Literature DB >> 34677710

The Elusive Cochlear Filter: Wave Origin of Cochlear Cross-Frequency Masking.

Alessandro Altoè1, Karolina K Charaziak2, James B Dewey2, Arturo Moleti3, Renata Sisto4, John S Oghalai2, Christopher A Shera2,5.   

Abstract

The mammalian cochlea achieves its remarkable sensitivity, frequency selectivity, and dynamic range by spatially segregating the different frequency components of sound via nonlinear processes that remain only partially understood. As a consequence of the wave-based nature of cochlear processing, the different frequency components of complex sounds interact spatially and nonlinearly, mutually suppressing one another as they propagate. Because understanding nonlinear wave interactions and their effects on hearing appears to require mathematically complex or computationally intensive models, theories of hearing that do not deal specifically with cochlear mechanics have often neglected the spatial nature of suppression phenomena. Here we describe a simple framework consisting of a nonlinear traveling-wave model whose spatial response properties can be estimated from basilar-membrane (BM) transfer functions. Without invoking jazzy details of organ-of-Corti mechanics, the model accounts well for the peculiar frequency-dependence of suppression found in two-tone suppression experiments. In particular, our analysis shows that near the peak of the traveling wave, the amplitude of the BM response depends primarily on the nonlinear properties of the traveling wave in more basal (high-frequency) regions. The proposed framework provides perhaps the simplest representation of cochlear signal processing that accounts for the spatially distributed effects of nonlinear wave propagation. Shifting the perspective from local filters to non-local, spatially distributed processes not only elucidates the character of cochlear signal processing, but also has important consequences for interpreting psychophysical experiments.
© 2021. Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cochlear mechanics; masking; suppression; traveling wave

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34677710      PMCID: PMC8599594          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-021-00814-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  90 in total

1.  Auditory sensitivity provided by self-tuned critical oscillations of hair cells.

Authors:  S Camalet; T Duke; F Jülicher; J Prost
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A computational algorithm for computing nonlinear auditory frequency selectivity.

Authors:  R Meddis; L P O'Mard; E A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Acoustic lesions in the mammalian cochlea: implications for the spatial distribution of the 'active process'.

Authors:  A R Cody
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Coherent reflection in a two-dimensional cochlea: Short-wave versus long-wave scattering in the generation of reflection-source otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Arnold Tubis; Carrick L Talmadge
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Spectral processing by the peripheral auditory system: facts and models.

Authors:  Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  Int Rev Neurobiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.230

6.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in humans.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Judy Kopun; Hongyang Tan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Nonlinear reflection as a cause of the short-latency component in stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions simulated by the methods of compression and suppression.

Authors:  Václav Vencovský; Aleš Vetešník; Anthony W Gummer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Saturation of outer hair cell receptor currents causes two-tone suppression.

Authors:  C D Geisler; G K Yates; R B Patuzzi; B M Johnstone
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Localization of the Reflection Sources of Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions.

Authors:  A Moleti; R Sisto
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-09

10.  The frequency limit of outer hair cell motility measured in vivo.

Authors:  Anna Vavakou; Nigel P Cooper; Marcel van der Heijden
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cochlear tuning and the peripheral representation of harmonic sounds in mammals.

Authors:  William P Shofner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 2.389

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.