin C. At physiological pH, reduced vitamin
C predominantly exists as ascorbate anion due to its low pKa = 4.2. (B) Cellular uptake of reduced (ascorbate,
Asc) and oxidized (dehydroascorbic acid, DHA) forms of vitamin C.
Extracellular concentrations of dehydroascorbic acid and, consequently,
the importance of its uptake are higher for cells that release large
amounts of oxidants during the inflammatory responses (neutrophils,
for example). Extracellular reduction of Fe(III) by ascorbate is another
source of oxidized vitamin C which enters cells through GLUTglucose
transporters. Fe(II) is taken up by cells via the divalent metal transporter
DMT1.
Vitamin C Uptake and Concentrations In Vivo
Ascorbate enters cells through sodium-dependent
vitamin C transporters
(SVCT) 1 and 2.[6−8] SVCT1 (SLC23A1) is important for ascorbate absorption
in the intestine and, especially, for reabsorption in the kidney.
A more ubiquitously expressed SVCT2 (SLC23A2) is responsible for ascorbate
uptake by cells in a majority of tissues. Consistent with its major
physiological importance, SVCT2 knockout mice die almost immediately
after birth.[9] Dehydroascorbic acid structurally
resembles glucose and enters cells via GLUT transporters, which is
followed by its rapid reduction to ascorbate (Figure B). Human plasma contains on average approximately
50 μM vitamin C, which predominantly comprises ascorbate. Cellular
concentrations of ascorbate are much higher and range from 1 to 5
mM for most tissues, but they reach 10 mM and higher in neurons, adrenal
glands, and corneal epithelium.[10,11] Ascorbate is the most
dramatically elevated metabolite in human and mouse hematopoietic
stem cells (up to 18×) in comparison to their more differentiated
progeny.[12] Based on the established role
of ascorbate in stem cells (discussed below), it is possible that
many other if not all stem cells in vivo contain
much higher ascorbate levels than the bulk of any tissue containing
differentiated cells. Although plasma concentrations of dehydroascorbic
are low (1–2 μM), human erythrocytes (cells lacking SVCT1/2
proteins) are very efficient at its uptake through the GLUT1 transporter
and are able to accumulate plasma-level concentrations of vitamin
C, which are proposed to constitute its physiological reservoir in
humans.[13] Ascorbate export mechanisms of
from cells are currently unknown. High levels of ascorbate in tissues
(20–200× over plasma concentration) are also frequently
viewed as a systemic reservoir of vitamin C in humans. The postulated
reservoir role is probably not the primary biological reason for high
ascorbate in human tissues, as equally high tissue concentrations
of ascorbate are also present in mice and rats that continuously produce
copious amounts of vitamin C (∼100× over recommended intake
in humans). There is now clear experimental evidence that very high
ascorbate concentrations are in fact necessary for the normal functions
of some cells (stem cells, for example). Although a scurvy-level vitamin
C deficiency is currently rare, significantly lower ascorbate levels
are frequently found among cancerpatients, which in experimental
models promoted cancer aggressiveness and limited responses to several
chemotherapeutics.
Antioxidant Activities in Cells
Ascorbate is generally known as a water-soluble antioxidant. However,
the importance of its specific protective activities and the overall
role as the radical scavenger and antioxidant are not well covered
or even completely ignored in some otherwise comprehensive reviews
of cellular antioxidant defenses. Among small antioxidants, glutathione
typically receives a lot of attention, although, as discussed below,
it is clearly an inferior direct scavenger of the primary cellular
oxidants in comparison to ascorbate. Underappreciation of ascorbate
could be related to its (near) absence in cultured cells, which are
the most commonly used biological models in studies of oxidative stress.
In ascorbate-devoid cells, glutathione certainly takes on the role
of the key small antioxidant in the direct detoxification of reactive
oxygen species (ROS). A large portion of cellular damage by ROS frequently
results from the reactive products of lipid oxidation, such as acrolein,
crotonaldehyde, and 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal. Glutathione and other small
thiols protect against toxicity of aldehydes, especially the most
toxic group of α,β-unsaturated aldehydes, through the
formation of inactive conjugates.[14-16] This property is not
shared by ascorbate which acts as a reducer (electron donor) and does
not form covalent bonds with reactive carbonyls. However, as discussed
below, ascorbate is much more effective than glutathione in the elimination
of primary ROS.Ascorbate is a broad spectrum antioxidant as
it can react with
a range of organic radicals and ROS. One-electron reduction of ROS
and other radicals by ascorbate results in the formation of the resonance-stabilized
ascorbate radical, which is completely unreactive with other biomolecules
and is primarily lost via disproportionation reaction with another
ascorbate radical, yielding ascorbate and dehydroascorbic acid.[17] A broad radical/ROS reactivity is not unique
to ascorbate, as it is also found among thiols including glutathione
which is present in cells at comparable concentrations to those of
ascorbate. For example, both glutathione and ascorbate are very effective
at removal of a highly toxic hydroxyl radical (•OH). The reactivity of ascorbate and glutathione with the most abundant
cellular ROS, H2O2, is very limited (rate constants
2 × 10 M–1 s–1 and 0.9 M–1 s–1, respectively)[18] and unlikely to be physiologically significant. The importance
of glutathione in suppression of H2O2toxicity
stems from its role as a cofactor for glutathione peroxidases (GPXs),
especially a very effective cytoplasmic enzyme GPX1 which is present
in cells at an ∼1 μM concentration and has the rate constant
of 2 × 107 M–1 s–1 for H2O2.[123] Multiplication
of rate constants by cellular concentrations of GPX1 and ascorbate in vivo (5 mM) gives rates of H2O2 elimination equal to 20 s–1 and 0.01 s–1, respectively. Thus, the enzymatic activity of GPX1 is expected
to be 2000× more effective at detoxification of H2O2 in comparison to ascorbate and even higher relative
to the non-enzymatic removal with glutathione. Catalase and peroxiredoxin-1
(PRDX1) represent other abundant and very effective enzymatic systems
for elimination of H2O2 by converting it into
H2O, further indicating that H2O2 detoxification in cells is principally based on the biological mechanisms
and likely includes minimal contributions from direct chemical reactions
with small antioxidants. Although ascorbate is a highly hydrophilic
molecule, it also suppresses oxidation of lipids by reducing the tocopheroxyl
radical and thereby maintaining the levels of the main lipid-soluble
antioxidant, vitamin E.[19,20] Consistent with this
role, addition of physiological levels of ascorbate inhibited lipidperoxide-dependent cell death (ferroptosis) in cultured cells.[21] Glutathione is probably even more important
for prevention of ferroptosis due to its role as a cofactor for the
main lipidperoxide-eliminating enzyme GPX4.[22] Thus, both ascorbate and glutathione suppress lipid peroxidation
and ferroptosis but through mechanistically distinct mechanisms.The main difference in the direct scavenging of the main ROS between
ascorbate and glutathione (small thiols in general) is found in their
reactivity with the superoxide anion radical (O2•–), which is >100× higher for ascorbate than for glutathione.
Rate constant for ascorbate is 2.9 × 105 M–1 s–1 (mean of two studies),[23,24] and the highest reported rate constant for glutathione is 1.1 ×
103 M–1 s–1.[25] Other estimates of rate constant for glutathione
are much lower.[15,18] O2•– is the primary cellular ROS arising during the respiratory metabolism
in mitochondria, physiological enzymatic activities (NADPH oxidases,
xanthine oxidase) and redox cycling of various drugs and toxicants.[15,18] Dismutation of O2•– by the cellular
enzymes SOD1/2 produces hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), whereas the reaction of O2•– with a weak oxidant nitric oxide (•NO) yields
a secondary oxidant peroxynitrite (ONOO–). H2O2 and ONOO– can subsequently
serve as sources of tertiary oxidants, including a very reactive OH• radical (Figure ). Considering its abundance (10 μM or more)[26] and a very high activity of cytoplasmic SOD1
in the removal of O2•– (k = 2 × 109 M–1 s–1),[27] it is important to
ask whether ascorbate can make a meaningful contribution to the elimination
of this primary ROS. Using cellular concentrations and rate constants
for calculations of their reaction rates (SOD1: 10 μM ×
2 × 109 M–1 s–1 = 2 × 104 s–1; ascorbate: 5 mM
× 2.9 × 105 M–1 s–1 = 1.5 × 103 s–1), SOD1 appears
to be 13.3× more effective in the elimination of O2•– than ascorbate. This difference translates
into a 7% contribution of ascorbate to the removal of cytoplasmic
superoxide. In cells with its particularly high concentrations (stem
cells, neurons, corneal epithelium), ascorbate should make a larger
impact on scavenging O2•– and
more significantly complement SOD1 activity. Although its superoxide-scavenging
activity diminishes the formation of peroxynitrite, ascorbate is known
to accelerate a release of •NO from S-nitrosoglutathione, which is a major physiological carrier of nitric
oxide. Use of specific metal chelators in cell culture found a dependence
of this activity on the availability of redox-active Cu.[28] Since cellular concentrations of free Cu ions
are tightly controlled, ascorbate-promoted decomposition of S-nitrosoglutathione appears to occur more likely outside
the cells.
Figure 2
Main cellular ROS and antioxidant mechanisms. Superoxide anion
radical (O2•–) is the primary
ROS produced by various physiological and pathophysiological processes.
Reduction of O2•– by SODs or ascorbate
(Asc) produces a less reactive but more diffusible H2O2 which is detoxified by catalase, peroxiredoxin 1 (PRDX1),
and glutathione peroxidase 1 (GPX1). Reaction of H2O2 with free Fe(II) and less frequently Cu(I) yields a highly
damaging •OH radical. Hydroxyl and other reactive
radicals are also formed during the decomposition of peroxynitrite
generated in the reaction of nitric oxide radical (•NO) with O2•–. In comparison
with the biological processes, ascorbate makes no significant contribution
to the detoxification of H2O2 and plays a minor
role in the removal of cytoplasmic O2•– in the majority of cells. Secondary radicals (tertiary ROS) arising
from H2O2 and ONOO– lack specialized
enzymatic defenses and are primarily detoxified by small antioxidants
such as ascorbate and small thiols (glutathione). Cells also lack
enzymatic processes for removal of singlet oxygen (1O2) which is effectively eliminated by ascorbate via a two-electron
reduction to H2O2. In contrast to the cytoplasm,
the nucleus has a minimal or no SOD activity, which elevates the importance
of ascorbate in scavenging superoxide in this cellular compartment.
Main cellular ROS and antioxidant mechanisms. Superoxide anion
radical (O2•–) is the primary
ROS produced by various physiological and pathophysiological processes.
Reduction of O2•– by SODs or ascorbate
(Asc) produces a less reactive but more diffusible H2O2 which is detoxified by catalase, peroxiredoxin 1 (PRDX1),
and glutathione peroxidase 1 (GPX1). Reaction of H2O2 with free Fe(II) and less frequently Cu(I) yields a highly
damaging •OH radical. Hydroxyl and other reactive
radicals are also formed during the decomposition of peroxynitrite
generated in the reaction of nitric oxide radical (•NO) with O2•–. In comparison
with the biological processes, ascorbate makes no significant contribution
to the detoxification of H2O2 and plays a minor
role in the removal of cytoplasmic O2•– in the majority of cells. Secondary radicals (tertiary ROS) arising
from H2O2 and ONOO– lack specialized
enzymatic defenses and are primarily detoxified by small antioxidants
such as ascorbate and small thiols (glutathione). Cells also lack
enzymatic processes for removal of singlet oxygen (1O2) which is effectively eliminated by ascorbate via a two-electron
reduction to H2O2. In contrast to the cytoplasm,
the nucleus has a minimal or no SOD activity, which elevates the importance
of ascorbate in scavenging superoxide in this cellular compartment.In contrast to H2O2 and O2•–, tertiary ROS (•OH, •CO3–, and •NO2 radicals) (Figure ) lack enzymatic defenses and are primarily
eliminated
in direct reactions with ascorbate and small thiols. Ascorbate is
expected to be more important than glutathione in detoxification of
nitrogen dioxide and carbonyl radicals. Both •CO3– and •NO2 preferentially
react with the thiolate anion (RS–),[29] which constitutes only a small fraction (5%)
of the total glutathione at physiological pH. The predominance of
the RSH form is advantageous for the reaction of glutathione with •OH, which proceeds through hydrogen abstraction.[15] The rate constants for the reactions of •OH with glutathione (1.6 × 1010 M–1 s–1) and ascorbate (4.5 ×
109 M–1 s–1)[30] are very high and only moderately different,
indicating that the relative contributions of these antioxidants to
the detoxification of hydroxyl radical are largely a function of their
cellular concentrations.Another primary cellular oxidant that
is effectively removed by
ascorbate is singlet oxygen (1O2), which is
an electronically excited state of O2. Although it is not
a radical, 1O2 is a strong oxidant and mutagen.
Singlet oxygen is produced in photoreactions of UV and visible light
with biomolecules and released by certain enzymatic reactions (lipid
peroxidases, for example).[31] Cells lack
specialized enzymes for detoxification of singlet oxygen and rely
on small antioxidants for protection against this oxidant. The rate
constant for reaction of ascorbate with 1O2 is
very high (k = 3 × 108 M–1 s–1)[32] and comparable
to those of specialized enzymes detoxifying superoxide or hydrogenperoxide. Unlike reactions with other ROS, ascorbate acts as a two-electron
donor in the elimination of singlet oxygen:Scavenging
of 1O2 by glutathione is also
relatively fast (k = 2.4 × 106 M–1 s–1)[33] but still approximately 100× slower than that by ascorbate.
The singlet oxygen-reactive form of glutathione is the thiolate anion
which is present as a minor fraction at physiological pH (pKa = 8.7 for glutathione). Thus, ascorbate is
clearly a dominant small molecule scavenger of 1O2. A biological support for its importance in detoxification of 1O2 is the presence of high concentrations of ascorbate
in humancorneal epithelial cells (∼8 mM)[34] which are continuously exposed to UV and visible light
and, therefore, experience an extensive formation of singlet oxygen.
Consistent with this interpretation, nocturnal animals have significantly
lower ascorbate levels in their corneal epithelium in comparison to
diurnal species. Protective effects of corneal ascorbate against UV-induced
DNA damage have been confirmed in vivo.[35,36] Another example where ascorbate reacts with a potent toxicant via
two-electron transfer is reduction of carcinogenic chromium(VI).[37] Reaction of Cr(VI) with ascorbate yields non-oxidizing
Cr(IV). If Cr(VI) reacts with thiols, reduction proceeds through an
one-electron transfer, and the resulting product, Cr(V), is a strong
oxidant causing DNA breakage[38] and phosphorylation
of the transcription factor p53 by the oxidant-sensitive kinase ATM.[39]Radical-scavenging activities of antioxidants
are recognized as
being important for all physiological functions of cells, including
preservation of genome stability. The main ROS-detoxifying enzymes
exhibit a clear intracellular compartmentalization. SOD1, PRDX1, and
GPX1 are primarily cytoplasmic, SOD2 is a mitochondrial enzyme, and
catalase resides in peroxisomes. The nucleus is the second largest
compartment in the majority of cells, and it does not appear to contain
significant levels of these antioxidant enzymes under normal conditions.
A severe oxidative stress can cause a nuclear translocation of SOD1,
which is linked to the regulation of transcription of the antioxidant
genes.[40] The paucity of enzymatic defenses
makes the nucleus more dependent on the anti-ROS activity of small
antioxidants. Nuclear concentrations of ascorbate have not been specifically
established yet, but they are expected to be similar to those in cytoplasm
since nuclear pores allow a free diffusion of molecules with molecular
weight <1000 Da. The molecular weight of the ascorbate anion (175.1)
is much smaller than this threshold, which should promote a near equilibrium
between nuclear and cytoplasmic pools. Immunomicroscopy-based measurements
in human cultured cells found that nuclear ascorbate levels were higher
than those in the cytoplasm.[41] However,
it is unclear whether the employed aldehyde fixation for immunomicroscopy
can be effective for retention and detection of the small molecule
ascorbate. In the (near) absence of SODs, ascorbate is expected to
play a dominant role in the removal of superoxide inside the nucleus.
The apparent exclusion of SOD1 from the nucleus could be linked to
the avoidance of the deleterious genotoxic effects of this enzyme
which causes strand breaks when it comes in contact with DNA.[42,43] Similar to cytoplasm, ascorbate should also act as a main reducer
of mutagenic singlet oxygen. H2O2, the product
of 1O2 and O2•– reduction by ascorbate, is less reactive and more diffusible and
can be enzymatically eliminated upon its entry into the cytoplasm.
The effectiveness of ascorbate in the removal of nuclear O2•– can be judged from the extent of the
nuclear oxidant-sensitive signaling. The redox-active drug bleomycin
causes DNA breaks and releases superoxide, causing activation of the
nuclear kinase ATM via DNA damage-dependent and direct oxidation-mediated
mechanisms, respectively. Physiological concentrations of ascorbate
produced a strong suppression of the direct oxidation-mediated activation
of ATM and phosphorylation of its nucleoplasmic target CHK2.[44] These observations experimentally support the
notion that ascorbate plays a major role in detoxification of O2•– in the nucleus. Stem cells contain
much higher concentrations of ascorbate in comparison to their differentiated
progeny,[12] which was linked to the need
for the cofactor activity of ascorbate in DNA demethylation activity
and epigenetic reprogramming of gene expression in stem cells. It
is unclear why reduction of Fe(III) to Fe(II) in DNA demethylases
(TET proteins) would require >10× higher ascorbate concentrations
than in other members of the Fe(II)/2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases.
Another possibility is that high ascorbate concentrations are not
needed as much for the Fe(III) reduction in TET proteins as for the
elimination of O2•– produced during
aborted catalytic cycles, which otherwise can inactivate the enzyme.
The active intermediate in TET enzymes is Fe(II)-O2 which,
if not used catalytically, will form Fe(III)-O2•– with a potential to produce damage locally or upon the release of
O2•–. A similar mechanism is responsible
for the release of superoxide and self-inactivation of bleomycin by
its Fe(II)-bound O2, which occurs in the absence of the
external substrate.[44,45] The uncoupling between oxygen
activation and substrate oxidation occurs with a relatively high frequency
in Fe(II)-dependent microsomal CYP450 monooxygenases. These enzymes
release superoxide as a result of the decay of the initial Fe(II)-O2 oxycomplex.[46] For many substrates,
the coupling efficiencies are below 10%, indicating that a large fraction
of Fe-activated oxygen in CYP450s is released as ROS.[15] The uncoupling frequency in oxidative demethylation of
DNA by TET proteins is currently unknown.
Cofactor for Cytoplasmic
Enzymes
Ascorbate is a soluble cofactor for more than 60
cellular enzymes,
which is indicative of its broad impact on physiological processes
and consistent with multiple clinical symptoms in scurvy and developmental
abnormalities arising as a result of maternal vitamin C deficiency
during pregnancy. The main class of enzymes engaging ascorbate as
the unbound cofactor are Fe(II)/2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases.
2-Oxoglutarate acts a cosubstrate and Fe(II) as the O2-binding
cofactor. The catalytic reaction of these enzymes involves a transfer
of one oxygen atom from Fe(II)-bound O2 onto the substrate
and production of a hydroxylation product. The other oxygen atom is
transferred to 2-oxoglutarate causing its decarboxylation and release
of succinate and CO2 (Figure A). At the end of the catalytic cycle, Fe(II)
is oxidized to Fe(III) which is unable to bind O2.[47] Collagen-modifying prolyl-4-hydroxylases are
a classic example of dioxygenases that use ascorbate to restore their
enzymatic activity by reducing Fe(III) to Fe(II). Hydroxylation of
prolyl residues is essential for the correct folding of collagen fibers
and the resulting formation of stable extracellular matrices.[48] In scurvy, the loss of mature collagen fibers
is responsible for opening of old wounds, skin deformities, bleedings,
and loss of teeth. Although scurvy is uncommon in modern societies,
significantly depleted levels of vitamin C are frequently found in
cancerpatients.[16] This insufficiency can
weaken extracellular matrix and cell–cell attachment and promote
tumor invasion and metastasis.
Figure 3
Role of ascorbate in the activity of Fe(II)/2-oxoglutarate-dependent
dioxygenases. (A) General mechanism of oxidative hydroxylation by
Fe(II)/2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases. Fe(II)-bound O2 serves as a source of oxygen atoms in oxidative hydroxylation of
a substrate and the cosubstrate 2-oxoglutarate. Ascorbate (Asc) acts
as a reducer of Fe(III) to Fe(II), which restores activity of dioxygenases
after each catalytic cycle. (B) Constitutive degradation of hypoxia-inducible
transcription factors HIF-1α and HIF-2α in normoxic cells.
HIF-1α/2α are continuously produced and then immediately
targeted for degradation in normoxia via O2-dependent hydroxylation
of specific Pro residues (Pro402 and Pro564 in HIF-1α). Hydroxylated
prolines are recognized by VHL, which triggers polyubiquitination
(Ub) of both HIFs and their subsequent
proteolysis by proteasomes. Ascorbate acts a preferred reducer of
Fe(III) to Fe(II) to maintain activity of HIF-targeting prolyl hydroxylases
PHD1–3. Another hydroxylation site in HIF-1α in normoxic
conditions is Asn803, which regulates binding of the transcription
coactivators p300/CBP (not shown). Asn803 hydroxylation is mediated
by the Fe(II)/2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase FIH, whose activity
is promoted by ascorbate through reduction of Fe(III) to Fe(II). (C)
Removal of genomic 5-methylcytosine (5-mC) by a sequential oxidation
of the methyl group by TET enzymes. Ascorbate is required for reduction
of Fe(III) to Fe(II) to restore TET activity after each catalytic
cycle. BER, base excision repair; 5-hmC, 5-hydroxymethylcytosine;
5-fC, 5-formylcytosine; and 5-caC, 5-carboxycytosine. (D) Role of
ascorbate in demethylation of histone lysines. Jumanji C (JmjC) domain-containing
histone demethylases catalyzes the removal of a methyl group from
tri-, di-, and monomethylated ε-amino groups of lysine. Hydroxymethyl
group, the product of demethylase activity, is unstable and spontaneously
released in the form of formaldehyde. As with other dioxygenases,
ascorbate is involved in reduction of Fe(III) to Fe(II) to restore
activity of JmjC demethylases after each reaction cycle.
Role of ascorbate in the activity of Fe(II)/2-oxoglutarate-dependent
dioxygenases. (A) General mechanism of oxidative hydroxylation by
Fe(II)/2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases. Fe(II)-bound O2 serves as a source of oxygen atoms in oxidative hydroxylation of
a substrate and the cosubstrate2-oxoglutarate. Ascorbate (Asc) acts
as a reducer of Fe(III) to Fe(II), which restores activity of dioxygenases
after each catalytic cycle. (B) Constitutive degradation of hypoxia-inducible
transcription factors HIF-1α and HIF-2α in normoxic cells.
HIF-1α/2α are continuously produced and then immediately
targeted for degradation in normoxia via O2-dependent hydroxylation
of specific Pro residues (Pro402 and Pro564 in HIF-1α). Hydroxylated
prolines are recognized by VHL, which triggers polyubiquitination
(Ub) of both HIFs and their subsequent
proteolysis by proteasomes. Ascorbate acts a preferred reducer of
Fe(III) to Fe(II) to maintain activity of HIF-targeting prolyl hydroxylases
PHD1–3. Another hydroxylation site in HIF-1α in normoxic
conditions is Asn803, which regulates binding of the transcription
coactivators p300/CBP (not shown). Asn803 hydroxylation is mediated
by the Fe(II)/2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase FIH, whose activity
is promoted by ascorbate through reduction of Fe(III) to Fe(II). (C)
Removal of genomic 5-methylcytosine (5-mC) by a sequential oxidation
of the methyl group by TET enzymes. Ascorbate is required for reduction
of Fe(III) to Fe(II) to restore TET activity after each catalytic
cycle. BER, base excision repair; 5-hmC, 5-hydroxymethylcytosine;
5-fC, 5-formylcytosine; and 5-caC, 5-carboxycytosine. (D) Role of
ascorbate in demethylation of histone lysines. Jumanji C (JmjC) domain-containing
histone demethylases catalyzes the removal of a methyl group from
tri-, di-, and monomethylated ε-amino groups of lysine. Hydroxymethyl
group, the product of demethylase activity, is unstable and spontaneously
released in the form of formaldehyde. As with other dioxygenases,
ascorbate is involved in reduction of Fe(III) to Fe(II) to restore
activity of JmjC demethylases after each reaction cycle.Ascorbate is also involved in the control of stability of
the hypoxia-inducible
factors HIF-1α and HIF-2α via stimulation of their proline
hydroxylation by PHD1–3.[49−52] Proline-hydroxylated HIFs are recognized by the VHL-containing
E3 ubiquitin ligase which induces their polyubiquitination and a subsequent
degradation by 26S proteasomes (Figure B). Stabilization of HIF-1α/HIF-2α proteins
occurs rapidly upon a loss of O2, but it can also be induced
by divalent metal ions (Co2+, Ni2+, Mn2+) competing with Fe(II) for PHD binding, by 2-oxoglutarate analogues
and by ROS. Oxidants such as H2O2 can directly
damage functionally important Cys-SH groups in PHD1–3,[53,54] but the inhibition of HIF1/2-Pro hydroxylation activity, especially
in cell culture, can be further exacerbated by oxidant-induced depletion
of ascorbate.[50,55] The absence of Pro hydroxylation
leads to a rapid stabilization of HIF-1α/HIF-2α which
then bind their stable subunit HIF-1β leading to the nuclear
translocation of the heterodimers. A full activation of HIF-1α
also requires the loss of the FIH-mediated hydroxylation of Asn803,
which permits the recruitment of the transcription coactivators p300/CBP.[56] FIH is another Fe(II)/2-oxoglutarate-dependent
dioxygenase whose hydroxylation activity is promoted by ascorbate.[52] Activation of the transcriptional factor HIF-1
in solid tumors is known to enhance their invasiveness and metastasis.[57] This aggressive phenotype is at least in part
dependent on the ascorbatedeficiency in the tumors. For example,
an investigation of humanendometrial cancers found that high-grade
tumors had the highest HIF-1α protein levels and were ascorbate-deficient.[58] In the Gulo–/– mouse model of ascorbatedeficiency, restoration of physiological
levels of vitamin C inhibited tumor growth and HIF-1 pathway activity.[59]Gulo–/– mice that were kept on the ascorbate-deficient diet also showed
a slower formation and growth of tumors formed by the hypoxia-mimicking
carcinogen nickel.[60] A vitamin C-deficient
state in humanmalignancies stems from multiple causes such as a poor
accumulation of ascorbate by some cancers, a limited blood circulation
in solid tumors, and low systemic ascorbate levels found among many
cancerpatients.HIF1/2 are the best known, but not the only,
targets of prolyl
hydroxylases PHD1–3. A recently discovered novel substrate
of PHD2 is a serine-threonine protein kinase AKT which regulates a
metabolic branch in mitogenic signaling from growth factor receptors.
In response to growth factor stimulation, AKT is activated by phosphorylation
at Thr308 which is reversed by protein phosphatase 2A. The recruitment
of this phosphatase occurs in response to Pro hydroxylation of AKT
by PHD2.[61] Another biochemical process
in the cytoplasm that has long been considered as dependent on ascorbate
is carnitine production. The first step in carnitine biosynthesis
is catalyzed by 6-N-trimethyllysine hydroxylase which
is also a member of the Fe(II)/2-oxoglutarate-dependent family of
dioxygenases. Carnitine is necessary for the transport of long-chain
fatty acids into the mitochondria and ATP production via β-oxidation.
Surprisingly, mice with a severe deficiency in tissue vitamin C (<2%
relative to normal animals) did not show any significant changes in
carnitine levels in serum and multiple organs.[62] It remains unclear whether 6-N-trimethyllysine
hydroxylase has a very low Km for ascorbate
or is more promiscuous in the choice of the reducers for restoration
of catalytic Fe(II) from Fe(III).
Ascorbate in Epigenetic
Regulation
Reprogramming of gene expression is the most recently
discovered
fundamental biological process that is strongly affected by cellular
vitamin C. The lateness of this discovery for ascorbate is related
to the fact that biochemical mechanisms for how two critical steps
in the control of gene expression, demethylation of 5-methylC in DNA
and lysine demethylation of histones, have been defined only relatively
recently. Cell culture and in vivo studies have clearly
shown that ascorbate was important for the erasure of the epigenetic
memory in embryonic stem cells or differentiated cells by acting as
a cofactor for the family of ten−eleven translocation (TET1–3)
proteins that remove cytosine methylation in DNA.[63] Cytosine methylation occurs at its C5 position in CpG dinucleotides
and usually acts as a transcription-repressive mark. TET enzymes are
Fe(II)-dependent dioxygenases that catalyze a series of consecutive
oxidations of 5-methylcytosine by first hydroxylating it to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine,
which is further oxidized to 5-formylcytosine and 5-carboxycytosine.
The last two oxidation products are then removed during base excision
repair by thymine DNA glycosylase and replaced with the unmethylated
cytosine (Figure C).
In addition to in vitro assays with recombinant TET
proteins, there is clear evidence for the importance of ascorbate
in demethylation of 5-methylcytosine in various cultured cells and in vivo.[64−66] Addition of ascorbate to human embryonic stem cells
produced a dramatic impact on their epigenome, involving a widespread
and specific DNA demethylation of 1847 genes.[67] The ascorbate-demethylated group of genes included the gene sets
that experienced a loss of 5-methylcytosine during differentiation
of human embryonic stem cells and contained bivalent marks. A high
ascorbate content of hematopoietic stem cells was necessary for their
DNA demethylation, TET2-dependent gene expression signature and stimulation
of differentiation and suppression of leukemia development.[12,68] Erasure of epigenetic memory to create induced pluripotent stem
cells was dependent on active DNA demethylation by TET proteins which
were shown to be activated by ascorbate through reduction of Fe(III)
to Fe(II).[69] In addition to its differentiation
effects in the developing brain,[70] TET-dependent
regional demethylation of DNA continuously occurs in neurons in the
adult brain, which is important for neuronal activity and memory formation.[71−73] In a mouse model of neurodegeneration, vitamin C deficiency impaired
brain cognition and increased amyloid accumulation and deposition.[74] Efficient DNA demethylation in hematopoietic
stem cells required higher ascorbate concentrations than other ascorbate-promoted
enzymatic processes.[12,68] This property of TET-mediated
DNA demethylation could be a reason for the unusually high ascorbate
concentrations maintained in hematopoietic stem cells and neurons in vivo. These cells are also particularly sensitive to
oxidative stress, as evidenced by the residence of hematopoietic stem
cells in the hypoxic niche of the bone marrow and numerous neurodegenerative
conditions associated with a compromised ability of the brain cells
to deal with oxidants or their damage to proteins or DNA. Neurons
appear to be continuously producing large amounts of superoxide that
in addition to SOD activity requires normal levels of ascorbate for
its efficient elimination.[75]Post-translational
histone modifications represent a second and
more dynamic level of epigenetic regulation of gene expression in
chromatin. Methylation of lysines located in the N-terminal tails
is one of the well-characterized modifications that occurs in chromatin-deposited
histones. The most frequent sites of lysine methylation are K4, K9,
K27, K36, and K79 in histone H3 and K20 in histone H4. Lysine can
be mono-, di-, and trimethylated at its N-6 position. Trimethylation
of histone H3 at K4, K36, and K79 is associated with actively transcribed
genes, whereas the presence of trimethylated K9 and K27 is associated
with gene repression.[76,77] Methylation status of histone
lysines is dynamically regulated in response to transcriptional needs
of cells. Although methylation of histone lysines was known for a
long time, lysine demethylases have been discovered relatively recently.
There are two classes of histone lysine demethylases that differ in
their catalytic mechanisms and substrate specificity. The majority
of lysine demethylases belong to the class of JmjC domain-containing
Fe(II)/2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases (>20 enzymes) that
collectively
can demethylate lysines at any position in histones and are capable
of demethylating mono-, di-, or trimethylated N-6. A pair of flavin
adenine dinucleotide-dependent amine oxidases LSD1 (KDM1A) and LSD2
(KDM1B) represent a second class of histone lysine demethylases.[78,79] LSD1 and LSD2 can remove a methyl group only from mono- or dimethylated
lysines and act specifically on methylated lysine-4 in histone H3.
Amine oxidation in the methylated lysine by LSD1/2 generates an unstable
imine which is spontaneously hydrolyzed, releasing formaldehyde and
yielding unmethylated lysine.JmjC histone demethylases catalyze
hydroxylation of a methyl group
in lysines, which results in its dissociation in the form of formaldehyde
(Figure D).[80] Similar to other Fe(II)/2-oxoglutarate-dependent
dioxygenases, JmjC histone demethylases require ascorbate for their
optimal catalytic activity. In vitro histone lysine
demethylation by JmjC hydroxylases was inhibited when ascorbate was
omitted from the assay.[81,82] In cellular models,
ascorbate was identified as a critical factor for histone demethylation
and epigenetic changes during reprogramming of somatic cells into
induced pluripotent stem cells by acting as the activator of H3K36
and H3K9 demethylases.[83,84] Ascorbate-induced demethylation
of H3K9me2 in stem cells resulted from a specific activation of histone
demethylases Kdm3a and Kdm3b. Importantly, vitamin C-stimulated Kdm3a/b-mediated
H3K9me2 demethylation and TET-mediated DNA demethylation were independent
processes.[85] It is expected that nuclear
ascorbate is a major stimulative factor for activity of all JmjC histone
demethylases, although the degree of their sensitivity to its levels
relative to other reducers of Fe(III) may vary.
Vitamin C in Cancer Therapy
Two open-label studies in the 1970s led by Nobel prize-winning
biochemist Linus Pauling and conducted in terminal cancerpatients
using intravenous administration of large doses of vitamin C have
found significant beneficial effects on survival.[86,87] However, follow-up double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials
did not show any survival benefits of vitamin C in cancerpatients,[88,89] which effectively shut down for a long time the whole notion that
vitamin C could work as an anticancer treatment. What was not appreciated
until recently is the difference in the delivery of pharmacological
doses of vitamin C between early positive studies and the later negative
trials. In the follow-up trials, vitamin C was given orally, which
is now known to provide only a limited increase in systemic ascorbate
which is tightly regulated via the rates of absorption and urinary
excretion.[90,91] Therapeutic effects of large
doses of vitamin C have been linked to a preferential accumulation
of dehydroascorbic acid by cancer cells due to their common overexpression
of GLUT transporters. In colorectal cancers, the overexpression of
GLUT1glucose transporter and hyperaccumulation of dehydroascorbic
acid were specifically associated with mutations in KRAS and BRAF oncogenes.[92] GLUT1 is also strongly upregulated by hypoxic signaling, and humanclear cell renal carcinomas lacking the HIF1α/2α-targeting
ubiquitin ligase VHL were more sensitive to killing by high doses
of vitamin C through its hyperaccumulation.[93] The cause of death in cancer cells that hyperaccumulated dehydroascorbic
acid was linked to the exhaustion of energy resources and glutathione
which were consumed by the reduction of dehydroascorbic acid to ascorbate.[92] Overexpression of GLUT1 is associated with a
metabolic reprogramming of cancer cells toward aerobic glycolysis
(Warburg effect), which makes them more dependent on the inefficient
ATP generation in glycolysis and, therefore, more vulnerable to energy
depletion by dehydroascorbate reduction. Several studies have also
linked a hyperaccumulation of ascorbate in cancer cells with the increased
production of oxidants as a result of elevated levels of labile iron
which, unlike its protein-bound form, readily catalyzes the Fenton
reaction with the resulting generation of a highly toxic •OH radical.[94−96] Oxidative and energy stresses by high vitamin C doses
were associated with the induction of DNA damage and PARP hyperactivation-dependent
cytotoxicity.[93,97,98] A mechanistically distinct process based on the increased differentiation
of stem cells operates in the suppression of leukemia by vitamin C.
Patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia
frequently carry inactivating mutations in TET2, which leads to a
DNA hypomethylation phenotype and impaired differentiation of hematopoietic
stem cells. Treatment with vitamin C mimicked TET restoration by enhancing
5-methylcytosine oxidation and promoting differentiation of stem cells
and suppression of leukemia in mouse models and in primary patient-derived
xenografts.[12,68] A combination of vitamin C with
clinically used drugs or ionizing radiation enhanced the killing of
cancer cells of different histological origins.[16,99,100] For many combined regiments, the increased
killing of cancer cells can be attributed to their stressed energy
metabolism and elevated ROS, diminishing their ability to survive
chemotherapeutic or radiation treatments. In the case of bleomycin,
a drug using Fe(II)-activated oxygen to oxidize and break DNA, ascorbate
enhanced its DNA-damaging activity by acting as a very effective reducer
of Fe(III) to Fe(II).[44] The administration
of high doses of vitamin C or possibly just restoration of its levels
in ascorbate-deficient patients can also promote epigenetic and transcriptomic
changes, making cancer cells more susceptible to specific cancer treatments,
as it was found for ascorbate-induced sensitization of melanoma to
BET inhibitors.[101] Vitamin C has also diminished
the aggressiveness of many cancers by inhibiting their growth, invasiveness,
and metastasis.[16,102] These beneficial responses were
promoted by a decreased hypoxic signaling produced by a more efficient
proline hydroxylation of HIF-1/HIF-2 and, consequently, their more
rapid degradation in ascorbate-enriched cells. These transcription
factors are known to promote motility, invasiveness, and metastasis
of cancer cells and are markers of aggressive tumors.[57] In ascorbate-deficient tumors, vitamin C supplementation
could also boost the production of mature collagen[48] and consequently, strengthen cell–cell adherence
and the extracellular matrix, which would exert suppressive effects
on the ability of cancer cells to migrate and invade surrounding tissue
and reach distant sites. Another broad mechanism which has been overlooked
so far in practically all preclinical models is the impact of vitamin
C on anticancer immune responses. Humor tumor xenografts are grown
in immunodeficientmice in order to avoid their immune rejection.
Thus, this commonly used in vivo model excludes any
contribution of the immune cells to antitumor responses. A recent
study of lymphoma growth in the immunocompetent mice showed that vitamin
C administration was synergistic with a clinically used anti-PD1 immune
checkpoint treatment via increased DNA demethylation in tumor and
immune cells.[103] The combination therapy
strongly increased intratumor infiltration of CD8+ T lymphocytes,
granzyme B production by cytotoxic T cells and natural killer cells,
and interleukin-12 biosynthesis by antigen-presenting cells compared
with anti-PD1 alone. These findings raise a possibility that vitamin
C may act a general promoter of immune responses against many cancers
that are responsive to anti-PD1/PD-L1 therapy.
Vitamin C Deficiency in
Cultured Cells and Its Remediation
Various tissue culture
media have been historically formulated
to provide robust growth of cells by abundantly supplying them with
energy-generating and macromolecule-building nutrients. Much less
attention has been given to micronutrients, most of which are provided
via the addition of fetal bovine serum to growth media. Vitamin C
is a such micronutrient that is absent in the majority of cell culture
media. The typical addition of 10% fetal bovine serum to culture media
theoretically should provide the 1/10th of the physiological concentration
of vitamin C, which in practice is much lower due to its loss during
storage of serum and serum-supplemented media. Overnight fed cells
typically contain low micromolar concentrations of vitamin C (5–20
μM),[104,105] which is approximately 1% of
its levels in cells in vivo. Vitamin C usually becomes
undetectable in cultured cells at 2 days postfeeding. Primary and
other cells growing in growth factor-supplemented synthetic media
without addition of serum are completely devoid of vitamin C. Although
rodents produce their own ascorbic acid, its synthesis occurs in the
liver,[106−108] and all nonhepatic rodent cells in culture
are also vitamin C deficient. It is unclear how much ascorbic acid
biosynthesis remains in primary rodent hepatocytes which exhibit major
changes in their metabolic activities within a few days in culture.
A monolayer of rodent hepatocytes would also need to continuously
generate massive amounts of ascorbic acid to establish and maintain
its physiological concentration in a very large volume of media relative
to the number of cells in the dishes. In the absence of extracellular
vitamin C in culture, primary and other cells rapidly lose their cellular
ascorbate. Thus, it is likely that even rodent hepatocytes in culture
are vitamin C deficient.A full restoration of vitamin C levels
in cells can be achieved
by the addition of dehydroascorbic acid that readily enters cells
via ubiquitously expressed GLUT transporters. Glucose competitively
inhibits the uptake of dehydroascorbic acid, which hinders restoration
of cellular ascorbate when high-glucose growth media are used. A switch
to a low-glucose growth medium or a balanced salt solution (Krebs
buffer) supplemented with low glucose (0.5–1 mM) and a regular
serum percentage can result in the full restoration of physiological
levels of ascorbate in cells after only 1–2 h of incubation.[44,104] Expression of GLUT transporters is impacted by many factors, and
the optimal concentrations of dehydroascorbic acid should be determined
for each cell line. A more gradual delivery of vitamin C, but usually
only to subphysiological levels, can be accomplished by the supplementation
of culture media with ascorbate (daily additions of 50–200
μM). Even when ascorbate is used as a source of vitamin C supplementation,
its easy oxidation in media can lead to a significant formation and
uptake of dehydroascorbic acid. This is especially common for cells
grown in serum-free media which contain large amounts of iron to compensate
for the absence of transferrin-mediated iron uptake from serum. The
addition of ascorbate-2-phosphate, a more stable derivative of ascorbate,
typically leads to higher levels of cellular vitamin C, and it has
a lower risk of the formation of ROS in the growth media. Ascorbate-2-phosphate
is not redox-active, and the release of ascorbate occurs after its
dephosphorylation in cells.Methodological challenges associated
with vitamin C supplementation
in culture include its relatively rapid loss from cells.[109,110] Consequently, cells should be used either shortly after restoration
of ascorbate concentrations or periodic additions of a freshly prepared
stock of ascorbic acid in cold H2O are employed for a prolonged
maintenance of vitamin C levels in cells. Even though oxidation of
ascorbate to dehydroascorbic acid still yields a biologically active
form of vitamin C, it is relatively unstable and undergoes irreversible
hydrolysis and further rearrangements. Incubations with excessive
amounts of vitamin C can cause cytotoxicity,[122,111] which can result either from the overloading of cells with dehydroascorbic
acid when its reduction to ascorbate consumes important cellular reducers
or from excessive amounts of ascorbate in O2-rich media
where it reacts with iron and catalyzes the production of toxic ROS.
Cancer cells are characterized by a strongly elevated uptake of glucose
and overexpression of GLUT transporters, which makes them more sensitive
to killing by high doses of dehydroascorbic acid.[92,93] Vitamin C restoration in cells can be assessed by its direct measurements
and/or by a functional test such as a suppression of ATM-dependent
phosphorylation of its targets KAP1 and/or CHK2 by chromate.[113]
Assays for Vitamin C Forms
Irrespective
of the use of HPLC or microplate readers, the majority
of the currently used assays for vitamin C in biological samples can
be divided into two groups based on whether they measure its reduced
(ascorbic acid) or oxidized (dehydroascorbic acid) forms. Ascorbic
acid is measured by electrochemical detectors coupled with HPLC or
by spectrophotometric methods detecting Fe(II) formation from Fe(III)
(known as the FRASC assay - ferric reducing/antioxidant and ascorbic
acid). Fluorescence-based assays (HPLC or microplate reader versions)
detect the formation of dehydroascorbic acid conjugates with dyes
such as o-phenylenediamine[114] or 1,2-diamino-4,5-dimethoxybenzene.[110] For measurements of total vitamin C by electrochemical detection,
samples are treated with a reducer to convert dehydroascorbic acid
into ascorbic acid.[115] In the FRASC assay,
dehydroascorbic acid is not detectable, which may result in a significant
underestimation of total vitamin C due to its ready autoxidation in
samples ex vivo. Assays based on the conjugation
of dyes with dehydroascorbic acid use pretreatments of samples with
ascorbate oxidase or TEMPOL to convert all vitamin C into its oxidized
form. A detection of both oxidized and reduced forms of vitamin C
has been challenging due to a very small percentage of the dehydroascorbic
acid that is typically present in biological samples (tissues, cells
or plasma/serum). Dehydroascorbic acid values were typically calculated
from the differences in HPLC-electrochemical measurements between
samples treated with reducer (total ascorbate) and untreated samples
(ascorbate only).[115] These estimates are
not very precise or accurate as they derive from subtraction of a
large number from only a slightly larger number. In assays utilizing
dehydroascorbate conjugation with dyes, omission of ascorbate oxidase
or TEMPOL still results in a very significant reaction of probes with
ascorbate through catalysis of its oxidation. LC-MS is currently the
only method for the direct determination of both abundant ascorbate
and scarce dehydroascorbic acid.[92]
Concluding
Remarks: Vitamin C in Mechanistic Toxicology/Pharmacology
The multitude of antioxidant and biochemical functions of ascorbate
makes it important that biologically relevant concentrations of vitamin
C are included in studies of toxic and other stress responses in cultured
cells. Vitamin C addition is routinely used in the field of stem cell
biology, but this practice has not yet been commonly accepted in toxicology/pharmacology
or stress biology in general even when epigenetic changes or ROS effects
are specifically examined. For oxidants, cellular ascorbate was found
to exert major effects on the type and magnitude of genotoxic events[44,104] and epigenetic alterations.[116] In addition
to the changes in the magnitude of cytotoxicity or other general responses,
ascorbate can dramatically alter the relative importance of specific
signaling mechanisms activated in cells by carcinogens and DNA-damaging
cancer drugs.[16,44,110,113] The importance of extracellular
ascorbate should also be considered when a chemical is known to react
with ascorbate directly or with Fe(II) that is abundantly produced
in ascorbate-supplemented media.[124] Histone
lysine demethylation is a dynamic process that occurs continuously
during transcription cycles and in response to promoter binding by
transcription factors. The important function of ascorbate as a cofactor
for histone demethylases raises a possibility that transcriptomic
and, consequently, downstream biological responses to many redox-inactive
xenobiotics and stressors can also be affected to some extent by nuclear
ascorbate.The importance of ascorbate in the regulation of
cellular reprogramming
and gene expression via its cofactor functions for the DNA-demethylating
TET enzymes and histone lysine demethylases raises a possibility that
populations with vitamin C insufficiency could be particularly susceptible
to adverse health effects of epigenetic toxicants. Mice and rats continuously
produce large amounts of vitamin C, which may limit their sensitivity
in capturing intergenerational and other epigenetic consequences of
human malnutrition and its combination with other stressors or drugs.
Clearly established roles of ascorbate in neurodevelopment, memory
formation, and the development of neurodegenerative processes[71−74] raise a possibility that individuals with low systemic levels of
vitamin C could be especially vulnerable to neurotoxic effects of
chemicals and/or other stressors. This vulnerability would be difficult
to detect in standard rodent models, although the use of Gulo–/– mice or similarly deficient rats can
be readily adapted to assess the impact of vitamin C insufficiency.Vitamin C levels in rodent and human tissues are generally similar,
but concentrations of ascorbate in the lung lining fluids of laboratory
rodents are more than 10× higher than those in humans.[118−120] This difference accounts for a rapid extracellular inactivation
of soluble chromate in rodent lungs, making them resistant to carcinogenesis
by this Cr(VI) form in contrast to its carcinogenicity in human lungs.
Slowly solubilizing particles of chromium(VI) escape this detoxification
by extracellular ascorbate and induce genotoxicity upon their intracellular
dissolution.[117] Oxidative stress in the
lung is a common adverse effect for many inhaled toxicants. The use
of standard laboratory rodents containing very high levels of ascorbate
in the lung lining fluid represents an additional uncertainty in their
use for the mechanistic assessment of human health risks by airborne
contaminants.
Authors: Kazimierz S Kasprzak; Bhalchandra A Diwan; Monika Z Kaczmarek; Daniel L Logsdon; Mathew J Fivash; Konstantin Salnikow Journal: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol Date: 2011-08-22 Impact factor: 4.219
Authors: Garrett A Kaas; Chun Zhong; Dawn E Eason; Daniel L Ross; Raj V Vachhani; Guo-Li Ming; Jennifer R King; Hongjun Song; J David Sweatt Journal: Neuron Date: 2013-09-18 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Wan Seok Yang; Katherine J Kim; Michael M Gaschler; Milesh Patel; Mikhail S Shchepinov; Brent R Stockwell Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-08-09 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Kimberly J Briggs; Peppi Koivunen; Shugeng Cao; Keriann M Backus; Benjamin A Olenchock; Hetalben Patel; Qing Zhang; Sabina Signoretti; Gary J Gerfen; Andrea L Richardson; Agnieszka K Witkiewicz; Benjamin F Cravatt; Jon Clardy; William G Kaelin Journal: Cell Date: 2016-06-30 Impact factor: 41.582