Literature DB >> 16604756

Impact of Zernike-fit error on simulated high- and low-contrast acuity in keratoconus: implications for using Zernike-based corrections.

Jason D Marsack1, Konrad Pesudovs, Edwin J Sarver, Raymond A Applegate.   

Abstract

This study examines the extent to which a Zernike-based optical correction can restore acuity in keratoconus as a function of disease severity and contrast level. Increasingly complete Zernike corrections in the presence of Zernike-fit error were simulated. Acuity for keratoconic eyes with <60 D maximum corneal power reached 20/13 with a fifth-order Zernike correction under high-contrast conditions and exhibited a loss of 0.1 logMAR (minimum angle of resolution) (from 20/32 to 20/40) for low-contrast conditions. Acuity for keratoconic eyes with >60 D maximum corneal power approached 20/13 with sixth-tenth-order corrections under high-contrast conditions but did not return to similar levels with a tenth-order correction for low-contrast conditions. The results suggest that fit error affects visual performance for more difficult tasks and that restoring high-contrast acuity (20/16 or better) using a fifth-order Zernike correction is not limited by Zernike=fit error for over 88% of keratoconus cases.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16604756      PMCID: PMC1764493          DOI: 10.1364/josaa.23.000769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  27 in total

1.  Method for optimizing the correction of the eye's higher-order aberrations in the presence of decentrations.

Authors:  Antonio Guirao; Ian G Cox; David R Williams
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Visual acuity as a function of Zernike mode and level of root mean square error.

Authors:  Raymond A Applegate; Charles Ballentine; Hillery Gross; Edwin J Sarver; Charlene A Sarver
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Applying wavefront sensors and corneal topography to keratoconus.

Authors:  Jason Marsack; Thomas Milner; Grady Rylander; Norman Leach; Austin Roorda
Journal:  Biomed Sci Instrum       Date:  2002

Review 4.  Design principles and limitations of wave-front guided contact lenses.

Authors:  Larry N Thibos; Xu Cheng; Arthur Bradley
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.018

5.  A method to predict refractive errors from wave aberration data.

Authors:  Antonio Guirao; David R Williams
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Interaction between aberrations to improve or reduce visual performance.

Authors:  Raymond A Applegate; Jason D Marsack; Roberto Ramos; Edwin J Sarver
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  Wavefront aberrations measured with Hartmann-Shack sensor in patients with keratoconus.

Authors:  Naoyuki Maeda; Takashi Fujikado; Teruhito Kuroda; Toshifumi Mihashi; Yoko Hirohara; Kohji Nishida; Hitoshi Watanabe; Yasuo Tano
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Calculated impact of higher-order monochromatic aberrations on retinal image quality in a population of human eyes.

Authors:  Antonio Guirao; Jason Porter; David R Williams; Ian G Cox
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Validation of the estimation of corneal aberrations from videokeratography in keratoconus.

Authors:  Sergio Barbero; Susana Marcos; Jesus Merayo-Lloves; Esther Moreno-Barriuso
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Are all aberrations equal?

Authors:  Raymond A Applegate; Edwin J Sarver; Vic Khemsara
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  6 in total

1.  Effect of sampling on real ocular aberration measurements.

Authors:  Lourdes Llorente; Susana Marcos; Carlos Dorronsoro; Stephen A Burns
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Comparison of Wavefront-guided and Best Conventional Scleral Lenses after Habituation in Eyes with Corneal Ectasia.

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Raymond A Applegate; Lan Chi Nguyen; Matthew J Kauffman; Roxana T Hemmati; Jason D Marsack
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Performance of wavefront-guided soft lenses in three keratoconus subjects.

Authors:  Jason D Marsack; Katrina E Parker; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Wavefront-guided scleral lens correction in keratoconus.

Authors:  Jason D Marsack; Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Chi Nguyen; Anita Ticak; Darren E Koenig; James D Elswick; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Production and activity of matrix metalloproteinase-9 on the ocular surface increase in dysfunctional tear syndrome.

Authors:  Suksri Chotikavanich; Cintia S de Paiva; De Quan Li; Joseph J Chen; Fang Bian; William J Farley; Stephen C Pflugfelder
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-02-28       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Do Polymer Coatings Change the Aberrations of Conventional and Wavefront-guided Scleral Lenses?

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Julianna Z Zanayed; Lan Chi Nguyen; Raymond A Applegate; Jason D Marsack
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.106

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.