Co-translational folding studies of membrane proteins lag behind cytosolic protein investigations largely due to the technical difficulty in maintaining membrane lipid environments for correct protein folding. Stalled ribosome-bound nascent chain complexes (RNCs) can give snapshots of a nascent protein chain as it emerges from the ribosome during biosynthesis. Here, we demonstrate how SecM-facilitated nascent chain stalling and native nanodisc technologies can be exploited to capture in vivo-generated membrane protein RNCs within their native lipid compositions. We reveal that a polytopic membrane protein can be successfully stalled at various stages during its synthesis and the resulting RNC extracted within either detergent micelles or diisobutylene-maleic acid co-polymer native nanodiscs. Our approaches offer tractable solutions for the structural and biophysical interrogation of nascent membrane proteins of specified lengths, as the elongating nascent chain emerges from the ribosome and inserts into its native lipid milieu.
Co-translational folding studies of membrane proteins lag behind cytosolic protein investigations largely due to the technical difficulty in maintaining membrane lipid environments for correct protein folding. Stalled ribosome-bound nascent chain complexes (RNCs) can give snapshots of a nascent protein chain as it emerges from the ribosome during biosynthesis. Here, we demonstrate how SecM-facilitated nascent chain stalling and native nanodisc technologies can be exploited to capture in vivo-generated membrane protein RNCs within their native lipid compositions. We reveal that a polytopic membrane protein can be successfully stalled at various stages during its synthesis and the resulting RNC extracted within either detergent micelles or diisobutylene-maleic acidco-polymer native nanodiscs. Our approaches offer tractable solutions for the structural and biophysical interrogation of nascent membrane proteins of specified lengths, as the elongating nascent chain emerges from the ribosome and inserts into its native lipid milieu.
Most proteins begin to fold
as they are translated unidirectionally from N- to C-termini by the
ribosome. A significant drawback to much existing research into folding
mechanisms is the study of full-length, isolated proteins that are
unrepresentative of this co-translational cellular biosynthesis. A
key advance has been the development of ribosome nascent chain (RNC)
preparations in which elongating nascent chains are stalled at various
points, so that biophysical methods can be used to probe the structures
of specified length chains attached to ribosomes.[1−9] Typically, the Escherichia coliarrest sequence
SecM is employed to halt translation.[2,9,10] Stalling translation, as well as truncating nascent
chains, has proven to be instrumental in membrane protein insertion
studies, but as yet, no membrane protein RNCs have been isolated directly
from cells in their native lipid environments, which hinders detailed
molecular mechanistic and structural investigations.Co-translational
folding of α-helical transmembrane (TM)
proteins is often assisted by a membrane insertase apparatus, such
as the E. coli SecYEG translocon. SecYEG forms the
basis of a holotranslocon (HTL), along with co-proteins SecDF and
insertase YidC.[11] An emerging nascent chain
is delivered to the SecYEG translocon by the signal recognition particle
(SRP). Lipid interactions influence membrane insertion,[12,13] with lipid headgroup charge and interactions with the nascent chain
affecting TM insertion efficiency and topology.[14] The bulk properties of the lipid bilayer, such as its lateral
pressure and hydrophobic thickness, also likely impact membrane protein
insertion and folding.[12] Thus, the cell membrane “arena”
required for membrane protein folding adds increasing complexity to
the already intricate co-translational folding pathway of proteins.Membrane protein co-translational folding and insertion have largely
been studied using in vitro transcription/translation
(IVTT). This in vitro approach enables control of
protein translation within simplified cell and membrane extracts,
or purified components such as the PURExpress system[15] and synthetic lipid mixtures. Assorted investigations of
the inserted state have been undertaken using biochemical assays such
as epitope binding, limited proteolysis, and chemical cross-linking.[16−22] Moreover, structure formation during co-translational folding has
been probed by infrared spectroscopy.[21] These studies have led to exceptional insight into the co-translational
insertion of membrane proteins; however, these translation systems
often give low yields and are expensive.The use of the E. coli SecM stalling sequence,
found in nature to regulate the translation rate of higher-order proteins
during co-translational folding,[23,24] is perhaps
the most common method for RNC generation. In wild-type (WT) SecM,
a proline at position 166 alters the geometry of the peptidyl transferase
center (PTC) preventing the formation of the ester linkage, resulting
in the subsequent stalling of the ribosome along the mRNA.[9,24,25] Insertion of a SecM sequence
downstream of a nascent chain allows RNCs to be generated both in vitro and in vivo,[23] thus trapping a polypeptide chain at a specified “length”.
In addition, SecM has been used to give a measure of the force exerted
on a TM helix during membrane insertion,[16,17,26] and an amino acid hydrophobicity scale has
been derived from apparent free energies of TM insertion.[27] Other stalling sequences exist, such as the
TnaC stalling peptide that makes extensive contacts with the majority
of the ribosome exit tunnel,[6] rather than
altering the PTC. Although these stalling methods have proven to be
highly informative, we are still some way from understanding the molecular
details of membrane protein co-translational folding, with our molecular
and mechanistic knowledge currently deriving from refolding studies
of full-length isolated nascent chains.[28]For water-soluble proteins, the production and purification
of
high yields of homogeneous RNCs samples have enabled structural snapshots
to be obtained at different nascent chain lengths, in particular by
cryo-electron microscopy (cryoEM) analysis.[1−3] Moreover, it
has been shown that RNCs are suited for advanced biophysical analysis,
impressive examples being the use of solution-state nuclear magnetic
resonance (NMR) to decipher a nascent chain structural ensemble[1−3,9] and mechanical force manipulation
for stability assessment of the nascent chain fold.[29,30]Membrane protein RNCs are considerably more challenging to
isolate
than those for water-soluble proteins, as they are complicated by
the requirement of a lipid membrane. Nevertheless, notable achievements
have been made in the cryoEM structural characterization of membrane
protein RNCs. For example, Beckmann et al. found, at high resolution,
that interaction of a TM nascent chain with SecY can cause opening
of its channel, likely to facilitate its insertion into the membrane.
To achieve this interaction, they used detergent-solubilized RNCs
that were then subsequently reconstituted with SecY-containing membrane
scaffold protein (MSP)-based nanodiscs consisting of non-native lipidDMPC.[4,5] Membrane mimetics such as these provide
a lipid bilayer but lack the native lipid composition and, therefore,
may not truly represent its functional environment.To improve
this, polymer scaffolds have recently been used as a
method to directly solubilize MPs within nanodiscs of their native
lipid surround (so-called “native” nanodiscs), thus
removing the requirement for detergent purification and reconstitution.
The most widely used scaffold is the styrene-maleic acid (SMA) co-polymer.
However, when considering the preparation and analysis of ribosome-containing
samples, the SMAco-polymer has its disadvantages: SMA contains a
large styrene aromatic ring that contributes to high-absorption spectra
in the low-ultraviolet region, which makes concentration and purity
analysis of RNCs using A280/A260 difficult.[31,32] SMA is also less tolerant
to divalent cations, with the precipitation of the polymer occurring
at Mg2+ concentrations of >5 mM.[33] An E. coli 70S ribosome contains more
than 170
Mg2+ atoms, with the loss of bound Mg2+ leading
to 70S dissociation and degradation.[34] Therefore,
to maintain 70S integrity, an in vitro Mg2+ concentration of >5 mM is typically required, making SMA unsuitable
for RNC study. To circumvent these spectroscopic and divalent cation
issues, the recently utilized diisobutylene-maleic acid (DIBMA) co-polymer
was selected.[31] Its polymer structure contains
an aliphatic diisobutylene moiety instead of the aromatic styrene
component found within SMA. This allows for spectroscopic study as
the styrene component that absorbed strongly within the range of 260–280
nm has been removed. Importantly, DIBMA also has a proven tolerance
to high concentrations of divalent cations (≤20 mM for Mg2+ and ≤35 mM for Ca2+),[31,35] making it a suitable candidate for ribosome study. Both DIBMA and
SMA co-polymers produce thermostable MP nanodiscs, but DIBMA has a
weaker impact on the acyl chain order and lipid phase in solubilized
membranes than SMA, maintaining a nearer physiological membrane environment.[31]In view of the importance of lipid composition
and membrane properties
in defining the behavior of membrane proteins, we have developed an
approach to extracting RNCs directly from their cellular membrane.
We present a strategy for producing high yields of homogeneous polytopic
membrane protein RNCs within their native lipid environments. Membrane
protein RNCs are isolated from native membranes using DIBMA co-polymer
native nanodisc technology.[33,36,37] Overall, our approach enables the structural and biochemical interrogation
of cellular co-translational membrane protein translation and folding
within a more physiological environment than is currently possible
with existing in vitro or reconstituted systems.
Materials
and Methods
Plasmid Construction
His6-GlpG-SecM plasmids
were constructed for GlpG RNC overexpression. pET28a was linearized
with NdeI and XhoI restriction enzymes (New England Biolabs). The
glpg gene (subcloned from Harris et al.[21]) and a 44-amino acid sequence motif encoding both the SecM arrest
motif and additional amino acids (subcloned from Rutkowska et al.[9]) were amplified and cloned simultaneously into
the linearized pET28a vector using In-Fusion HD cloning (Takara Bio).
The resulting pET28a-His6-GlpG-SecM vector was then used
in subsequent deletion cloning reactions to generate constructs of
different GlpG “lengths” using the Q5 site-directed
mutagenesis kit (New England Biolabs). A pET28a-His6-GlpG
plasmid was also generated for overexpression of His6-GlpG
without the linker-SecM sequence using the same procedures.To substitute the WT SecM sequence for the arrest-enhanced (AE1)
SecM sequence, primers were designed for the AE1 sequence based on
Cymer et al.,[26] and polymerase chain reaction
was carried out using the Q5 site-directed mutagenesis kit (New England
Biolabs) on each RNC vector.
GlpG-RNC Growth in BL21 (DE3)
N-Terminal
His6-tagged GlpG constructs were truncated after two, four,
and six TM
helices using a WT SecM sequence, cloned into the pET28a expression
vector, and transformed into E. coli strain BL21
(DE3). The following growth conditions are based on NMR protocols
yielding large quantities of highly occupied RNCs,[2] which provide a maximal number of ribosomes ready for NC
expression and are amenable to isotopic or selective labeling of the
NCs.Overnight LB cultures grown at 37 °C were used to
seed 6 L of MDG {phosphate (M), aspartic acid (D), glucose (G) media
[1× MDG salts (25 mM Na2HPO4, 25 mM KH2PO4, 50 mM NH4Cl, and 5 mM Na2SO4), 0.2% (w/v) l-aspartic acid (pH 7.0), 0.4%
(w/v) d-glucose, 2 mM MgSO4, and 0.2× trace
metals, which were subsequently grown to saturation at 30 °C
with shaking at 220 rpm]}. Cells were harvested by centrifugation
before suspension of an equal volume of enhanced M9 media [1×
EM9 salts (7.1 g/L Na2HPO4, 3.4 g/L KH2PO4, and 0.58 g/L NaCl adjusted to pH 8.0–8.2),
0.4% (w/v) d-glucose, 5 mM MgSO4, 200 μM
CaCl2, 0.25× trace metals, and 0.1% (w/v) NH4Cl] for induction. Trace metals were mixed as a 1000× stock
containing 5 g/L EDTA, 0.83 g/L FeCl3·6H2O, 0.05 g/L ZnCl2, 0.01 g/L CuCl2, 0.01 g/L
CoCl2·6H2O, 0.01 g/L H3BO3, and 1.6 g/L MnCl2·6H2O (pH 7.0).
All media were supplemented with 30 μg/mL kanamycin. Cells were
induced for protein production using 1 mM isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) for 1.5–2 h at 30 °C
before being washed with ice-cold PBS, harvested, and resuspended
in lysis buffer [50 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 7.5), 1 M KOAc, 12 mM Mg(OAc)2, 5% (v/v) glycerol, 5 mM EDTA, 2 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 1
mM phenylmethanesulfonyl (PMSF), 250 μg/mL chloramphenicol,
and cOmplete EDTA-free protease inhibitor tablet (Roche)] with 1%
lysozyme and RNase-free DNase I (NEB) and stored at −20 °C
or flash-frozen and stored at −70 °C as “pellets”
for cryo-milling.For biotinylated RNC-GlpG, constructs with
an N-terminal Avi tag
were co-transformed with pBirAcm (Avidity), maintained by 10 μg/mL
chloramphenicol, to express BirA. Cells were also grown to saturation
in MDG media. However, to the enhanced M9 media was added 50 μM d-biotin dissolved in 10 mM bicine buffer (pH 8.3). The two
plasmids were both induced using 1 mM IPTG and grown as described
above, producing biotinylated RNC-GlpG constructs.Alternatively,
BL21-AI cells can be grown and RNCs expressed in
Luria-Bertani or 2-YT medium. For these, 100 mL overnight cultures
were seeded as described above, and cells grown at 37 °C until
an OD600 of 1.8 was reached. Cultures were cooled to 30
°C and induced with 1 mM IPTG and 0.1% l-arabinose for
1 h. Cells were washed and harvested as described above.
DIBMA Preparation
The diisobutylene/maleic acid co-polymer
(DIBMA) was precipitated out of a Sokalan CP9 solution (BASF) with
0.6 V of 4 M HCl. The solid was centrifuged at 17000g for 15 min and washed with doubly distilled H2O (ddH2O). This was repeated four times; 1.2 V of 4 M NaOH was used
to solubilize the solid, before repeating the precipitation and washing
steps described above. The wet pellet was then lyophilized for 72
h to produce the pure DIBMA polymer.[38,39]The
polymer was used to produce 20% (w/v) stocks in 2 M NaOH. Base was
then added dropwise to carefully dissolve the solid and adjust the
pH to 8.0. The concentration of the polymer solution was checked using
a Reichert AR200 digital refractometer with a dn/dc of 1.346 M–1.[31] The 20% stock was used to produce 2.5% stocks in the necessary buffer
for the solubilization of E. coli membranes.Lyophilized DIBMAstocks were quality checked[39] using a Shimadzu IR Affinity-1s or a PerkinElmer Spectrum
Two FTIR instrument, scanned across a complete wavenumber range of
4000–400 cm–1, with 16 scans to measure transmittance
(Figure S3a). In particular, the carboxylate
(1705 cm–1) and anhydride (1775 cm–1) bands were checked to ensure that our treatment of the polymer
with strong acids did not result in a condensation of the anhydride
ring, which would result in a significantly reduced solubilization
efficiency.
Purification of DDM and DIBMA GlpG-RNCs
The cell lysis
buffer described above and all subsequent RNC preparation buffers
were prepared using RNase-free water to prevent the degradation of
the rRNA content in our RNCs. This was prepared by incubating ddH2O with 0.1% diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC) to inactivate any
RNase, prior to autoclaving that facilitated the removal of DEPC by
decomposition into CO2 and ethanol.Cells were defrosted
slowly and lysed using sonication, or cryo-milled in a Spex 6875 Freezer/Mill
High Capacity Cryogenic Grinder using 15 cycles of 15 cps and allowed
to thaw on ice. The cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 20000g for 45 min at 4 °C. This was repeated in fresh tubes
if the resulting supernatant did not clear. The supernatant was then
spun at 125000g for 30 min at 4 °C to harvest
cell membranes with associated ribosomes. The crude membrane pellet
was resuspended at concentrations of 25–50 mg/mL in washing
buffer [50 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 7.5), 500 mM KOAc, 12 mM Mg(OAc)2, 5% (v/v) glycerol, 2 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, and 1 mM PMSF] aided
by homogenization. To this suspension, 1% dodecyl maltoside (DDM)
or 2.5% DIBMA (pH adjusted to 8.0) was added, and the mixture solubilized
for 2 h at 4 °C or for 1 h at 25 °C, respectively. The solubilized
membranes were spun at 125000g, and the supernatant
was filtered before purification using an AKTA Pure system.DDM-solubilized ribosomes carrying the nascent chain were purified
using an AKTA Pure purification system. First, samples were separated
by affinity chromatography using a HisTrap Nickel column. The column
was washed with 5 column volumes of washing buffer containing 0.1%
DDM. RNCs were passed over the column to allow binding. The column
was washed with 30 mL of washing buffer with 20 mM imidazole with
0.1% DDM. RNCs were then eluted in washing buffer containing 500 mM
imidazole and directly loaded onto a 16/60 HiPrepSephacryl S-400
HR size-exclusion column pre-equilibrated with Tico size-exclusion
buffer [10 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 7.5), 30 mM NH3Cl, 12 mM Mg(OAc)2, 5% (v/v) glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 2 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, and
0.1 mM PMSF] containing 0.1% DDM. According to the manufacturer’s
specifications, the separation range of the Sephacryl S-400 column
is 20 kDa to 8 MDa.DIBMA-solubilized ribosomes with native
membranes were first bound
overnight at 4 °C to superaffinity Ni-NTA beads (Generon) pre-equilibrated
with washing buffer before further cleanup using AKTA Pure. The supernatant
containing unbound species was discarded, and beads were washed with
20 mM imidazole in washing buffer, before elution in 5 mL of washing
buffer containing 500 mM imidazole. DDM was not present in any of
these buffers. The eluate was subsequently concentrated to 2 mL using
a 100 or 300 kDa concentrator and loaded directly onto the 16/60 HiPrepSephacryl S-400 HR size-exclusion column pre-equilibrated with Tico
size-exclusion buffer containing 0.2 M l-arginine. The left-hand
side of the elution peak, previously shown to contain the highest
proportion of 70S ribosomes with the nascent chain,[40] was taken and concentrated, and buffer exchange was carried
out in a 100 or 300 kDa molecular weight cutoff spin concentrator
and passed over a PD10 G25-superdex column, which facilitated the
removal of arginine.The RNC absorbance at 260 and 280 nm was
monitored to evaluate
the 70S content and its homogeneity using the OD260/OD280 ratio (expected range of 1.9−2.0; 1 OD260 = 24 pmol/mL[41])]. The samples were flash-frozen
after purification; the samples were stable after freezing and thawing
and observed to be homogeneous.
Western Blotting Analysis
To assess the RNC integrity,
1–2 pmol samples were run on 12% (w/v) NuPAGE gels at neutral
pH and with a sample dye at pH 5.7 [30% glycerol, 0.25 M Bis-Tris
(pH 5.7), 0.8% DTT, 8% SDS, and bromophenol blue] to maintain the
ester bond between the tRNA and the nascent chain. DIBMA samples were
boiled at 95 °C for 10 min prior to gel loading, and insoluble
DIBMA material was spun out for 2 min at the maximum microfuge speed.
To obtain the released forms of the nascent chain, the RNC samples
were treated with 10 μg of RNase A to digest the rRNA (at room
temperature for 5 min). The samples were analyzed by Western blotting
using anti-histidine and streptavidin-HRP conjugate antibodies. For
SecYEG Western blotting, an anti-SecY mouse antibody was used with
an anti-mouse HRP secondary antibody. ImageJ[42] was used for densitometry analysis where necessary. Novex Sharp
prestained protein ladder (Invitrogen) or PageRuler Plus prestained
ladder (ThermoFisher) molecular weight markers were used.It
is worth noting that DIBMA, and other polymers, are prone to smearing
when they are run on sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE) gels and transferred to nitrocellulose.
To allow the proteinaceous component to enter the acrylamide, it was
necessary to boil the samples at 95 °C for 10 min to encourage
denaturation before gel loading. The low-pH nature of the SDS loading
dye precipitated out the DIBMA as expected.RNC occupancy was
achieved through the botting of full-length GlpG
standards to produce a standard curve of blot intensity against picomoles
of GlpG (Figure S5c), against a known concentration
of RNC based on the rRNA-determined concentrations where 1 OD260 = 24 pmol/mL.[2]
Dynamic Light
Scattering
Dynamic light scattering for
DIBMA RNCs was carried out in Tico buffer in particle size mode on
a Malvern ZetaSizer machine.
Sucrose Gradient Purifications
Samples
to be purified
with a sucrose density gradient were solubilized and bound/eluted
to superaffinity Ni-NTA resin as described above. Eluates were buffer
exchanged out of imidazole using 100 kDa cutoff concentrators and
PD10 columns equilibrated with washing buffer or pelleted at 117000g for 4 h and suspended in a suitable volume of washing
buffer. Sucrose gradients were prepared with five steps of 5%, 10%,
20%, 30%, and 40% sucrose in washing buffer containing no glycerol.
The sample was layered on top and centrifuged at 202000g in a Beckmann SW40 rotor for 16 h at 4 °C before 1 mL or 500
μL fractions were taken for analysis.
Thin-Layer Chromatography
Analysis of DIBMA-Solubilized Samples
To extract lipids of
the native membrane RNCs, a modified Folch
method was used.[43] A 500 μL DIBMA-solubilized
sample was added to 1.1 mL of a 10:23:1 (v/v) CHCl3/MeOH/1
M Tris (pH 8.0) solvent and mixed well for 1 h at 25 °C. Phase
separation was then achieved by adding 1 mL of a 1:1 ChCl3/1 M Tris (pH 8.0) solvent; the mixture was vortexed, and each phase
was allowed to separate at room temperature. The upper aqueous phase
was removed, and the organic layer washed with ion switch buffer [50
mM Tris, 100 mM NaCl, and 100 mM EDTA (pH 8.0)] before being dried
under a stream of nitrogen and suspended in CHCl3 to the
desired TLC concentration.HPTLC silica gel TLC plates were
run as described in ref (44) and washed in a 1:1 CHCl3/MeOH solvent before
being air-dried. The plate was immersed in 2.3% boric acid in EtOH,
air-dried, and baked at 100 °C for 15 min. One microgram of 18:1
1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (DOPE),
18:1 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-(1′-rac-glycerol) (DOPG), and E. colicardiolipin
(all from Avanti) were spotted along with the extract samples, and
plates were run in a 65:25:4 CHCl3/MeOH/CH3COOH
solvent to achieve good headgroup separation of the lipids. The plate
was immersed in a copper char solution (10% CuSO4 and 8%
H3PO4) before air drying and further charring
at 145 °C for 15 min. Plates were imaged using blue fluorescence
once they had cooled. Alternatively, the dried plate was stained with
iodine vapor or sprayed with a molybdenum blue stain (commercial Dittmer-Lester
stain[45]) to specifically detect phospholipid.
ImageJ[42] was used for densitometry analysis,
where the raw spot intensity was converted to mole fraction, and the
percentage of total lipid composition was plotted with SD for at least
three biological repeats (new growth and preparation of RNCs, lipid
extraction, and running of TLC plates).
Growth and Preparation
of Full-Length WT NHis-GlpG
and GlpG-MycHis6
pET28a-His6-GlpG and
pET28a-GlpG-MycHis6 plasmids were transformed into C43 E. coli cells (Sigma-Aldrich). Seven milliliters of an overnight-saturated
culture was added to 1 L of LB culture, both with 30 μg/mL kanamycin.
These cultures were grown at 37 °C until an OD of 0.6–0.8
was achieved. The cultures were then cooled to 16 °C, induced
with 1 mM IPTG, and left overnight before the cells were harvested.
The cells were washed with PBS and either stored at −80 °C
or used immediately.Cell pellets were thawed and resuspended
in buffer A [300 mM sodium chloride and 20 mM 2-amino-2-hydroxymethylpropane-1,3-diol
(Tris) (pH 7.4) at room temperature] supplemented with a cOmplete
protease inhibitor tablet (Roche), PMSF, Benzonase nuclease, and 5
mM β-mercaptoethanol (β-ME).The cell suspension
was passed twice through a microfluidizer (Constant
Systems) at 25000 psi. Insoluble material was pelleted by centrifugation
twice at 20000g for 25 min at 4 °C. Membranes
were pelleted by centrifugation at 150000g for 1.5
h at 4 °C.Membranes were resuspended at a concentration
of 40 mg/mL in ice-cold
buffer B [500 mM sodium chloride, 10% glycerol, and 50 mM Tris (pH
7.4) at room temperature] supplemented with a cOmplete protease inhibitor
tablet (Roche) and PMSF and homogenized using a Potter-Elvehjem Teflon
pestle and glass tube.DDM was added to the suspension at a
final concentration of 1%
(w/v) to solubilize the membranes. The cell suspension with DDM was
incubated overnight with gentle agitation at 4 °C, followed by
centrifugation at 100000g for 1 h at 4 °C.The supernatant was then filtered before being loaded onto a 1
mL HisTrap column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated in buffer B [500 mM
sodium chloride, 20 mM imidazole, 10% (v/v) glycerol, 50 mM Tris (pH
7.4) at room temperature, and 0.025% (w/v) DDM].The column
was washed with 10 mL of buffer B and then 20 mL of
5% buffer C [500 mM sodium chloride, 500 mM imidazole, 10% (v/v) glycerol,
50 mM Tris (pH 7.4) at room temperature, and 0.025% (w/v) DDM].GlpG was eluted with 100% buffer C and injected directly onto a
Superdex 75 10/600 GL size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) column (GE
Healthcare) equilibrated in buffer D [50 mM Tris (pH 7.4) at room
temperature, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, and 0.025% (w/v) DDM]. Peak
fractions that eluted from the SEC column containing GlpG were pooled
and spin filtered before being flash-frozen and stored at −80
or −20 °C. SDS–PAGE and Western blotting, with
an anti-histidine antibody, were used to assess GlpG purification.
EnzCheck Protease Activity Assay for GlpG
Detailed
GlpG activity assay methods can be found in refs (21) and (46). Briefly, 5 μg/mL
EnzCheck BODIPY-Casein substrate (ThermoScientific) was cleaved by
1 mg/mL GlpG overnight and in the dark at 4 °C in GlpG purification
buffer D (see above). The resulting fluorescence that was emitted
at 510 nm upon excitation with 480 nm light was recorded on a Horiba
Fluoromax 4 instrument. This was a measure of the reduction of the
level of self-quenching of BODIPY as casein is cleaved, indicative
of GlpG protease activity. GlpG’s activity was inhibited with
the addition of 100 μM diisopropyl fluorophosphate (DFP).
Growth and Preparation of SecYEG
pBAD SecYEG was transformed
into C43 cells and maintained with 100 μg/mL ampicillin. Overnight
cultures of transformed cells were grown at 37 °C and used to
seed 3 L of LB medium containing 100 μg/mL ampicillin. Cells
were induced with 0.1% l-arabinose and grown until saturation
was achieved. SecE (containing a C-terminal His6 tag) is
under the control of an arabinose promoter, and therefore, no IPTG
is required for induction. Cells were harvested and suspended in 1×
PBS with a cOmplete protease inhibitor tablet and stored at −20
°C until the day of use.Cells were defrosted slowly and
incubated with Benzonase nuclease before lysis using a constant systems
cell disruptor at 25000 psi. The membrane fraction was harvested at
150000g and solubilized in 20 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 300
mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 0.1 mM PMSF, 2% DDM, 20 mM imidazole, and an
EDTA-free protease inhibitor tablet for 2 h at 4 °C. Insoluble
material was removed with a 100000g centrifugation
step, and the supernatant was loaded directly onto an AKTA Pure purification
system.The sample was passed over a Ni-NTA column at a rate
of 0.5 mL/min
for affinity purification of the SecYEG using a six-His tag. The trap
was washed with 30 mL of the buffer described above before elution
in 20 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 300 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 0.2 mM PMSF, 0.1%
DDM, 1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, and 500 mM imidazole. The eluate was
immediately passed over a Superdex 16/600 column in 20 mM Tris (pH
8.0), 300 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 0.1 mM PMSF, and 0.1% DDM. Peak fractions
were collected and concentrated using a 100 kDa concentrator if necessary
and subsequently snap-frozen and stored at −70 °C until
use.
Results and Discussion
A Strategy for the Preparation of Polytopic
α-Helical
Protein RNCs
The E. coli rhomboid protease
GlpG was used to benchmark our strategies for RNC generation. GlpG
has six transmembrane-spanning α-helices and an N-terminal α-helix/β-sheet
structured domain housing its catalytic dyad (denoted CytD), separated
from the TM domain by a flexible linker, L. High-resolution structures of each domain exist, but not that of
the full-length protein.[47−49]GlpG has become a model
membrane protein for in vitro folding and stability
work[21,38] and has been interrogated by chaotrope,[50] heating,[51] steric
trapping,[52] or mechanical force.[53] These systems, however, do not truly represent
the in vivo folding situation whereby mRNA is translated
by the ribosome and protein forms and folds during chain elongation
in unison with translation. More recently, surface-enhanced infrared
absorption spectroscopy (SEIRAS) and IVTT systems were used to determine
secondary structure folding of the GlpG nascent chain as it was translated
by the ribosome and inserted into translocon-free MSP-based lipid
nanodiscs.[20,21] This allowed time-resolved analysis
of co-translational folding of GlpG for the first time but nonetheless
lacked a native membrane lipid environment.GlpG RNCs of varying
nascent chain lengths were generated in vivo using
the SecM stalling motif (150FSTPVWISQAQGIRAGP166). An E. coli SecM arrest sequence[9,24] was cloned downstream of two, four, and six predicted TM helices
(see Materials and Methods). Stalling positions
were chosen on the basis of translocon-mediated MPEx hydropathy analysis[27] (Figure a,b), which describes the free energy required for a stretch
of amino acids to partition into the membrane environment, taking
into account not only the identity of the amino acid but also the
TM segment length and the influence of flanking amino acids. To allow
all TM regions of interest to be fully translated, the length of the
ribosome tunnel was also taken into account, which has been approximated
to accommodate ∼40 fully extended amino acids.[54] Hence, the final Pro166 stalling residue and
the C-terminal end of the TM of interest were separated by 44 amino
acids (including the SecM motif and linker residues).
Figure 1
Construct design of GlpG
RNCs at different co-translational “intermediates”.
(a) PDB structure of WT GlpG: TM region, with helices 1 and 2 colored
green, helices 3 and 4 colored orange, and helices 5 and 6 colored
purple (PDB entry 2XTV(49)) and the cytoplasmic domain (CytD)
colored blue (PDB entry 2LEP(48)). (b) MPEx[27] translocon TM predicted hydropathy plot for
full-length GlpG with linker-WT SecM. A sliding scale length (L) of 19–23 amino acids was used for MPEx hydropathy
prediction. Arrows depict the position chosen for the 3′ cloning
of linker-WT SecM. This provides 44 amino acid residues between a
stable TM helix and the SecM Pro166 stalling residue. (c)
Construct design for RNC truncations of GlpG. WT SecM was cloned to
the C-terminus of each construct (red). A six-histidine tag was cloned
to the N-terminus of the construct. An additional Avi tag (purple)
could also be cloned and successfully utilized for in vivo biotinylation if desired (see the Supporting Information). The color scheme for GlpG constructs is consistent
with panel a.
Construct design of GlpG
RNCs at different co-translational “intermediates”.
(a) PDB structure of WT GlpG: TM region, with helices 1 and 2 colored
green, helices 3 and 4 colored orange, and helices 5 and 6 colored
purple (PDB entry 2XTV(49)) and the cytoplasmic domain (CytD)
colored blue (PDB entry 2LEP(48)). (b) MPEx[27] translocon TM predicted hydropathy plot for
full-length GlpG with linker-WT SecM. A sliding scale length (L) of 19–23 amino acids was used for MPEx hydropathy
prediction. Arrows depict the position chosen for the 3′ cloning
of linker-WT SecM. This provides 44 amino acid residues between a
stable TM helix and the SecM Pro166 stalling residue. (c)
Construct design for RNC truncations of GlpG. WT SecM was cloned to
the C-terminus of each construct (red). A six-histidine tag was cloned
to the N-terminus of the construct. An additional Avi tag (purple)
could also be cloned and successfully utilized for in vivo biotinylation if desired (see the Supporting Information). The color scheme for GlpG constructs is consistent
with panel a.To facilitate purification of in vivo-generated
RNCs, a six-histidine affinity tag (His tag) was placed at the N-terminus
of GlpG (Figure c).
The introduction of the N-terminal tag did not affect protease activity
when compared to a C-terminal construct (Figure S2a), or sorting to the membrane, and overexpression of these
RNC constructs was found to be nontoxic to BL21E. coli expression cells (Figure S2b). Additionally,
we establish that in vivo biotinylation of the membrane
protein nascent chain can be achieved through the incorporation of
an Avi tag (see the Supporting Information and Figure S1). This expands the capability of our constructs for
purification by biotin/avidin affinity chromatography and/or advanced
biophysical interrogation.[29,30]To assess the
ability of the designed constructs to generate membrane
protein RNCs, they were initially purified in detergent micelles following
cell growth in both minimal and Luria-Bertani media. Cell membranes
containing overexpressed GlpG RNCs were isolated and solubilized with n-dodecyl β-d-maltoside (DDM) detergent before
purification with immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC)
and size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) (Figure a). Stalled nascent chains can be characterized
by low-pH SDS–PAGE analysis, which preserves the nascent chain–tRNA
ester bond supplying an increased shift in mass and a reduced rate
of migration.[2] RNase A treatment digests
the bound tRNA, leaving the stalled polypeptide. All three RNC constructs
(two-, four-, and six-TM GlpG) eluted as two resolved peaks upon SEC
(Figure a and Figure S2d); the void peak (V0) was found to contain aggregates of the released nascent
chain (observed by Western blotting) and aggregated 70S ribosomes
(observed by Coomassie staining ) (Figure d and Figure S2c). The major elution peak at ∼60 mL contained homogeneous
GlpG RNCs as confirmed by low-pH SDS–PAGE and Western blotting
(Figure b,c), with
an A260/A280 ratio of ∼2.1 signifying the presence of homogeneous 70S
ribosomes.[41] This purification strategy
is faster than sucrose gradient preparations commonly used for RNC
preparations,[2] with the shorter purification
time being preferable for maintaining the integrity of membrane protein
samples in detergent micelles.[55] However,
the RNC constructs were also amenable to sucrose gradient purification
post-IMAC (Figure S2e).
Figure 2
Purification of GlpG
RNCs in DDM detergent micelles. (a) Representative
SEC trace showing void and elution peaks at ∼60 mL for four-TM
GlpG RNC. (b) DDM-solubilized GlpG RNCs were purified using IMAC followed
by SEC using a 16/60 HiPrep Sephacryl S-400 column. Low-pH SDS–PAGE
and Western blotting analysis of fractions under major elution peak
show stalled ribosome complex before (−) and after (+) RNase
A treatment [tRNA-GlpG and GlpG nascent chain (NC)-labeled bands respectively];
the stall is confirmed by a decrease in molecular weight as tRNA is
digested. The size of these bands increases as the protein increases
by two TM helices with each stall. (c) SDS–PAGE of fractions
under the elution peak in panel a, showing characteristic 70S ribosome
protein bands: the 30S S1 protein at ∼65 kDa, the 50S L2 protein
at ∼30 kDa, and a selection of other ribosomal proteins below
30 kDa after Coomassie staining.[56] (d)
Western blot analysis of a void peak from a four-TM GlpG RNC preparation
in the DDM detergent. This peak appears to contain aggregated, released
nascent chain. All Western blots were probed using a polyhistidine-HRP
antibody.
Purification of GlpG
RNCs in DDM detergent micelles. (a) Representative
SEC trace showing void and elution peaks at ∼60 mL for four-TM
GlpG RNC. (b) DDM-solubilized GlpG RNCs were purified using IMAC followed
by SEC using a 16/60 HiPrepSephacryl S-400 column. Low-pH SDS–PAGE
and Western blotting analysis of fractions under major elution peak
show stalled ribosome complex before (−) and after (+) RNase
A treatment [tRNA-GlpG and GlpG nascent chain (NC)-labeled bands respectively];
the stall is confirmed by a decrease in molecular weight as tRNA is
digested. The size of these bands increases as the protein increases
by two TM helices with each stall. (c) SDS–PAGE of fractions
under the elution peak in panel a, showing characteristic 70S ribosome
protein bands: the 30S S1 protein at ∼65 kDa, the 50S L2 protein
at ∼30 kDa, and a selection of other ribosomal proteins below
30 kDa after Coomassie staining.[56] (d)
Western blot analysis of a void peak from a four-TM GlpG RNC preparation
in the DDM detergent. This peak appears to contain aggregated, released
nascent chain. All Western blots were probed using a polyhistidine-HRP
antibody.Low-intensity bands underneath
the major GlpG construct bands were
observed by Western blotting and attributed to small populations of
truncated GlpG. This is commonly observed within preparations of RNCs
by SecM-based stalling,[1,57] caused by digestion with remaining
proteases during purification. Notably, when the GlpG constructs were
released from the ribosome, they became more prone to degradation,
suggesting that the constructs are stabilized and/or protected by
the ribosome to protease digestion (Figure b).Yields of RNC varied between nascent
chain lengths when overexpressed
and purified under identical conditions. Purified yields for the two-,
four-, and six-TM constructs were ∼30, 100, and 25 pmol/mL,
respectively, based on the rRNA (A260)
content and assuming 100% ribosome/NC occupancy in DDM detergent.
The individual yields may be linked to the extent of expected membrane
force pulling of the different nascent chain lengths,[16,17,26] with an increased “insertion
force” of some sequences reducing the stalling effect of SecM
and in turn the quantity of stable RNCs obtained. MPEx analysis indicates
that the four-TM construct is preceded by TM regions TM3 and TM4 that
have the least favorable insertion energetics (Figure b). As a result, SecM stalling is effective
and this is the highest-yield construct. On the contrary, the two-
and six-TM constructs are preceded by TMs with much more favorable
insertion energetics (lower-energy minima), which may lead to decreased
RNC stalling stability and, therefore, the reduced yields observed.The yields achieved for GlpG RNCs are sufficient for further structural
and biochemical analyses but are around 100-fold lower than those
previously quoted for small globular protein RNCs by Cabrita et al.[2] This is likely due to the toxic nature of overexpressing
membrane proteins, caused in part by saturation of available SecYEG
translocons.[58] Indeed, GlpG has been shown
to insert into the E. coli inner membrane using SecYEG
and YidC;[59] however, details of these interactions
are currently unknown.[60]
Capturing Membrane
Protein RNCs within DIBMA Nanodiscs
To capture RNCs in a
native lipid surrounding, GlpG RNCs with two,
four, and six TMs were isolated with DIBMA using a protocol similar
to that for DDM but with some important modifications (Figure a and Figure S3ab). Isolated membranes were solubilized using DIBMA, which
has a lower solubilization efficiency compared to that of the DDM
detergent and SMAco-polymer. Higher divalent cation concentrations
(in the presence of 10 mM Mg2+ or 7.5 mM Ca2+) have been shown to improve DIBMA-meditated solubilization of E. coli membranes by up to 2-fold, through association and
neutralization of the polymer’s carboxylate groups.[35] To this end, the magnesium acetate concentration
was increased in our membrane solubilization buffers from 6 to 12
mM. Solubilized membranes containing His-tagged GlpG RNCs were then
batch bound to superaffinity Ni-NTA beads overnight at 4 °C to
allow nickel–histidine coordination. This step was necessary
as we found that DIBMA could interfere with nickel–histidine
coordination,[9,10] reducing the level of the binding
of the His tag to the Ni2+ resin; in contrast, DDM detergent
preparations did not require long incubation times for adequate binding
to occur.
Figure 3
Preparation of GlpG RNCs in DIBMA nanodiscs shows evidence of co-purification
with SecYEG. (a) Schematic of RNC DIBMA nanodisc preparation. E. coli inner membranes packed with membrane protein RNCs
were subject to DIBMA solubilization to produce homogeneous RNC nanodiscs
containing a native lipid environment. (b) GlpG RNC samples were solubilized
with the DIBMA co-polymer and RNC DIBMA nanodiscs purified using IMAC
followed by SEC. Arginine (0.2 M) was added to the SEC mobile phase
to reduce the level of nonspecific aggregation of DIBMA nanodiscs
with the resin of the 16/60 HiPrep Sephacryl S-400 size-exclusion
column. Low-pH SDS–PAGE and Western blot analysis were used
to assess the three RNC lengths from DIBMA preparations. Intact DIBMA-solubilized
RNCs (pre-RNase A) for each stall length (two, four, and six TMs)
are highlighted by pink boxes; released GlpG nascent chains due to
RNase A treatment (+) are boxed in purple. Any unlabeled bands are
identified as released, truncated, or aggregated GlpG caused by arginine-facilitated
migration of the void peak into the SEC elution peak (see Figure S3c). All Western blots were probed using
a polyhistidine-HRP antibody. (c) Evidence of endogenous SecYEG was
detected within GlpG RNC samples prepared in the DDM detergent and
DIBMA nanodiscs. Endogenous SecY was found to be present in samples
before (−) and after (+) RNase A treatment (highlighted with
a pink box, left panel). The low-molecular weight SecY band is characteristic
of a C-terminal cleavage product.[62] Its
37 kDa band was confirmed by comparison with a Western blot (middle
panel) and SDS–PAGE (right panel) of purified SecYEG, SecE
and SecG co-migrating in this SDS–PAGE environment. All Western
blots were probed using a monoclonal antibody for SecY.
Preparation of GlpG RNCs in DIBMA nanodiscs shows evidence of co-purification
with SecYEG. (a) Schematic of RNC DIBMA nanodisc preparation. E. coli inner membranes packed with membrane protein RNCs
were subject to DIBMA solubilization to produce homogeneous RNC nanodiscs
containing a native lipid environment. (b) GlpG RNC samples were solubilized
with the DIBMA co-polymer and RNC DIBMA nanodiscs purified using IMAC
followed by SEC. Arginine (0.2 M) was added to the SEC mobile phase
to reduce the level of nonspecific aggregation of DIBMA nanodiscs
with the resin of the 16/60 HiPrepSephacryl S-400 size-exclusion
column. Low-pH SDS–PAGE and Western blot analysis were used
to assess the three RNC lengths from DIBMA preparations. Intact DIBMA-solubilized
RNCs (pre-RNase A) for each stall length (two, four, and six TMs)
are highlighted by pink boxes; released GlpG nascent chains due to
RNase A treatment (+) are boxed in purple. Any unlabeled bands are
identified as released, truncated, or aggregated GlpG caused by arginine-facilitated
migration of the void peak into the SEC elution peak (see Figure S3c). All Western blots were probed using
a polyhistidine-HRP antibody. (c) Evidence of endogenous SecYEG was
detected within GlpG RNC samples prepared in the DDM detergent and
DIBMA nanodiscs. Endogenous SecY was found to be present in samples
before (−) and after (+) RNase A treatment (highlighted with
a pink box, left panel). The low-molecular weight SecY band is characteristic
of a C-terminal cleavage product.[62] Its
37 kDa band was confirmed by comparison with a Western blot (middle
panel) and SDS–PAGE (right panel) of purified SecYEG, SecE
and SecG co-migrating in this SDS–PAGE environment. All Western
blots were probed using a monoclonal antibody for SecY.Dynamic light scattering was used to assess the size and
homogeneity
of solubilized, IMAC-purified four-TM GlpG RNCs and gave a mean peak
size of 10.5 nm, which is close to the value of 12.7 nm previously
reported for full-length GlpG in DIBMA.[38] The average particle size z (which is the intensity-weighted
mean hydrodynamic size of the ensemble) was determined to be 33.0
nm, suggestive of populations of ribosome-bound and unbound discs
causing sample polydispersity (Figure S3d).Affinity-purified DIBMA-solubilized GlpG RNCs were then
subjected
to SEC for further purification from protein-free DIBMA discs, released
nascent chains, and aggregated RNCs. However, during SEC, the DIBMApolymer was found to interact with the Sephacryl S400 resin, which
prevented its elution from the column. To counter this, 0.2 M arginine
was added to the SEC buffer mobile phase to mitigate interactions
of the protein disc with the resin and eliminate possible aggregation[61] (Figure S3c). With
arginine present, the DIBMA nanodisc samples could now be resolved
by SEC but with an elution behavior different from that found within
DDM detergent preparations: the void peak disappeared, and the major
peak shifted to a larger elution volume (Figure S3c). 70S ribosomal controls in the presence and absence of
arginine in SEC buffer showed that this shift was caused by arginine,
while the A260/A280 ratios were unaffected.Low-pH SDS–PAGE and
Western blotting analysis showed that
two-, four-, and six-TM RNCs within DIBMA nanodiscs (pink box) were
successfully obtained (Figure b). However, the Western blot shows an increased rate of nascent
chain release (purple box), particularly in the two-TM GlpG RNC, even
before treatment with RNase A. We suggest these bands are released
nascent chain, previously found as aggregates in the void peak in
DDM preparations, which migrate into the major elution peak during
SEC, which is caused by the inclusion of arginine in the mobile phase
(Figure b and Figure S3c).Sucrose gradients, employing
a continuous 5 to 50% gradient, were
used to eradicate released nascent chain artifacts caused by SEC arginine
preparation of RNC DIBMA nanodiscs following IMAC purification (see Materials and Methods). The increased density of
the lipid discs results in DIBMA nanodisc samples residing in the
bottom fifth of the sucrose layer (Figure S3e), as has been shown previously for membrane-associated RNCs,[57] providing pure and homogeneous samples. This supports the idea
that sucrose gradient purification is also a viable purification strategy
for RNC DIBMA nanodisc samples (DIBMA samples being more stable than
those in DDM).
The Endogenous SecYEG Translocon Associates
with GlpG RNCs
To explore whether any SecYEG remained associated
with GlpG RNCS,
we probed the four-TM GlpG RNC purified in DDM and DIBMA nanodiscs
for the presence of any endogenous Sec translocase machinery using
a monoclonal SecY antibody.[62] SDS–PAGE
and Western blot analysis revealed the presence of endogenous SecY
(which has a blot intensity that is lower than that of overexpressed
RNC) within both DDM and DIBMA samples (Figure c). This co-purification of SecY supports
the idea that a GlpG RNC, Sec translocase interaction in vivo is maintained upon isolation in DDM or DIBMA.
DIBMA Captures
Membrane Protein RNCs within a Native Lipid Environment
To
ensure that the DIBMA polymer had solubilized GlpG RNCs within
a native lipid environment, we assessed the lipid compositions using
high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC). Purified RNC DIBMA
nanodisc samples and cell membranes from non-induced cells, grown
at the same temperature, were subject to Folch lipid extraction. The
lipid identity and relative mole ratio of each observed lipid were
then assessed using HPTLC analysis (Figure ). The three major phospholipid types expected
within the E. coli inner membrane are phosphatidylethanolamine
(PE), phosphatidylglycerol (PG), and cardiolipin (CL). We found that
all DIBMA GlpG RNC nanodiscs contained similar relative abundances
of PE, PG, and CL and compared to the non-induced membrane extract
when grown in MDG/EM9 media (Figure ).
Figure 4
GlpG RNCs prepared in DIBMA nanodiscs contain native lipid
compositions.
DIBMA GlpG RNC samples and cell membranes, prepared from BL21 E. coli cells grown in minimal media, were subjected to
Folch lipid extraction. Extractions were run alongside standards of
DOPE, DOPG, and CL. A representative TLC plate from samples grown
in MDG/EM9 media is shown. The three bar charts show a similar relative
abundance of each lipid for each stall length (the 2 TM label denotes
two-TM GlpG RNC extraction) as determined using densitometry analysis.
The mean percent lipid composition and SD are plotted for three or
more biological repeats for each stall length (see Materials and Methods). Phospholipid headgroups for phosphatidylethanolamine
(PE), phosphatidylglycerol (PG), and cardiolipin (CL) are shown.
GlpG RNCs prepared in DIBMA nanodiscs contain native lipid
compositions.
DIBMA GlpG RNC samples and cell membranes, prepared from BL21E. coli cells grown in minimal media, were subjected to
Folch lipid extraction. Extractions were run alongside standards of
DOPE, DOPG, and CL. A representative TLC plate from samples grown
in MDG/EM9 media is shown. The three bar charts show a similar relative
abundance of each lipid for each stall length (the 2 TM label denotes
two-TM GlpG RNC extraction) as determined using densitometry analysis.
The mean percent lipid composition and SD are plotted for three or
more biological repeats for each stall length (see Materials and Methods). Phospholipid headgroups for phosphatidylethanolamine
(PE), phosphatidylglycerol (PG), and cardiolipin (CL) are shown.A small increase in the abundance of PE and a decrease
in the abundance
of CL were seen between uninduced BL21 cells and the GlpG RNC DIBMA
preparations (especially for the two-TM GlpG construct). Lipid membrane
solubilization by DIBMA is relatively unexplored, but these effects
may arise from collision lipid transfer[63] or preferential solubilization by DIBMA or reflect the two-TM local
lipid environment as previously shown with SMA.[64] When RNCs were grown in LB medium, neutral lipids were
also found in addition to the expected phospholipid composition (Figure S4), as confirmed by iodine vapor and
molybdenum blue staining.[45] This has also
previously been observed in DIBMA nanodiscs of full-length GlpG.[38]Taken together, we observed that DIBMA
is capable of extracting
MP RNCs within a composition akin to its native lipid bilayer.
An Enhanced
SecM Arrest Sequence Dramatically Improves Membrane
Protein RNC Stability
An enhanced arrest sequence (AE1) (150FSTPVWIWWWPRIRAPP166)[26] was employed to improve the stability of RNCs
and mitigate the release of the nascent chain during and after purification,
thus enhancing RNC quality and longevity. Compared to WT SecM, the
AE1 SecM sequence contains an additional proline at position 165 and
a substituted stretch of tryptophan amino acids (Figure a), which forms more interactions
with the ribosome exit tunnel and further occludes peptide bond formation
in the PTC.[4]
Figure 5
Arrest-enhanced SecM
provides yields MP RNCs with greater stability,
occupancy, and purity. (a) AE1 SecM sequence, with residues differing
from the WT SecM sequence colored orange. (b) Low-pH SDS–PAGE
and Western blotting analysis show that the AE1 RNC constructs are
consistent with WT SecM for four-TM GlpG in both DDM and DIBMA, but
the degree of spontaneously released nascent chain is significantly
reduced (see Figures a and 3b). (c) AE1 SecM GlpG four-TM RNCs
purified in DIBMA nanodiscs were heated at 23 and 37 °C for 24
h. Samples were taken and blotted after 1, 2, 4, and 24 h before low-pH
SDS–PAGE and Western blotting analysis. The ratio between intact
RNC (∼50 kDa band, tRNA-GlpG 4 TM) and spontaneously released
nascent chain (∼30 kDa band, GlpG 4 TM) was calculated for
each lane using the band density and ImageJ.[42] Percentages of intact and released are quoted next to the corresponding
band. There was no significant release for each temperature from 1
to 24 h.
Arrest-enhanced SecM
provides yields MP RNCs with greater stability,
occupancy, and purity. (a) AE1 SecM sequence, with residues differing
from the WT SecM sequence colored orange. (b) Low-pH SDS–PAGE
and Western blotting analysis show that the AE1 RNC constructs are
consistent with WT SecM for four-TM GlpG in both DDM and DIBMA, but
the degree of spontaneously released nascent chain is significantly
reduced (see Figures a and 3b). (c) AE1 SecM GlpG four-TM RNCs
purified in DIBMA nanodiscs were heated at 23 and 37 °C for 24
h. Samples were taken and blotted after 1, 2, 4, and 24 h before low-pH
SDS–PAGE and Western blotting analysis. The ratio between intact
RNC (∼50 kDa band, tRNA-GlpG 4 TM) and spontaneously released
nascent chain (∼30 kDa band, GlpG 4 TM) was calculated for
each lane using the band density and ImageJ.[42] Percentages of intact and released are quoted next to the corresponding
band. There was no significant release for each temperature from 1
to 24 h.Four-TM GlpG RNCs were prepared
with the AE1 SecM stalling sequence
in both DDM micelles and DIBMA nanodiscs, yielding samples of a quality
higher than that achieved with WT SecM, as evidenced by negligible
nascent chain release and degradation observed by Western blotting
(Figure b). Improved
nascent chain retention was also found for AE1 SecM RNCs, with only
12% spontaneous release of nascent chain from AE1 SecM RNCs observed
over 24 h at 23 °C, compared to 35% for WT SecM, for DDM purified
samples under the same conditions (IMAC and SEC purification) (Figure S5a). These percentages were estimated
by using densitometry analysis at each time point and calculating
the relative ratios of tRNA-bound four-TM GlpG and naturally released
four-TM nascent chain. Moreover, four-TM GlpG RNCs containing WT SecM
released 48% of their nascent chain upon only one freeze–thaw
cycle, whereas AE1 SecM released only 18% (Figure S5c).Four-TM GlpG AE1 SecM RNCs, prepared in DIBMA (by
IMAC and sucrose
gradient purification), were incredibly stable; no significant release
was found after 24 h at both 23 and 37 °C (Figure c). Furthermore, these samples were able
to withstand at least six freeze–thaw cycles with no significant
release of the nascent chain (Figure S5b).We also estimated the fraction of ribosomes in the samples
that
contain bound nascent chain to understand purified RNC occupancy.
Occupancy was calculated by blotting the known A260-derived concentration of each RNC sample (where 1 A260 = 24 pmol/mL) against full-length GlpG standards
(Figure S5c) and calculating the picomoles
of GlpG NC for the tRNA-bound band.[2] There
was an increase in occupancy of AE1 SecM RNCs in DDM (85% occupancy)
compared to that of WT SecM RNC (75% occupancy). An occupancy of 75%
was determined for AE1 SecM RNC in DIBMA; however, there is no significant
release of this DIBMA nascent chain compared to that of DDM detergent
samples (Figure S5c). This signifies that
incorporation of the AE1 sequence leads to a significant increase
in RNC stability, which will aid future structural, biochemical, and
biophysical analysis.
Conclusions
We
demonstrate that pure, stable RNCs of different nascent chain
lengths can be prepared for a polytopic α-helical integral membrane
protein, in both detergent micelle and native lipid surroundings.
This work advances membrane protein RNC preparations by establishing
that (1) SecM stalling can successfully stall a polytopic α-helical
MP at various points throughout its synthesis to yield stable RNCs
for structural interrogation, thus allowing folding of the full chain
to be probed as opposed to single, short TM constructs previously
investigated, (2) RNC constructs are tolerant to different purification
tags, such as His and Avi tags, enabling diverse purification and
experimental strategies to be devised, (3) the nascent chain is maintained
within a lipid bilayer comprised of its cellular lipid mixtures rather
than synthetic lipids, and (4) RNCs are extracted directly from native
membranes, escaping reconstitution of isolated RNCs prepared in non-native
environments and permitting co-purification of endogenous chaperones,
such as the SecYEG translocon.Overall, we reveal that homogeneous
membrane protein RNCs can be
captured within a native lipid environment using DIBMA native nanodisc
technology. These samples are stable for the time frames and conditions
required for future biochemical and structural studies.[65,66]In vivo-formed membrane protein RNCs generated
here provide snapshots of co-translational folding, paused at various
nascent chain lengths, and are a stepping stone toward studying the
structure and dynamics of co-translational membrane protein folding
in an increasingly more in vivo context.
Authors: Mayuriben Parmar; Shaun Rawson; Charlotte A Scarff; Adrian Goldman; Timothy R Dafforn; Stephen P Muench; Vincent L G Postis Journal: Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr Date: 2017-10-06 Impact factor: 3.747
Authors: Lucas Unger; Alejandro Ronco-Campaña; Philip Kitchen; Roslyn M Bill; Alice J Rothnie Journal: Biochem Soc Trans Date: 2021-06-30 Impact factor: 5.407