Literature DB >> 9547400

Harmonic distortion on the basilar membrane in the basal turn of the guinea-pig cochlea.

N P Cooper1.   

Abstract

1. Mechanical responses to pure-tone stimuli were recorded from the basilar membrane in the basal turn of the guinea-pig cochlea using a displacement-sensitive laser interferometer. The harmonic content of the responses was evaluated using Fourier analysis. 2. Harmonic distortion products were observed in many of the basilar membrane responses. Response components locked to twice the frequency of the stimulus (i.e. 2F0) were the largest of the distortion products. 3. The second harmonic responses showed a bimodal frequency distribution at low to moderate sound pressure levels: one peak occurred around the preparation's best or most sensitive frequency (i.e. when F0 approximately 17 kHz), and another occurred around one-half of the best frequency (when F0 approximately 8.5 kHz). 4. The absolute levels of most distortion products increased progressively with increasing stimulus strength. When expressed with respect to the levels of the fundamental responses, however, the distortion levels usually decreased with increasing stimulus strength. 5. The levels of the distortion decreased (in both absolute and relative terms) with deterioration in the physiological condition of the cochlea. 6. Maximum second harmonic distortion levels amounted to approximately 3.5 and approximately 28 % of the fundamental responses to tones near and below the best frequency, respectively. 7. The above findings are shown to be consistent with a highly simplified model of cochlear mechanics which incorporates an asymmetric, saturating non-linearity in a positive feedback loop.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9547400      PMCID: PMC2230936          DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.277bo.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  35 in total

Review 1.  The active cochlea.

Authors:  P Dallos
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Outer hair cell electromotility: the sensitivity and vulnerability of the DC component.

Authors:  B N Evans; R Hallworth; P Dallos
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Two-tone suppression in cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  N P Cooper
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Extracochlear electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions: a model for in vivo assessment of outer hair cell electromotility.

Authors:  T Ren; A L Nuttall
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Biophysics of the cochlea. II: Stationary nonlinear phenomenology.

Authors:  R Nobili; F Mammano
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Steady-state sinusoidal velocity responses of the basilar membrane in guinea pig.

Authors:  A L Nuttall; D F Dolan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea.

Authors:  M A Ruggero; N C Rich; A Recio; S S Narayan; L Robles
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  A cochlear model using feed-forward outer-hair-cell forces.

Authors:  C D Geisler; C Sang
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Harmonics of outer hair cell motility.

Authors:  J Santos-Sacchi
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Mechano-electrical transducer currents in hair cells of the cultured neonatal mouse cochlea.

Authors:  C J Kros; A Rüsch; G P Richardson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1992-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  Sound-induced motions of individual cochlear hair bundles.

Authors:  A J Aranyosi; Dennis M Freeman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-08-17       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Response to a pure tone in a nonlinear mechanical-electrical-acoustical model of the cochlea.

Authors:  Julien Meaud; Karl Grosh
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Wiener kernels of chinchilla auditory-nerve fibers: verification using responses to tones, clicks, and noise and comparison with basilar-membrane vibrations.

Authors:  Andrei N Temchin; Alberto Recio-Spinoso; Pim van Dijk; Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  In vivo imaging of mammalian cochlear blood flow using fluorescence microendoscopy.

Authors:  Ashkan Monfared; Nikolas H Blevins; Eunice L M Cheung; Juergen C Jung; Gerald Popelka; Mark J Schnitzer
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Basilar membrane responses to noise at a basal site of the chinchilla cochlea: quasi-linear filtering.

Authors:  Alberto Recio-Spinoso; Shyamla S Narayan; Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-06-03

7.  Local cochlear damage reduces local nonlinearity and decreases generator-type cochlear emissions while increasing reflector-type emissions.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The effect of tectorial membrane and basilar membrane longitudinal coupling in cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  Julien Meaud; Karl Grosh
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Outer hair cell electromechanical properties in a nonlinear piezoelectric model.

Authors:  Yi-Wen Liu; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Compression, gain, and nonlinear distortion in an active cochlear model with subpartitions.

Authors:  R S Chadwick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.