Literature DB >> 16716899

Causes of DNA single-strand breaks during reduction of chromate by glutathione in vitro and in cells.

Joseph Messer1, Mindy Reynolds, Lauren Stoddard, Anatoly Zhitkovich.   

Abstract

Carcinogenic chromates induce DNA single-strand breaks (SSB) that are detectable by conventional alkali-based assays. However, the extent of direct breakage has been uncertain because excision repair and hydrolysis of Cr-DNA adducts at alkaline pH also generate SSB. We examined mechanisms of SSB production during chromate reduction by glutathione (GSH) and assessed the significance of these lesions in cells using genetic approaches. Cr(VI) reduction was biphasic and the formation of SSB occurred exclusively during the slow reaction phase. Catalase or iron chelators completely blocked DNA breakage, as did the use of GSH purified by a modified Chelex procedure. Thus, the direct intermediates of GSH-chromate reactions were unable to cause SSB unless activated by H2O2. SSB repair-deficient XRCC1(-/-) and proficient XRCC1+ EM9 cells had identical survival at doses causing up to 60% clonogenic death and accumulation of 1 mM Cr(VI). However, XRCC1(-/-) cells displayed higher lethality in the more toxic range and the depletion of GSH made them hypersensitive even to moderate doses. Elevation of cellular catalase or GSH levels eliminated survival differences between XRCC1(-/-) and XRCC1+ cells. In summary, formation of toxic SSB in cells occurs at relatively high chromate doses, requires H2O2, and is suppressed by high GSH concentrations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16716899     DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2006.01.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med        ISSN: 0891-5849            Impact factor:   7.376


  34 in total

1.  Reduction with glutathione is a weakly mutagenic pathway in chromium(VI) metabolism.

Authors:  David Guttmann; Graham Poage; Tatiana Johnston; Anatoly Zhitkovich
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.739

2.  Mechanism of DNA-protein cross-linking by chromium.

Authors:  Andrea Macfie; Elizabeth Hagan; Anatoly Zhitkovich
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 3.739

3.  Roles of Bacillus subtilis RecA, Nucleotide Excision Repair, and Translesion Synthesis Polymerases in Counteracting Cr(VI)-Promoted DNA Damage.

Authors:  Fernando Santos-Escobar; Hilda C Leyva-Sánchez; Norma Ramírez-Ramírez; Armando Obregón-Herrera; Mario Pedraza-Reyes
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Undetectable role of oxidative DNA damage in cell cycle, cytotoxic and clastogenic effects of Cr(VI) in human lung cells with restored ascorbate levels.

Authors:  Mindy Reynolds; Susan Armknecht; Tatiana Johnston; Anatoly Zhitkovich
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  Chromium(VI) causes interstrand DNA cross-linking in vitro but shows no hypersensitivity in cross-link repair-deficient human cells.

Authors:  Jessica L Morse; Michal W Luczak; Anatoly Zhitkovich
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 3.739

6.  Upregulation of histone-lysine methyltransferases plays a causal role in hexavalent chromium-induced cancer stem cell-like property and cell transformation.

Authors:  Zhishan Wang; Jianjun Wu; Brock Humphries; Kazuya Kondo; Yiguo Jiang; Xianglin Shi; Chengfeng Yang
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 4.219

7.  Acetate biostimulation as an effective treatment for cleaning up alkaline soil highly contaminated with Cr(VI).

Authors:  Paloma Lara; Enrique Morett; Katy Juárez
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Deoxyamphimedine, a pyridoacridine alkaloid, damages DNA via the production of reactive oxygen species.

Authors:  Kathryn M Marshall; Cynthia D Andjelic; Deniz Tasdemir; Gisela P Concepción; Chris M Ireland; Louis R Barrows
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2009-05-25       Impact factor: 5.118

Review 9.  Genetic and epigenetic mechanisms in metal carcinogenesis and cocarcinogenesis: nickel, arsenic, and chromium.

Authors:  Konstantin Salnikow; Anatoly Zhitkovich
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 3.739

10.  Global transcriptome analysis of hexavalent chromium stress responses in Staphylococcus aureus LZ-01.

Authors:  Xiaowei Zhang; Wenyang Wu; Nolan Virgo; Luming Zou; Pu Liu; Xiangkai Li
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-08-03       Impact factor: 2.823

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.