Literature DB >> 32166602

Asymmetry and Microstructure of Temporal-Suppression Patterns in Basilar-Membrane Responses to Clicks: Relation to Tonal Suppression and Traveling-Wave Dispersion.

Karolina K Charaziak1, Wei Dong2,3, Alessandro Altoè4, Christopher A Shera4,5.   

Abstract

The cochlea's wave-based signal processing allows it to efficiently decompose a complex acoustic waveform into frequency components. Because cochlear responses are nonlinear, the waves arising from one frequency component of a complex sound can be altered by the presence of others that overlap with it in time and space (e.g., two-tone suppression). Here, we investigate the suppression of basilar-membrane (BM) velocity responses to a transient signal (a test click) by another click or tone. We show that the BM response to the click can be reduced when the stimulus is shortly preceded or followed by another (suppressor) click. More surprisingly, the data reveal two curious dependencies on the interclick interval, Δt. First, the temporal suppression curve (amount of suppression vs. Δt) manifests a pronounced and nearly periodic microstructure. Second, temporal suppression is generally strongest not when the two clicks are presented simultaneously (Δt = 0), but when the suppressor click precedes the test click by a time interval corresponding to one to two periods of the best frequency (BF) at the measurement location. By systematically varying the phase of the suppressor click, we demonstrate that the suppression microstructure arises from alternating constructive and destructive interference between the BM responses to the two clicks. And by comparing temporal and tonal suppression in the same animals, we test the hypothesis that the asymmetry of the temporal-suppression curve around Δt = 0 stems from cochlear dispersion and the well-known asymmetry of tonal suppression around the BF. Just as for two-tone suppression, BM responses to clicks are most suppressed by tones at frequencies just above the BF of the measurement location. On average, the frequency place of maximal suppressibility of the click response predicted from temporal-suppression data agrees with the frequency at which tonal suppression peaks, consistent with our hypothesis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  basilar membrane; click-on-click; cochlear mechanics; gerbil; suppression; temporal suppression; tone-on-click suppression

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32166602      PMCID: PMC7270478          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-020-00747-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  56 in total

1.  Nonlinear temporal interactions in click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. II. Experimental data.

Authors:  S Kapadia; M E Lutman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Cochlear gain control.

Authors:  Marcel van der Heijden
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Mutual suppression in the 6 kHz region of sensitive chinchilla cochleae.

Authors:  William S Rhode
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Temporal suppression and augmentation of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Sarah Verhulst; James M Harte; Torsten Dau
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Detection of cochlear amplification and its activation.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Harmonic distortion on the basilar membrane in the basal turn of the guinea-pig cochlea.

Authors:  N P Cooper
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Nonlinear time-domain cochlear model for transient stimulation and human otoacoustic emission.

Authors:  Sarah Verhulst; Torsten Dau; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Dynamics of Cochlear Nonlinearity.

Authors:  Nigel P Cooper; Marcel van der Heijden
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

9.  Time-domain measurements of cochlear nonlinearities using combination click stimuli.

Authors:  T J Goblick; R R Pfeiffer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1969-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The spatial buildup of compression and suppression in the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  Corstiaen P C Versteegh; Marcel van der Heijden
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-05-21
View more
  3 in total

1.  The Elusive Cochlear Filter: Wave Origin of Cochlear Cross-Frequency Masking.

Authors:  Alessandro Altoè; Karolina K Charaziak; James B Dewey; Arturo Moleti; Renata Sisto; John S Oghalai; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-10-22

2.  Envelope following responses predict speech-in-noise performance in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Anita M Mepani; Sarah Verhulst; Kenneth E Hancock; Markus Garrett; Viacheslav Vasilkov; Kara Bennett; Victor de Gruttola; M Charles Liberman; Stéphane F Maison
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Reflection-Source Emissions Evoked with Clicks and Frequency Sweeps: Comparisons Across Levels.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-10-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.