Literature DB >> 31895275

Do Polymer Coatings Change the Aberrations of Conventional and Wavefront-guided Scleral Lenses?

Gareth D Hastings, Julianna Z Zanayed, Lan Chi Nguyen1, Raymond A Applegate1, Jason D Marsack1.   

Abstract

SIGNIFICANCE: The findings of this study indicate that patients could simultaneously be offered the individualized optical correction of wavefront-guided (WFG) lenses and the superior comfort afforded by polymer coatings. This could be helpful to patients with ectasia suffering ocular dryness or dependent on scleral lenses for lengthy periods of wear.
PURPOSE: Wavefront-guided scleral lenses target lower- and higher-order aberrations of individual eyes using submicrometer-level contours in the anterior lens surface. Hydrophilic polyethylene glycol (PEG) polymer coatings applied to lens surfaces improve comfort and wettability. This study aimed to quantify aberration changes (e.g., masking) when applying polymer coatings to WFG and conventional scleral lenses.
METHODS: Two control lenses (remained uncoated) and 14 experimental lenses (two repeated builds of seven aberration designs: one spherical, two coma, four full WFG [second- to fifth-order aberrations]) were manufactured, and aberrations were measured (mean of three) by two operators before and after coating. Root mean square (RMS) and visual image quality (logVSX) differences were calculated for 6-mm diameters.
RESULTS: Median RMS aberration change due to coating was 0.012 μm (range, 0.008 to 0.057 μm). Maximum logVSX change due to coating was 0.073, predicting an approximately one letter change in acuity. Instrument sensitivity was 0.002 μm. Acute instrument and operator variabilities (standard deviations of individual [second- to fifth-order Zernikes] were all <0.027 μm). Longitudinal variability (control lenses) was low: all less than 0.017 μm. Although RMS of differences between repeated builds of all lenses was less than 0.25 D and not statistically significant, relatively, manufacture constituted the major variability, and RMS difference between repeated builds was at least four times greater than the effect of coating (median, 0.167 μm; range, 0.088 to 0.312 μm).
CONCLUSIONS: Application of polymer coatings caused measurable changes in aberrations of WFG and conventional scleral lenses; however, these were clinically and statistically insignificant and within variability of repeated lens manufacture. In their current states, WFG lenses and polymer coatings could be used simultaneously.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31895275      PMCID: PMC7004490          DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   2.106


  31 in total

1.  Method for optimizing the correction of the eye's higher-order aberrations in the presence of decentrations.

Authors:  Antonio Guirao; Ian G Cox; David R Williams
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Visual acuity as a function of Zernike mode and level of root mean square error.

Authors:  Raymond A Applegate; Charles Ballentine; Hillery Gross; Edwin J Sarver; Charlene A Sarver
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 3.  Design principles and limitations of wave-front guided contact lenses.

Authors:  Larry N Thibos; Xu Cheng; Arthur Bradley
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.018

4.  Predicting subjective judgment of best focus with objective image quality metrics.

Authors:  Xu Cheng; Arthur Bradley; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-04-23       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Measurement of wave-front aberration in soft contact lenses by use of a Shack-Hartmann wave-front sensor.

Authors:  Tae Moon Jeong; Manoj Menon; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 1.980

6.  Impact of Zernike-fit error on simulated high- and low-contrast acuity in keratoconus: implications for using Zernike-based corrections.

Authors:  Jason D Marsack; Konrad Pesudovs; Edwin J Sarver; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Limitations of the ocular wavefront correction with contact lenses.

Authors:  Norberto López-Gil; José Francisco Castejón-Mochón; Vicente Fernández-Sánchez
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Registration tolerance of a custom correction to maintain visual acuity.

Authors:  Yue Shi; Raymond A Applegate; Xin Wei; Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Harold E Bedell
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Performance of wavefront-guided soft lenses in three keratoconus subjects.

Authors:  Jason D Marsack; Katrina E Parker; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Are all aberrations equal?

Authors:  Raymond A Applegate; Edwin J Sarver; Vic Khemsara
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  3 in total

1.  Influence of rigid lens decentration and rotation on visual image quality in normal and keratoconic eyes.

Authors:  Jos J Rozema; Gareth D Hastings; Marta Jiménez-García; Carina Koppen; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 3.992

2.  Orientation-specific long-term neural adaptation of the visual system in keratoconus.

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Alexander W Schill; Chuan Hu; Daniel R Coates; Raymond A Applegate; Jason D Marsack
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 1.984

3.  Quantifying the Optical and Physical Consequences of Daily Cleaning on Conventional and Wavefront-guided Scleral Lenses.

Authors:  Sarah M Wilting; Gareth D Hastings; Lan Chi Nguyen; Matthew J Kauffman; Elizabeth S Bell; Chuan Hu; Sujata Rijal; Jason D Marsack
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.106

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.