Literature DB >> 23231114

Nonlinear time-domain cochlear model for transient stimulation and human otoacoustic emission.

Sarah Verhulst1, Torsten Dau, Christopher A Shera.   

Abstract

This paper describes the implementation and performance of a nonlinear time-domain model of the cochlea for transient stimulation and human otoacoustic emission generation. The nonlinearity simulates compressive growth of measured basilar-membrane impulse responses. The model accounts for reflection and distortion-source otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) and simulates spontaneous OAEs through manipulation of the middle-ear reflectance. The model was calibrated using human psychoacoustical and otoacoustic tuning parameters. It can be used to investigate time-dependent properties of cochlear mechanics and the generator mechanisms of otoacoustic emissions. Furthermore, the model provides a suitable preprocessor for human auditory perception models where realistic cochlear excitation patterns are desired.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23231114      PMCID: PMC3528681          DOI: 10.1121/1.4763989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  28 in total

1.  Estimates of human cochlear tuning at low levels using forward and simultaneous masking.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-07-10

2.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  A symmetry suppresses the cochlear catastrophe.

Authors:  C A Shera; G Zweig
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Finding the impedance of the organ of Corti.

Authors:  G Zweig
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  G Zweig; C A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  COAEs and SSOAEs in adults with increased age.

Authors:  B A Prieve; S R Falter
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Numerical methods for solving one-dimensional cochlear models in the time domain.

Authors:  R J Diependaal; H Duifhuis; H W Hoogstraten; M A Viergever
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Spontaneous, click-, and toneburst-evoked otoacoustic emissions from normal ears.

Authors:  R Probst; A C Coats; G K Martin; B L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Suggested formulae for calculating auditory-filter bandwidths and excitation patterns.

Authors:  B C Moore; B R Glasberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Properties of the generator of stimulated acoustic emissions.

Authors:  D T Kemp; R Chum
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  20 in total

1.  Functional modeling of the human auditory brainstem response to broadband stimulation.

Authors:  Sarah Verhulst; Hari M Bharadwaj; Golbarg Mehraei; Christopher A Shera; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory brainstem response latency in forward masking, a marker of sensory deficits in listeners with normal hearing thresholds.

Authors:  Golbarg Mehraei; Andreu Paredes Gallardo; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Torsten Dau
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  The spiral staircase: tonotopic microstructure and cochlear tuning.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  An analytic physically motivated model of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  Samiya A Alkhairy; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  On the possibility of a place code for the low pitch of high-frequency complex tones.

Authors:  Sébastien Santurette; Torsten Dau; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The effect of stimulus bandwidth on the nonlinear-derived tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emission.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Shawn S Goodman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-23

7.  Relation Between Cochlear Mechanics and Performance of Temporal Fine Structure-Based Tasks.

Authors:  Sho Otsuka; Shigeto Furukawa; Shimpei Yamagishi; Koich Hirota; Makio Kashino
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-09-08

8.  Dynamics of cochlear nonlinearity: Automatic gain control or instantaneous damping?

Authors:  Alessandro Altoè; Karolina K Charaziak; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Relating the Variability of Tone-Burst Otoacoustic Emission and Auditory Brainstem Response Latencies to the Underlying Cochlear Mechanics.

Authors:  Sarah Verhulst; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  AIP Conf Proc       Date:  2015-12-31

10.  Psychophysical and modeling approaches towards determining the cochlear phase response based on interaural time differences.

Authors:  Hisaaki Tabuchi; Bernhard Laback
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.