Literature DB >> 15807011

Cochlear gain control.

Marcel van der Heijden1.   

Abstract

The nonlinear auditory phenomena of compression, suppression, and distortion are known to have a cochlear-mechanical origin. An instantaneous nonlinear transfer function is often assumed to underlie these phenomena, but there are experimental indications that auditory nonlinearity is sluggish rather than instantaneous. This study analyzes the consequences of such sluggishness, using automatic gain control (AGC) as a model noninstantaneous nonlinearity. The distinctive characteristic of AGC, its delayed action, is shown to produce a number of observable and measurable effects that distinguish AGC from instantaneous nonlinearities. A major class of such AGC-specific effects concerns the phase of aural distortion products. For example, the phase of the cancellation tone in the classical psychoacoustic cancellation paradigm is linearly related to the frequency spacing of the primary tones in an AGC, as opposed to the square-law relationship produced by an instantaneous nonlinearity. These and other predictions are confronted with experimental data from the literature. The impact of putative AGC-related delays on the interpretation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) is discussed. Detailed suggestions are made for experiments specifically aimed at determining whether cochlear nonlinearity is instantaneous or delayed.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15807011     DOI: 10.1121/1.1856375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  7 in total

1.  Effects of low-frequency biasing on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: amplitude modulation.

Authors:  Lin Bian; Kelly L Watts
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Basilar membrane responses to noise at a basal site of the chinchilla cochlea: quasi-linear filtering.

Authors:  Alberto Recio-Spinoso; Shyamla S Narayan; Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-06-03

3.  Manipulation of the Endocochlear Potential Reveals Two Distinct Types of Cochlear Nonlinearity.

Authors:  C Elliott Strimbu; Yi Wang; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Dynamics of cochlear nonlinearity: Automatic gain control or instantaneous damping?

Authors:  Alessandro Altoè; Karolina K Charaziak; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Low-frequency modulation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Authors:  Lin Bian; Nicole M Scherrer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Asymmetry and Microstructure of Temporal-Suppression Patterns in Basilar-Membrane Responses to Clicks: Relation to Tonal Suppression and Traveling-Wave Dispersion.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Wei Dong; Alessandro Altoè; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-03-12

7.  Energy Flux in the Cochlea: Evidence Against Power Amplification of the Traveling Wave.

Authors:  Marcel van der Heijden; Corstiaen P C Versteegh
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-07-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.