Literature DB >> 17550179

Mutual suppression in the 6 kHz region of sensitive chinchilla cochleae.

William S Rhode1.   

Abstract

Basilar membrane (BM) vibration was measured using a displacement measuring interferometer for single-tone and two-tone suppression (2TS) paradigms in the 6-9 kHz region of sensitive chinchilla cochleae that had gains near or better than 60 dB. Based on prior studies of basilar membrane vibration, three significant differences remain between BM and auditory nerve (AN) 2TS responses: (1) suppression thresholds in the tail of tuning curves were much higher in BM than the auditory nerve (AN); (2) rates of suppression were significantly higher in AN than BM; and (3) the amplitude of vibration with low-frequency suppressors was always greater than the single-tone displacement rendering it impossible to explain 2TS rate suppression in the AN. The first two differences are eliminated by the results of the present study while the third remains. Suppression amplitudes greater than 40 dB and rates of suppression larger than 2.5 dB/dB were found for low-frequency suppressors. A correlation between both the gain and nonlinearity of the cochlea and 2TS properties indicates that when sensitive cochleae are studied. The third difference between BM and AN behavior could be strictly a function of the high-pass filter characteristic of the inner hair cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17550179     DOI: 10.1121/1.2718398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  18 in total

1.  Perception of across-frequency asynchrony and the role of cochlear delays.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Jordan A Beim; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in humans: comparison to behavioral tuning.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Pamela Souza; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-07

3.  Two-Tone Suppression of Simultaneous Electrical and Mechanical Responses in the Cochlea.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Spectral Ripples in Round-Window Cochlear Microphonics: Evidence for Multiple Generation Mechanisms.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Jonathan H Siegel; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-07-16

5.  Tuning of SFOAEs Evoked by Low-Frequency Tones Is Not Compatible with Localized Emission Generation.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-27

6.  Masking of sounds by a background noise--cochlear mechanical correlates.

Authors:  Alberto Recio-Spinoso; Nigel P Cooper
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Effect of the attachment of the tectorial membrane on cochlear micromechanics and two-tone suppression.

Authors:  Julien Meaud; Karl Grosh
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Estimating cochlear frequency selectivity with stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions in chinchillas.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-18

9.  Two-tone suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; John C Ellison; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Threshold tuning curves of chinchilla auditory-nerve fibers. I. Dependence on characteristic frequency and relation to the magnitudes of cochlear vibrations.

Authors:  Andrei N Temchin; Nola C Rich; Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.