Literature DB >> 10913888

Nonlinear temporal interactions in click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. II. Experimental data.

S Kapadia1, M E Lutman.   

Abstract

Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs) are reduced in amplitude by the presentation of 'suppressor' clicks that either closely lead or follow the stimulus ('test') clicks. A model described in a companion paper (Kapadia and Lutman, Hear. Res. 146 (2000) 89-100) shows that such nonlinear temporal interactions, as previously reported, may be explained in terms of the compressive non-linearity of the CEOAE input-output (I-O) function. This paper presents the results of a detailed parametric investigation into such nonlinear interactions, studied in 12 normal adult ears over a wide range of test and suppressor click levels and inter-click intervals. The results differ from those generated by the model in a number of respects. Principally, maximum suppression is generally obtained for suppressors presented in advance of test clicks, rather than co-incident with the test clicks. The amount of advance depends systematically on the two click levels. The measured suppression can also exceed the theoretical maximum allowed by the model. It is concluded that the nonlinear temporal interactions measured do not simply reflect CEOAE I-O function non-linearity. They may, instead, arise from disturbance of the generator elements from their resting state prior to generation of the CEOAE. These results may also have general implications relating to cochlear responses to transient stimuli and indicate the potential of CEOAEs in probing aspects of cochlear mechanics.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10913888     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(00)00103-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  6 in total

1.  High frequency transient-evoked otoacoustic emission measurements using chirp and click stimuli.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Chelsea M Blankenship; Angela C Garinis; Daniel B Putterman; Marcin Wróblewski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Comparisons of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions using chirp and click stimuli.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Can a Static Nonlinearity Account for the Dynamics of Otoacoustic Emission Suppression?

Authors:  Sarah Verhulst; Christopher A Shera; James M Harte; Torsten Dau
Journal:  AIP Conf Proc       Date:  2011-11

4.  Basilar membrane and tectorial membrane stiffness in the CBA/CaJ mouse.

Authors:  I U Teudt; C P Richter
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-05-28

5.  Temporal Suppression of Clicked-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions and Basilar-Membrane Motion in Gerbils.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Wei Dong; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  AIP Conf Proc       Date:  2018-05-31

6.  Asymmetry and Microstructure of Temporal-Suppression Patterns in Basilar-Membrane Responses to Clicks: Relation to Tonal Suppression and Traveling-Wave Dispersion.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Wei Dong; Alessandro Altoè; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-03-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.