Literature DB >> 33656936

Envelope following responses predict speech-in-noise performance in normal-hearing listeners.

Anita M Mepani1, Sarah Verhulst2, Kenneth E Hancock1,3, Markus Garrett2,4, Viacheslav Vasilkov2, Kara Bennett5, Victor de Gruttola5, M Charles Liberman1,3,6, Stéphane F Maison1,3,6.   

Abstract

Permanent threshold elevation after noise exposure or aging is caused by loss of sensory cells; however, animal studies show that hair cell loss is often preceded by degeneration of the synapses between sensory cells and auditory nerve fibers. Silencing these neurons is likely to degrade auditory processing and may contribute to difficulties understanding speech in noisy backgrounds. Reduction of suprathreshold ABR amplitudes can be used to quantify synaptopathy in inbred mice. However, ABR amplitudes are highly variable in humans, and thus more challenging to use. Since noise-induced neuropathy preferentially targets fibers with high thresholds and low spontaneous rate and because phase locking to temporal envelopes is particularly strong in these fibers, measuring envelope following responses (EFRs) might be a more robust measure of cochlear synaptopathy. A recent auditory model further suggests that modulation of carrier tones with rectangular envelopes should be less sensitive to cochlear amplifier dysfunction and, therefore, a better metric of cochlear neural damage than sinusoidal amplitude modulation. In this study, we measure performance scores on a variety of difficult word-recognition tasks among listeners with normal audiograms and assess correlations with EFR magnitudes to rectangular versus sinusoidal modulation. Higher harmonics of EFR magnitudes evoked by a rectangular-envelope stimulus were significantly correlated with word scores, whereas those evoked by sinusoidally modulated tones did not. These results support previous reports that individual differences in synaptopathy may be a source of speech recognition variability despite the presence of normal thresholds at standard audiometric frequencies.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Recent studies suggest that millions of people may be at risk of permanent impairment from cochlear synaptopathy, the age-related and noise-induced degeneration of neural connections in the inner ear. This study examines electrophysiological responses to stimuli designed to improve detection of neural damage in subjects with normal hearing sensitivity. The resultant correlations with word recognition performance are consistent with a contribution of cochlear neural damage to deficits in hearing in noise abilities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory nerve; cochlea; cochlear synaptopathy; envelope following responses; hearing in noise

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33656936      PMCID: PMC8282226          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00620.2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  49 in total

1.  The influence of carrier level and frequency on modulation and beat-detection thresholds for sinusoidal carriers

Authors: 
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Age-related loss of activity of auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  R A Schmiedt; J H Mills; F A Boettcher
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Reliability of Measures Intended to Assess Threshold-Independent Hearing Disorders.

Authors:  Aryn M Kamerer; Judy G Kopun; Sara E Fultz; Stephen T Neely; Daniel M Rasetshwane
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Department of Veterans Affairs compact disc recording for auditory perceptual assessment: background and introduction.

Authors:  D Noffsinger; R H Wilson; F E Musiek
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Quantitative evaluation of myelinated nerve fibres and hair cells in cochleae of humans with age-related high-tone hearing loss.

Authors:  E Felder; A Schrott-Fischer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise.

Authors:  J R Dubno; D D Dirks; D E Morgan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Chronic Conductive Hearing Loss Is Associated With Speech Intelligibility Deficits in Patients With Normal Bone Conduction Thresholds.

Authors:  Masahiro Okada; D Bradley Welling; M Charles Liberman; Stéphane F Maison
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Middle Ear Muscle Reflex and Word Recognition in "Normal-Hearing" Adults: Evidence for Cochlear Synaptopathy?

Authors:  Anita M Mepani; Sarah A Kirk; Kenneth E Hancock; Kara Bennett; Victor de Gruttola; M Charles Liberman; Stéphane F Maison
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Speech Intelligibility Deficits Following Threshold Recovery.

Authors:  Masahiro Okada; Aravindakshan Parthasarathy; D Bradley Welling; M Charles Liberman; Stéphane F Maison
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 July/Aug       Impact factor: 3.562

10.  Effects of Kainic Acid-Induced Auditory Nerve Damage on Envelope-Following Responses in the Budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Authors:  John L Wilson; Kristina S Abrams; Kenneth S Henry
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-10-19
View more
  11 in total

1.  Noise Masking in Cochlear Synaptopathy: Auditory Brainstem Response vs. Auditory Nerve Response in Mouse.

Authors:  Kirupa Suthakar; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 2.974

2.  Using Auditory Characteristics to Select Hearing Aid Compression Speeds for Presbycusic Patients.

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Jing Chen; Yanmei Zhang; Baoxuan Sun; Yuhe Liu
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 5.702

3.  Predicting neural deficits in sensorineural hearing loss from word recognition scores.

Authors:  Kelsie J Grant; Aravindakshan Parthasarathy; Viacheslav Vasilkov; Benjamin Caswell-Midwinter; Maria E Freitas; Victor de Gruttola; Daniel B Polley; M Charles Liberman; Stéphane F Maison
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Cutting Through the Noise: Noise-Induced Cochlear Synaptopathy and Individual Differences in Speech Understanding Among Listeners With Normal Audiograms.

Authors:  Mishaela DiNino; Lori L Holt; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.562

5.  The summating potential in human electrocochleography: Gaussian models and Fourier analysis.

Authors:  Kenneth E Hancock; Bennett O'Brien; Rosamaria Santarelli; M Charles Liberman; Stéphane F Maison
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.482

Review 6.  Animal-to-Human Translation Difficulties and Problems With Proposed Coding-in-Noise Deficits in Noise-Induced Synaptopathy and Hidden Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Sara Ripley; Li Xia; Zhen Zhang; Steve J Aiken; Jian Wang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 5.152

7.  Estimated cochlear neural degeneration is associated with loudness hypersensitivity in individuals with normal audiograms.

Authors:  Kelly N Jahn; Kenneth E Hancock; Stéphane F Maison; Daniel B Polley
Journal:  JASA Express Lett       Date:  2022-06-13

8.  The search for correlates of age-related cochlear synaptopathy: Measures of temporal envelope processing and spatial release from speech-on-speech masking.

Authors:  Chhayakanta Patro; Heather A Kreft; Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 3.672

Review 9.  Current topics in hearing research: Deafferentation and threshold independent hearing loss.

Authors:  Monica Trevino; Edward Lobarinas
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 3.672

Review 10.  Prevention of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Using Investigational Medicines for the Inner Ear: Previous Trial Outcomes Should Inform Future Trial Design.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 7.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.